Can a good socialist government exist independently of government language?

Are progressive words, terms, and phrases associated with liberal ideology used in movements and campaigns against socialist government? I think political speech can't really be separated from political activity as a whole.

The general truth, of the query's intention is the premise that socialism and liberalism are a synchronicity, and that the government language angle is a truth of value sets that oppose liberalism and socialism together.

The terms squatter, deserter, traitor, striker especially, and unemployed are unanimously conservative value sets, as in they are implementations rooted in the conservative cause of property choice and worker class reality.

The query, is if a functional state - not nation-state - of social cohesion and social function and social cooperation can be free without the nation-state versions of language oppressions, i.e. squatter, strike, desertion, unemployment, traitor etc, as paradoxical a specific query that is.