The 47th President and the Post-Biden World 2.0

He was staying at the hotel so that enabled him to evade some of the security but he never got that close to the dinner. There were multiple layers of security – if he had gotten past the security in the hallway he still would have had a hard time getting into the ballroom. It doesn't look suspicious to me, it's just another indictment of the USA and its stupid gun laws.

According to reports, he sounds like a really intelligent guy, highly thought of by students he tutored and his pastor!

Then explain why you don't think these opinions are justifiable. Give an example, as I did with Leavitt's statement.

He doesn't have to. He'd only be referring to the "evidence" in the video – which you could easily address yourself.

With the war aims unclear, the Strait of Hormuz blocked and negotiations stalling, Trump has miscalculated in his war against Iran – with consequences for the global economy.

‘The Americans have quite clearly gone into this war in Iran without any strategy whatsoever.’ That is why it is all the more difficult to bring the conflict to an end now. Especially as the Iranians are evidently negotiating very skilfully – or, indeed, very skilfully not negotiating.

An entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership.

Be it the intervention in Venezuela, the threats against Greenland, the war against Iran, the blockade of Cuba, or the dispute with the EU and NATO: the list of wars and conflicts triggered by US President Donald Trump this year is long, and 2026 isn’t even halfway through.

Another crisis could be on the horizon. It concerns the Falkland Islands, over which Argentina and the UK went to war in 1982.

The reason for this is an internal memo from Washington.
The letter did not specify any concrete measures, nor have any been taken to date. The underlying message, however, is that it is not a foregone conclusion that the Falkland Islands must belong to the United Kingdom.

If the US were to withdraw its support for Britain’s claims to the Falklands, this would demonstrate the extent to which the country is turning away from its traditional foreign policy – towards a policy that is more or less (more more than less) directly subservient to Trump’s interests.

Falklands is a pressure point for the UK – and the US knows it
According to Ed Arnold of the British think tank Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) in the above quoted BBC report "we could well see a situation in which Argentina pushes for intervention at the United Nations and the US either supports this or, at the very least, does not actively block it."
So, rather than involving soldiers, the dispute over the Falklands could be resolved through a series of negotiations. (But hopefully without those notorious American “negotiators”!)

What I find quite incredible is that there's still people in America who don't want to kill Trump.

Many of the people I've spoken to would prefer to see him incapacitated with some debilitating affliction, drooling, and babbling like a baby. That way he wouldn't be seen as a martyr or tragic victim of a hate crime.