1
   

How Many More Mike Browns Are Out There?

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 08:12 am
Quote:
From the Magazine | Nation


How Many More Mike Browns Are Out There?

A TIME inquiry finds that at top positions in some vital government agencies, the Bush Administration is putting connections before experience
By MARK THOMPSON, KAREN TUMULTY, MIKE ALLEN / WASHINGTON
SUBSCRIBE TO TIMEPRINTE-MAILMORE BY AUTHOR

TIME: How Reliable Is Brown's Resume?
Posted Sunday, Sep. 25, 2005
Vignette StoryServer 5.0 Mon Sep 26 11:34:32 2005 In presidential politics, the victor always gets the spoils, and chief among them is the vast warren of offices that make up the federal bureaucracy. Historically, the U.S. public has never paid much attention to the people the President chooses to sit behind those thousands of desks. A benign cronyism is more or less presumed, with old friends and big donors getting comfortable positions and impressive titles, and with few real consequences for the nation.

But then came Michael Brown. When President Bush's former point man on disasters was discovered to have more expertise about the rules of Arabian horse competition than about the management of a catastrophe, it was a reminder that the competence of government officials who are not household names can have a life or death impact. The Brown debacle has raised pointed questions about whether political connections, not qualifications, have helped an unusually high number of Bush appointees land vitally important jobs in the Federal Government.

The Bush Administration didn't invent cronyism; John F. Kennedy turned the Justice Department over to his brother, while Bill Clinton gave his most ambitious domestic policy initiative to his wife. Jimmy Carter made his old friend Bert Lance his budget director, only to see him hauled in front of the Senate to answer questions on his past banking practices in Georgia, and George H.W. Bush deposited so many friends at the Commerce Department that the agency was known internally as "Bush Gardens." The difference is that this Bush Administration had a plan from day one for remaking the bureaucracy, and has done so with greater success.

As far back as the Florida recount, soon-to-be Vice President Dick Cheney was poring over organizational charts of the government with an eye toward stocking it with people sympathetic to the incoming Administration. Clay Johnson III, Bush's former Yale roommate and the Administration's chief architect of personnel, recalls preparing for the inner circle's first trip from Austin, Texas, to Washington: "We were standing there getting ready to get on a plane, looking at each other like: Can you believe what we're getting ready to do?"

The Office of Personnel Management's Plum Book, published at the start of each presidential Administration, shows that there are more than 3,000 positions a President can fill without consideration for civil service rules. And Bush has gone further than most Presidents to put political stalwarts in some of the most important government jobs you've never heard of, and to give them genuine power over the bureaucracy. "These folks are really good at using the instruments of government to promote the President's political agenda," says Paul Light, a professor of public service at New York University and a well-known expert on the machinery of government. "And I think that takes you well into the gray zone where few Presidents have dared to go in the past. It's the coordination and centralization that's important here."



http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1109345,00.html


It's who you know not what you know that matters in the Bush administration.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,216 • Replies: 21
No top replies

 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 09:46 am
Yep, this is what I've been thinking, too.
0 Replies
 
Steppenwolf
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 10:09 am
Well, isn't Bush II a Mike Brown? Why should he favor competence over connections given his life path?
0 Replies
 
Chrissee
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 08:32 pm
Anyone listen to the hearing. He perjured himself. He said the it was Blanco who did not request help for the Southeatern parishes.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 08:42 pm
He sat there today and talked so much ****, I had to leave the room. What a scam artist HE is.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 08:47 pm
He said Blanco didn't request for the southern parishes???

Remember the thread I started about how Blanco requested for the South and Bush / FEMA declared the north?

The documents are VERY clear on that.
0 Replies
 
Chrissee
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 09:42 pm
he even said he was surprised that she didnt request the souther parishes
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 09:45 pm
I've been remembering this incident since Brownie's 'resignation":

The managing director for a theatre I once worked for hired a woman as the pr/advertising director based on lies and deceit. Foolishly, he did not phone her references, did not do a background check at all and agreed to pay her a six-figure salary with a guarantee, on paper, of a full year salary after three months. After she had threatened many in the department and assured us that some would be fired, one angry employee went to personnel and lo and behold, it was discovered that this womans' resume was full of lies and that she was a total and complete scam artist who had pulled this same routine on other theatres in years passed. But guess what? Altho she was fired and escorted out by security, because the managing director had signed a contract guaranteeing her salary, the theatre was forced to pay her over 100,000.00.
Sounds like they were sleeping together, huh? We never did get to the bottom of that but the board was livid and the following year, the managing director finally resigned.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 09:49 pm
When Bush appoints a horse shoe manager to direct FEMA, what do you expect? Horse ****.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 09:50 pm
Don't forget; Bush praised Brown for doing a good job as director of FEMA. He might award him a presidential citation like some others he presented to people who left their jobs - voluntarily.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 09:55 pm
Couldn't you just puke?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 07:15 am
Talk about hiring people in one's own image. I guess no one wants people working for them smarter than they are. With Bush that requires fishing at the bottom of the barrel.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 08:08 am
Cronies at the till


The New York Times

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2005





Quote:
The first results are in on who is set to profit from the Katrina cleanup, and - surprise - many of the firms winning major contracts have big political connections. Congressional investigators are already looking into AshBritt, a company with ties to Mississippi's governor, Haley Barbour - the former chairman of the Republican National Committee. AshBritt has nabbed $568 million in contracts for trash removal. Questions have also been raised about the political connections of two other major contractors: the Shaw Group, and Kellogg, Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton.
The New York Times reported on Monday that more than 80 percent of the $1.5 billion in contracts signed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for Katrina work were awarded without bidding or with limited competition. The government is spending more than a quarter of a billion dollars every day on rescue, relief and reconstruction along the Gulf Coast. Anyone who pays taxes in America should be concerned about how the money is being spent and who is profiting. When Congress appropriates money for disaster relief, the advantage should be maximized for the victims, not for the same cast of characters who have been profiting from no-bid contracts in Iraq. Kellogg, Brown & Root, Americans may recall, is the company that came up with those $100-per-bag laundry bills for work in Iraq.

Last week, the Homeland Security Department appointed the National Weather Service's chief financial officer, Matthew Jadacki, to head a new Office for Hurricane Katrina Oversight. That's a step in the right direction. The office itself is a good idea, and Jadacki's experience is a welcome contrast with that of many of the inexperienced political appointees who have been exposed by this crisis.
But the administration will have to go a lot further if it wants any chance of regaining the trust of the American people that it has so squandered. The true test of the new oversight office will be in its financing and staffing. America doesn't need a public relations stunt; it needs a functioning means of curbing abuse.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Oct, 2005 05:51 pm
au, That's the republican way; it only matters that they have a political connection. Skill, ability, and background is not important, but make sure they are paid more than ten times what it really costs.


Shet on the poor and the middle class that doesn't have a clue what's going on. Bankrupt our government, so that the opposition party can't spend money that's not there, and they'll cry bloody murder when they do.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Oct, 2005 06:24 pm
I say we all go down to the White house kick the doors down and yell " Alright, What the hells going on in here! Hey You, sit down pal party's over. " Think that'll work?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Oct, 2005 06:26 pm
If you don't value your life, it might work, but the chances are almost nil.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Oct, 2005 06:30 pm
Yehhh, I guess your right. Back to the drawing board. I got it, vote! No that don't work either. Stop paying our taxes!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Oct, 2005 06:36 pm
It was really funny when Ms Sheehan was being dragged off by those officers in Washington DC after Katrina.

The republicans thought Katrina would overtake the news media, then here comes Ms Sheehan being plastered all over the media getting back the attention the republican's dread. Then, thousands across the US and in London have demonstrations against the war in Iraq, and only about 400 come out to show support for this war.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Oct, 2005 06:49 pm
She's the kick in the ass the movement needed. Galloway's getting alot of attention too. In 1969 there were 750,000 people in front of the White house.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Oct, 2005 07:06 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
The republicans thought Katrina would overtake the news media, then here comes Ms Sheehan being plastered all over the media getting back the attention the republican's dread.
And "dread" is the word. The Republicans have pulled all the stops out of their smear machine, and they still can't lay a glove on her popularity. Twisted Evil

cicerone imposter wrote:
Then, thousands across the US and in London have demonstrations against the war in Iraq...
100,000 in Washington alone.

cicerone imposter wrote:
....and only about 400 come out to show support for this war.
All the more remarkable because Cindy's little group on Monday was practicing civil disobediance-they fully expected to get arrested, and they did. There were over 350 of them.

While the pro-war demonstration was not civil disobediance. Nobody was expected to get arrested, and they didn't.

Cindy can draw just about as many people to commit to get arrested as the present pro-war people can draw with no danger of getting arrested at all. That's amazing.

This woman is driving Bush and the pro-war crowd nuts-and there isn't a damn thing they can do about it. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » How Many More Mike Browns Are Out There?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 07:23:27