The new definition of antisemitism is transforming America – and serving a Christian nationalist plan
Itamar Mann and Lihi Yona
Redefining antisemitism in the law was never about Jewish safety. It is about consolidating authoritarian power under the veneer of minority protection
In 1919, Jacob Israël de Haan, an Orthodox Jewish queer poet and lawyer, arrived in British Mandate Palestine from the Netherlands. Despite his initial sympathies with Zionism, within a few years de Haan would become an outspoken critic of the movement. Driven by what he called a “natural feeling for justice”, he advocated for “another Jewish community in Palestine” – one that sought cooperation with the Arab-Palestinian community. His steadfast opposition to mainstream Zionism made de Haan a controversial figure, drawing the ire of Zionist leadership. On 30 June 1924, de Haan was assassinated by a member of the Zionist organization Haganah.
This political assassination represented not merely the elimination of one man, but a portentous statement about which perspectives would be tolerated in the emerging political landscape. A century later, we are witnessing a similar troubling pattern. As attacks against universities and intimidation of Palestinian activists become ever more rife, those who challenge Zionist orthodoxy – whether out of political conviction, religious belief or ethical principle – face exclusion, vilification and worse. This time, the main tool is a sweeping legal redefinition of antisemitism in American law and policy.
Leo Terrell, the civil rights attorney in charge of President Donald Trump’s antisemitism task force, shared a post on the social platform X Friday from a notorious white supremacist leader.
“Trump has the ability to revoke someone’s Jew card,” said the post, which included a video of the president saying that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is “not Jewish anymore. He’s a Palestinian.” The author of the post was Patrick Casey, who led Identity Evropa, a now-defunct organization founded in 2016 to promote the “Nazification of America.”
The group called on Trump supporters to become “racially aware and Jew Wise.” Casey was part of its presence at the deadly 2017 far-right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, according to the Anti-Defamation League, and took control of it a few months later.
In January, Terrell was nominated to serve in the civil rights division of the US justice department. In February, the Trump administration announced that Terrell would lead “a multi-agency Task Force to Combat Antisemitism”, focused on college protests over Israel’s war in Gaza.
Terrell said: “Antisemitism in any environment is repugnant to this nation’s ideals. The department takes seriously our responsibility to eradicate this hatred wherever it is found. The Task Force to Combat Antisemitism is the first step in giving life to President Trump’s renewed commitment to ending antisemitism in our schools.”
Now, attention to Terrell’s social media habits comes amid controversy regarding the arrest and detention of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia student and protest organizer. Khalil is being held for deportation under an obscure provision of immigration law but has not been charged with wrongdoing.
Raw Story, a progressive site, first noted that after sharing Casey’s tweet, Terrell shared another by Keith and Kevin Hodge, podcasters the advocacy group Stop Antisemitism said have “taken a puzzling antisemitic turn”, including “admitting to listening to Hitler’s speeches … wishing America had a leader like him”.
Terrell has not commented. The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a comment request.
On March 10, three days after the Trump administration canceled federal grants and contracts worth $400 million at Columbia University, the Department of Education sent a letter to sixty universities and colleges warning of similar consequences if they did not protect the safety of their Jewish students, including “uninterrupted access to campus facilities and educational opportunities.” This was accompanied by a statement from the secretary of education, Linda McMahon, which said, in part, that the Jewish students at these universities and colleges “continue to fear for their safety amid the relentless antisemitic eruptions that have severely disrupted campus life for more than a year.”
I have spent my teaching career at three of these schools: Pacific Lutheran University in Tacoma, Washington, where I taught for twenty-five years; the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where I taught for fifteen years; and the University of Washington in Seattle, where in retirement I taught as a visiting professor for two quarters. At all of them I regularly taught a highly enrolled course on the history of the Holocaust. During my career I also published eight books on Nazi Germany and the Holocaust, three of which won the National Jewish Book Award in the Holocaust category. In short, I am not unfamiliar with the phenomenon of antisemitism as it has manifested itself in history.
In 2016 President Trump’s election campaign produced two notorious ads: one featuring Hillary Clinton against a background of hundred-dollar bills and a Star of David, and another promising protection against global special interests and featuring the portraits of three Jewish financiers, Janet Yellen, George Soros, and Lloyd Blankfein. Both ads were blatant renditions of the classic antisemitic smear of Jewish money and Jewish financiers as the sources of power behind an opponent. In August 2017, at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, demonstrators marched with swastika and Confederate flags in a Nazi-style torchlit parade, chanting the Nazi slogans “Blood and Soil” and “Jews will not replace us.” Responding to this incident, Trump found there to be “fine people” on “both sides.”
After the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, which attempted to overturn the legal election of his opponent, Trump praised those sentenced and jailed as “political hostages” and “patriots.” He did not say whether those labels applied to the protesters wearing sweatshirts that said “CAMP AUSCHWITZ,” or those seen elsewhere wearing what seems to be the Proud Boy version, “6MWE” (6 Million Weren’t Enough). Since he had dinner at Mar-a-Lago in November 2022 with the self-proclaimed antisemite Kanye West and the leading Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes, Trump is apparently not disturbed by such company or sentiments. And in the run-up to the 2024 election, he proclaimed that if he lost, it would be because too many American Jews had failed to vote for him—once again a classic antisemitic tactic: if things go wrong, blame the Jews.
In short, if the Trump administration were truly concerned about antisemitism, it could start in its own house. Instead the Department of Education, which Trump hopes to dismantle, is now seizing the pretext of antisemitism to wage a campaign whose real purpose is to defund, demoralize, and diminish higher education in the US. This is a campaign energized by the fact that the essential ethos and purpose of higher education stands in stark conflict with Trump’s alternate reality. “Trump World” is based on a paranoid imagination, an obsession with conspiracy theories, wishful thinking, and the pervasive and constant invention of disinformation and false statements immune to refutation by evidence and reason. In contrast, among their many functions, universities and colleges are the sites of scientific and medical research (dealing with such issues as climate change and vaccines) as well as the fact-based study of history and economics.
However regrettable incidents of antisemitism on American campuses have been, this must not obscure the broader issue. Universities and colleges must not impinge on the constitutionally guaranteed right of free speech for all citizens. They are obligated to protect the academic freedom of their faculty and students, just as they are obligated to ensure that faculty and students are treated with civility and respect and protected against harassment. What a university or college cannot do is try to protect its students from the anxiety produced by academic challenges or the political controversies that affect all society. The campus is not a sanctuary from discomfort.
In addition to being a major disseminator and legitimizer of antisemitism in American politics and promiscuously associating with neo-Nazi white supremacists, Trump has been an open advocate of unfettered violence against Palestinians. He has urged Israel to make a quick end to the Gaza conflict, by which he must mean that it need take no precautions to avoid noncombatant casualties. He has announced his intention for the US to take possession of Gaza for recreational development and to ethnically cleanse Gaza by sending its residents to other countries. At the Nuremberg trials after World War II, actions like these constituted crimes of aggression, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Germans who issued or obeyed orders to commit such criminal actions were sentenced to prison.
It is utterly contradictory but hardly surprising for Trump to feign indignation over the harassment of Jewish students while openly advocating criminal violence against Palestinians. His campaign against campus antisemitism is simply a hypocritical pretext for his assault on American higher education.
What must be will be. Israel must and will reclaim the land of their rightful inheritance and nothing that anyone one living on this planet can do, will stop it.
Instead of loving thy neighbour you spend all your time dividing people into sheep and goats, and if there weren't any Palestinians you'd look elsewhere for goats to condemn.
What you spout is a complete perversion of what Christ preached.
Ten Britons accused of committing war crimes while fighting for Israel in Gaza
Exclusive: Met to be handed dossier of evidence alleging crimes including killings of civilians and aid workers
A war crimes complaint against 10 Britons who served with the Israeli military in Gaza is to be submitted to the Met police by one of the UK’s leading human rights lawyers.
Michael Mansfield KC is one of a group of lawyers who will on Monday hand in a 240-page dossier to Scotland Yard’s war crimes unit alleging targeted killing of civilians and aid workers, including by sniper fire, and indiscriminate attacks on civilian areas, including hospitals.
The report, which has been prepared by a team of UK lawyers and researchers in The Hague, also accuses suspects of coordinated attacks on protected sites including historic monuments and religious sites, and forced transfer and displacement of civilians.
For legal reasons, neither the names of suspects, who include officer-level individuals, nor the full report are being made public.
Israel has persistently denied that its political leaders or military have committed war crimes during its assault on Gaza, in which it has killed more than 50,000 people, most of them civilians. The military campaign was in response to Hamas’s 7 October 2023 attack on southern Israel, in which more than 1,200 people, also mostly civilian, were killed and a further 250 taken hostage.
Mansfield, who is known for his work on landmark cases such as the Grenfell Tower fire, Stephen Lawrence and the Birmingham Six, said: “If one of our nationals is committing an offence, we ought to be doing something about it. Even if we can’t stop the government of foreign countries behaving badly, we can at least stop our nationals from behaving badly.
“British nationals are under a legal obligation not to collude with crimes committed in Palestine. No one is above the law.”
The report, which has been submitted on behalf of the Gaza-based Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) and the British-based Public Interest Law Centre (PILC), covers alleged offences committed in the territory from October 2023 to May 2024 and took six months to compile.
Each of the crimes attributed to the 10 suspects, some of whom are dual nationals, amounts to a war crime or crime against humanity, according to the report.
One witness, who was at a medical facility, saw corpses “scattered on the ground, especially in the middle of the hospital courtyard, where many dead bodies were buried in a mass grave”. A bulldozer “ran over a dead body in a horrific and heart-wrenching scene desecrating the dead”, the witness said. They also said a bulldozer demolished part of the hospital.
Sean Summerfield, a barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, who helped compile the dossier, said it was based on open-source evidence and witness testimony, which together presented a “compelling” case.
“The public will be shocked, I would have thought, to hear that there’s credible evidence that Brits have been directly involved in committing some of those atrocities,” he said, adding that the team wanted to see individuals “appearing at the Old Bailey to answer for atrocity crimes”.
The report says Britain has a responsibility under international treaties to investigate and prosecute those who have committed “core international crimes”.
Section 51 of the International Criminal Court Act 2001 states that it “is an offence against the law of England and Wales for a person to commit genocide, a crime against humanity, or a war crime”, even if it takes place in another country.
Raji Sourani, the director of the PCHR, said: “This is illegal, this is inhuman and enough is enough. The government cannot say we didn’t know; we are providing them with all the evidence.”
Paul Heron, the legal director of the PILC, said: “We’re filing our report to make clear these war crimes are not in our name.”
Scores of legal and human rights experts have signed a letter of support urging the war crimes team to investigate the complaints.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace