1
   

U.S. DECLINES offer of 1,500 cuban doctors

 
 
CoastalRat
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2005 11:10 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Even if they were busses, who was going to drive them?

You do realize that it requires a license to do so.

If the mayor loads a bunch of people onto busses, and the drivers he puts in charge don't have licenses, who is responsible when one flips over on the highway and burns everyone to death?


So maybe the government of NO and LA should have forseen that in an evacuation situation they would need to use buses and such for those who had no transportation out and should have had capable drivers designated to drive the evacuees out. Seems like this would have been a reasonable thing to think about.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2005 11:13 am
Well, according tp the American Red Cross, their presence would have kept people from evacuating and encourage others to come into the city.

Besides:
Quote:
"We are an organization of civilian volunteers and cannot get relief aid into any location until the local authorities say it is safe and provide us with security and access.

The original plan was to evacuate all the residents of New Orleans to safe places outside the city. With the hurricane bearing down, the city government decided to open a shelter of last resort in the Superdome downtown. We applaud this decision and believe it saved a significant number of lives. "
Source


In exchange, why weren't planes from Germany, the UK and Russia allowed to land in the USA? (The German food, 25 tons, HAD been distributed in NO before .... and as well to US soldiers in Afghanistan AND was asked by the US ambassador.)
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2005 11:19 am
Who are you apologizing for, Walter? The full text of your link follows:

Quote:
# Acess to New Orleans is controlled by the National Guard and local authorities and while we are in constant contact with them, we simply cannot enter New Orleans against their orders.

# The state Homeland Security Department had requested--and continues to request--that the American Red Cross not come back into New Orleans following the hurricane. Our presence would keep people from evacuating and encourage others to come into the city.

# The Red Cross has been meeting the needs of thousands of New Orleans residents in some 90 shelters throughout the state of Louisiana and elsewhere since before landfall. All told, the Red Cross is today operating 149 shelters for almost 93,000 residents.

# The Red Cross shares the nation's anguish over the worsening situation inside the city. We will continue to work under the direction of the military, state and local authorities and to focus all our efforts on our lifesaving mission of feeding and sheltering.

# The Red Cross does not conduct search and rescue operations. We are an organization of civilian volunteers and cannot get relief aid into any location until the local authorities say it is safe and provide us with security and access.

# The original plan was to evacuate all the residents of New Orleans to safe places outside the city. With the hurricane bearing down, the city government decided to open a shelter of last resort in the Superdome downtown. We applaud this decision and believe it saved a significant number of lives.

# As the remaining people are evacuated from New Orleans, the most appropriate role for the Red Cross is to provide a safe place for people to stay and to see that their emergency needs are met. We are fully staffed and equipped to handle these individuals once they are evacuated.


As far as food from other countries, I don't know why the planes weren't allowed to land in the USA, but I think we had plenty of food here that wasn't getting distributed, so as far as priority of problems go, I think that one belongs further down the list.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2005 11:27 am
Ticomaya wrote:
As far as food from other countries, I don't know why the planes weren't allowed to land in the USA, but I think we had plenty of food here that wasn't getting distributed, so as far as priority of problems go, I think that one belongs further down the list.


Thanks, although - as said - this answer is different to the request from Bew Orleans and the US-ambassador: both asked last week for more.

I wasn't apologising anyone, just quoting from the website.

Thanks for pasting/copying the complete text.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2005 11:41 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Thanks, although - as said - this answer is different to the request from Bew Orleans and the US-ambassador: both asked last week for more.


I didn't mean to imply at all that the donations of food were not welcome. I think the generosity of other nations to our crisis is wonderful. All I meant to say was that in looking at the immediate reaction after the hurricane, the problem was in getting needed food, water, and law enforcement to the people that needed it. The food we had, plenty of it, wasn't able to be given to those in dire straights, apparently due to the actions of local government.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Sep, 2005 12:54 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
I didn't mean to imply at all that the donations of food were not welcome. I think the generosity of other nations to our crisis is wonderful. All I meant to say was that in looking at the immediate reaction after the hurricane, the problem was in getting needed food, water, and law enforcement to the people that needed it. The food we had, plenty of it, wasn't able to be given to those in dire straights, apparently due to the actions of local government.


According to Red Cross spokesman Frederik Barkenhammar, the main reason for the reluctance to give is America's relative wealth. "The US isn't a developing country," he said.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2005 08:06 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
I didn't mean to imply at all that the donations of food were not welcome. I think the generosity of other nations to our crisis is wonderful. All I meant to say was that in looking at the immediate reaction after the hurricane, the problem was in getting needed food, water, and law enforcement to the people that needed it. The food we had, plenty of it, wasn't able to be given to those in dire straights, apparently due to the actions of local government.


According to Red Cross spokesman Frederik Barkenhammar, the main reason for the reluctance to give is America's relative wealth. "The US isn't a developing country," he said.


That's understandable ... and perhaps the reason for the reluctance to accept.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 06/26/2024 at 10:27:21