2
   

21st Century antisemitism via Christian fundamentalism.

 
 
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2025 07:27 am
The following is an essay by two Jewish academics about antisemitism today as reinterpreted by the Trump administration. It's a very long article, but well worth the read.

Quote:
The new definition of antisemitism is transforming America – and serving a Christian nationalist plan
Itamar Mann and Lihi Yona

Redefining antisemitism in the law was never about Jewish safety. It is about consolidating authoritarian power under the veneer of minority protection

In 1919, Jacob Israël de Haan, an Orthodox Jewish queer poet and lawyer, arrived in British Mandate Palestine from the Netherlands. Despite his initial sympathies with Zionism, within a few years de Haan would become an outspoken critic of the movement. Driven by what he called a “natural feeling for justice”, he advocated for “another Jewish community in Palestine” – one that sought cooperation with the Arab-Palestinian community. His steadfast opposition to mainstream Zionism made de Haan a controversial figure, drawing the ire of Zionist leadership. On 30 June 1924, de Haan was assassinated by a member of the Zionist organization Haganah.

This political assassination represented not merely the elimination of one man, but a portentous statement about which perspectives would be tolerated in the emerging political landscape. A century later, we are witnessing a similar troubling pattern. As attacks against universities and intimidation of Palestinian activists become ever more rife, those who challenge Zionist orthodoxy – whether out of political conviction, religious belief or ethical principle – face exclusion, vilification and worse. This time, the main tool is a sweeping legal redefinition of antisemitism in American law and policy.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/mar/23/antisemitism-redefinition-jewish-safety-christian-nationalism-democracy

When you factor in the following about Leo Terrell, Trump's new antisemitism Tsar the story gets even worse.

Quote:
Leo Terrell, the civil rights attorney in charge of President Donald Trump’s antisemitism task force, shared a post on the social platform X Friday from a notorious white supremacist leader.

“Trump has the ability to revoke someone’s Jew card,” said the post, which included a video of the president saying that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is “not Jewish anymore. He’s a Palestinian.” The author of the post was Patrick Casey, who led Identity Evropa, a now-defunct organization founded in 2016 to promote the “Nazification of America.”

The group called on Trump supporters to become “racially aware and Jew Wise.” Casey was part of its presence at the deadly 2017 far-right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, according to the Anti-Defamation League, and took control of it a few months later.


https://forward.com/fast-forward/704866/leo-terrell-patrick-casey-antisemitism/

Quote:
In January, Terrell was nominated to serve in the civil rights division of the US justice department. In February, the Trump administration announced that Terrell would lead “a multi-agency Task Force to Combat Antisemitism”, focused on college protests over Israel’s war in Gaza.

Terrell said: “Antisemitism in any environment is repugnant to this nation’s ideals. The department takes seriously our responsibility to eradicate this hatred wherever it is found. The Task Force to Combat Antisemitism is the first step in giving life to President Trump’s renewed commitment to ending antisemitism in our schools.”

Now, attention to Terrell’s social media habits comes amid controversy regarding the arrest and detention of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia student and protest organizer. Khalil is being held for deportation under an obscure provision of immigration law but has not been charged with wrongdoing.

Raw Story, a progressive site, first noted that after sharing Casey’s tweet, Terrell shared another by Keith and Kevin Hodge, podcasters the advocacy group Stop Antisemitism said have “taken a puzzling antisemitic turn”, including “admitting to listening to Hitler’s speeches … wishing America had a leader like him”.

Terrell has not commented. The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a comment request.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/17/leo-terrell-trump-neo-nazi-tweet

My take is as follows, any criticism of Israel, or support of Palestine, especially on university campuses, is antisemitic.

Liking Hitler, and quoting the, (repeatedly debunked Russian Tsarist forgery,) Protocols of Zion in order to promote some conspiracy theory is fine and dandy, not to mention all the antisemitic anti vaccination stuff out there.
 
jespah
 
  3  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2025 03:51 pm
@izzythepush,
I suspect a lot of the fanning of these particular flames is being done, in part, with an endgame in mind of undermining the Democratic party.

MAGA cuts the GOP in two, and this has the potential to cut the Democratic party in two. After all, what better way to stick it to the left than to alienate and demonize a reliable blue state voting bloc? If it roils college campuses (which it has been), then all the better for our pals Putin and Xi.

I think folks do need to understand that if you're not Jewish and you think you can define antisemitism, it's a lot like thinking you can define anti-Black racism if you're not Black. It's…not your experience.

In addition, I think it's vital to keep in mind that certain voices are being amplified because they fit a far-left narrative. And while I feel there's a push by Putin and Xi to amplify this stuff, there's now a far stronger push to amplify coming from the extremely radical left. But the voices being amplified are in a really small minority of the Jewish population. And they're being amplified in order to try to legitimize certain radical messages. For Putin and Xi, it's a dream come true: other people to do their dirty work for them.

Here's where anti-Israel and anti-Zionist 'talking points' amount to antisemitism — per Wikipedia, as of 2023, a good 46% of the world's Jews lived in Israel. And around 73% of Israelis are Jews. So, being against Israel's existence (which is all that Zionism is, the belief that there should be a Jewish homeland, and it should be in Israel) means you're essentially against most Jews. After all, you don't have to live in Israel to feel it should have a right to exist.

Judaism is both a religion and an ethnicity. As a religion, it's chockful of references to going to Israel and/or Jerusalem. Hell, Passover starts on April 12th this year. And every single seder (unless you're actually in Jerusalem) ends with "Next year in Jerusalem." And we really mean Jerusalem, not some other place where misguided but presumably well-meaning folks think Jews should just pack up and go to, in order to stop the wars in the Middle East.

Funny how no one seems to think that conflicts in, say, Sudan, mean all the Sudanese people should be relocated to, say, Brazil, and then we'll all be happy and sing Kumbaya.

That kind of simplistic, thinly-veiled hostility is only reserved for Jews.

BTW according to a recent Pew study, even back in 2021, most Jews were supportive of Israel but not of its government. A lot of us are angry at what's going on, and we want it to stop already.

We've also experienced, per the ADL, over 10,000 reported incidents of antisemitism. And, many of the Jews I know have either hidden Jewish stars they wear (or haven't worn them at all) and/or have unfriended people, both online and in person, who've essentially told us that our very existence is offensive to them and the world would be so much better if we were all just to curl up and die.

After all, what do you think From the river to the sea really means? Hint: it's not a two-state solution. It's a one-state solution. A final solution, if you will.

Antisemitism never went away. It never does.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Mar, 2025 05:24 pm
@jespah,
Thanks for such a detailed response, I'll get back to you tomorrow.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2025 06:36 am
@jespah,
Sorry, I've got a lot on right now, I'll give you a considered response at the weekend

Thanks.
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2025 07:55 am
@izzythepush,
Oh my gosh, no rush.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2025 06:07 pm

Trump, Antisemitism & Academia


If the Trump administration were truly concerned about antisemitism, it would start in its own house.

Christopher R. Browning wrote:
On March 10, three days after the Trump administration canceled federal grants and contracts worth $400 million at Columbia University, the Department of Education sent a letter to sixty universities and colleges warning of similar consequences if they did not protect the safety of their Jewish students, including “uninterrupted access to campus facilities and educational opportunities.” This was accompanied by a statement from the secretary of education, Linda McMahon, which said, in part, that the Jewish students at these universities and colleges “continue to fear for their safety amid the relentless antisemitic eruptions that have severely disrupted campus life for more than a year.”

I have spent my teaching career at three of these schools: Pacific Lutheran University in Tacoma, Washington, where I taught for twenty-five years; the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where I taught for fifteen years; and the University of Washington in Seattle, where in retirement I taught as a visiting professor for two quarters. At all of them I regularly taught a highly enrolled course on the history of the Holocaust. During my career I also published eight books on Nazi Germany and the Holocaust, three of which won the National Jewish Book Award in the Holocaust category. In short, I am not unfamiliar with the phenomenon of antisemitism as it has manifested itself in history.

In 2016 President Trump’s election campaign produced two notorious ads: one featuring Hillary Clinton against a background of hundred-dollar bills and a Star of David, and another promising protection against global special interests and featuring the portraits of three Jewish financiers, Janet Yellen, George Soros, and Lloyd Blankfein. Both ads were blatant renditions of the classic antisemitic smear of Jewish money and Jewish financiers as the sources of power behind an opponent. In August 2017, at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, demonstrators marched with swastika and Confederate flags in a Nazi-style torchlit parade, chanting the Nazi slogans “Blood and Soil” and “Jews will not replace us.” Responding to this incident, Trump found there to be “fine people” on “both sides.”

After the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, which attempted to overturn the legal election of his opponent, Trump praised those sentenced and jailed as “political hostages” and “patriots.” He did not say whether those labels applied to the protesters wearing sweatshirts that said “CAMP AUSCHWITZ,” or those seen elsewhere wearing what seems to be the Proud Boy version, “6MWE” (6 Million Weren’t Enough). Since he had dinner at Mar-a-Lago in November 2022 with the self-proclaimed antisemite Kanye West and the leading Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes, Trump is apparently not disturbed by such company or sentiments. And in the run-up to the 2024 election, he proclaimed that if he lost, it would be because too many American Jews had failed to vote for him—once again a classic antisemitic tactic: if things go wrong, blame the Jews.

In short, if the Trump administration were truly concerned about antisemitism, it could start in its own house. Instead the Department of Education, which Trump hopes to dismantle, is now seizing the pretext of antisemitism to wage a campaign whose real purpose is to defund, demoralize, and diminish higher education in the US. This is a campaign energized by the fact that the essential ethos and purpose of higher education stands in stark conflict with Trump’s alternate reality. “Trump World” is based on a paranoid imagination, an obsession with conspiracy theories, wishful thinking, and the pervasive and constant invention of disinformation and false statements immune to refutation by evidence and reason. In contrast, among their many functions, universities and colleges are the sites of scientific and medical research (dealing with such issues as climate change and vaccines) as well as the fact-based study of history and economics.

However regrettable incidents of antisemitism on American campuses have been, this must not obscure the broader issue. Universities and colleges must not impinge on the constitutionally guaranteed right of free speech for all citizens. They are obligated to protect the academic freedom of their faculty and students, just as they are obligated to ensure that faculty and students are treated with civility and respect and protected against harassment. What a university or college cannot do is try to protect its students from the anxiety produced by academic challenges or the political controversies that affect all society. The campus is not a sanctuary from discomfort.

In addition to being a major disseminator and legitimizer of antisemitism in American politics and promiscuously associating with neo-Nazi white supremacists, Trump has been an open advocate of unfettered violence against Palestinians. He has urged Israel to make a quick end to the Gaza conflict, by which he must mean that it need take no precautions to avoid noncombatant casualties. He has announced his intention for the US to take possession of Gaza for recreational development and to ethnically cleanse Gaza by sending its residents to other countries. At the Nuremberg trials after World War II, actions like these constituted crimes of aggression, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Germans who issued or obeyed orders to commit such criminal actions were sentenced to prison.

It is utterly contradictory but hardly surprising for Trump to feign indignation over the harassment of Jewish students while openly advocating criminal violence against Palestinians. His campaign against campus antisemitism is simply a hypocritical pretext for his assault on American higher education.

nyrb
jespah
 
  3  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2025 07:26 pm
@hightor,
It sets up the potential for continual scapegoating.

Look what happened when Trump tried to protect them. We lost this and this and this!

Look what happened when schools and students lost their freedom of speech! This wouldn't have happened if not for the Jews!

Look what happened when MAGA attacked them! They turned it into a referendum about themselves! What about all these others who are victims...?


Etc. etc. ad nauseum.

It's similar energy to when the only livelihood open to Jews was moneylending—and we were blamed for being moneylenders.
The Anointed
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 26 Mar, 2025 01:24 am
@jespah,
What must be will be. Israel must and will reclaim the land of their rightful inheritance and nothing that anyone one living on this planet can do, will stop it.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Mar, 2025 12:36 pm
@jespah,
I respect your opinion, your judgement, and I respect you as a person.

I appreciate this is a very sensitive subject, far more for you than for me, and the last thing I would want to do is cause any offense.

First of all I take issue with your use of the terms far left narrative and extremely radical left. to dismiss minority opinion. It reminds me of the words Trump used to describe the judge ruling against his deportations.

What is considered left wing in America is viewed as mainstream over here, things like UHC are central. You have a far right government in power with a right wing opposition, I don't think The Democrats would be viewed as centre right over here.

With the exception of a few solitary voices like AOC, the Democrats are solidly right wing, very much like the Conservatives, remember how well David Cameron and Barack Obama got on?

I don't consider the ADL to be an objective source in regards the Israel Palestine situation.

(I still have a lot of points to make, and will continue later.

If you respond to anything I've said here, I will get back to you, but not until I've finished responding to this post.)

Thanks for your patience.
0 Replies
 
The Anointed
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 26 Mar, 2025 06:54 pm
@The Anointed,
Quote:
What must be will be. Israel must and will reclaim the land of their rightful inheritance and nothing that anyone one living on this planet can do, will stop it.


The Book of Jubilees Chapter 8: When Noah divided the Land among his three sons, Shem received the middle portion, from the delta of the river of Egypt, north to Lebanon and east to India, while Ham received the land of Africa to the south, and Japheth received the land to the north of Lebanon, which according to the book of Jubilees 8: 30; It is said that the Land of Japheth included the five great islands and a great land in the north. But it is cold, and the land of Ham is Hot, and the land of Shem (The middle son) is neither hot nor cold, but it is of blended cold and heat.

The sons of Noah then divided their portion of land among their sons, and it is written in Jubilees 9: 14; “And thus the sons of Noah divided unto their sons in the presence of Noah their father, and he bound them all by an oath, imprecating a curse on everyone who sought to seize the portion that had not fallen to him by lot. And they all said, ‘So be it; so be it,’ for themselves and for their sons forever throughout their generations til the day of judgement, etc.”

Then in chapter 10: 29; we read; “And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river Egypt, that it was very good, and he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (That is to) the sea, and he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, eastward and westward from the border of the Jordan and from the border of the sea. And Ham his father, and Cush and Mizraim, his brothers said unto him: ‘Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, and which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if thou dost do so, thou and thy sons will fall in the land and be accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled; and by sedition will thy children fall, and thou shalt be rooted out forever, etc.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2025 03:00 pm
@jespah,
I accept I can't define what is and what is not antisemitic, but I have studied civil rights and workplace discrimination and can say what it is that motivates me and other supporters of Palestinian self determination.

Islam does not have the same shocking history of antisemitism that Christianity does. Under the Islamic Caliphate Jewish people were treated as second class citizens, but then again so were Christians, but both were afforded certain protections and rights that non Abrahamic faiths did not.

Unlike European antisemitism which is based on lies, scapegoating and conspiracy theories, the Palestinians have just cause to resent the Israelis. It's an anti colonialism, anti occupation movement similar to the anti apartheid movement, the main difference being we weren't labelled bigots for opposing apartheid.

There was supposed to be a two state solution this was what both sides were touting as the only solution, but since the murder of Yitzhak Rabin almost thirty years ago there has been no movement whatsoever.

During this time progressive right wing governments have paid lip service to the two state solution while creating facts on the ground making a two state solution less viable by the day.

All occupying forces have a tendency to regard those they are occupying with contempt. British troops in Kenya during the Mau Mau uprising, American troops in Vietnam and both US and UK forces in Iraq and Afghanistan have perpetrated atrocities and war crimes.

The longer the occupation goes on the worse it gets. Palestinians are treated to daily humiliations, denied medical care, travel etc. while settlers perpetrate violence against the civilian population with impunity.

The atrocities perpetrated by Hamas in October 2023 are a direct consequence of a stalled peace process and the occupation. Since then the Israeli response has been entirely disproportionate, Gaza has been reduced to rubble, aid workers, medical workers UN and journalists have all been targetted. Doctors have been tortured, civilians including children are being used as human shields and the population is being starved to death. Israel is accused of genocide by the ICC.

Netanyahu wants a forever war, he's facing corruption charges and possible jail terms once his term ends, which is why he is becoming more autocratic and reliant on the far right members of the coalition. The vast majority of hostages returned home alive is a result of negotiations, not military action.

They were always an excuse for Netanyahu.

The above is what motivates me and those around me, and what I resent is my concern being the human rights of Palestinians being depicted as hatred towards all Jewish people, not just Israelis.

We have never called for the destruction/dismantling of Israel, we wanted the occupation of the West Bank and the siege of Gaza to end.

(I'm sorry that I've not been able to respond to your concerns about Israel's right to exist, and what from the river to the sea actually means other than the above sentence. I'll do that in my next post, thanks for your patience.)
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2025 01:15 pm
@jespah,
As far as pleasing Xi and Putin goes, Trump's actions in Ukraine only need a bow for Putin, and the withdrawl of aid in Africa and South America has allowed Xi to fill in the gap.

Both a far greater gifts to Russia and China respectively.

And from this side of the Atlantic the US doesn't look that different from China and Russia, and of the three, Putin, Trump and Xi, Xi seems the more reasonable.

I accept what you said about Sudan, but that is largely the result of Western indifference as opposed to arming and cheering one side on.

It's been said that no country has a right to exist, people have a right to exist, countries are just political entities.

Nobody mourns the loss of Sarawak, which is now part of Malaysia, the Sarawackians didn't just disappear, they became Malaysian.

The loss of a country doesn't necessitate the loss of its people. Even Iran, the most outspoken critic of Israel, has a Jewish mp representing the diaspora as guaranteed in their constitution.

Having said that, I accept that almost half the global population of Jewish people live in Israel and they make up almost three quarters of the population, so that Jewish identity is inevitably tied up with Israel which is why talk of its existance has such resonance.

What I find flawed with this process is that it completely maligns the Palestinian population, representing them as one impacable bloc that will accept nothing else than the eradication of Israel.

That is simply not true, the vast majority of Palestinians just want to live their lives in peace and security without the daily humiliation of an occupation. They're no different from the rest of us. The anti Hamas protests in Gaza yesterday show that Hamas does not speak for Palestine.

Israel funded Hamas from the get go as a policy of divide and rule, so it could undermine the Palestinian Authority. Netanyahu continued funding Hamas during the Gaza siege as a continuation of the policy.

Let's look at some realpolitik. Israel exists, it's the sole regional superpower. That won't change even if the US were to abandon Israel tomorrow. Israel has nuclear weapons, the most modern equipment and battle hardened troops albeit from a one sided conflict.

Israel isn't going anywhere, America is not going to drop its support anytime soon. None of the other countries or groups in the region is a threat to the existence of Israel, they may threaten its security, but the only countries capable of threatening its existence are the Troika, (US, Russia, China,) and none of those show any implication. Netanyahu is best buddies with Putin and Trump.

I think what from the river to the sea means depends on who is saying it. For a great many people it means an end to the occupation and the siege of Gaza.

For many it may mean the eradication of Israel, but that is not a realistic proposal. At best it's empty rhetoric, like when Lloyd George promised to hang the Kaiser when electioneering. People tend to adopt hardline rhetorical positions in times of crisis.

Why are so many concerned with what Palestinian protesters are saying, as opposed to what the IDF are doing? Hamas may talk the genocide talk, but Netanyahu walks the genocide walk. What about Palestine's right to exist, or more importantly Palestinians' rights to exist?

I'm sorry but the existance of Israel is a straw man, Israel will continue to exist for the forseeable future regardless of how many people chant from the river to the sea.

(I've got one more point to make about the possible consequences of Netanyahu aligning himself with far right white supremacists and Christian fundamentalists, and then I'm done. Thanks for bearing with me.)

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2025 06:37 pm
@jespah,
Criminalising peaceful protest against the human rights abuses perpetrated by the IDF does nothing to stop antisemitism.

If anything it builds up resentment and makes people more likely to believe Lash's horseshit like the United States of Israel and how the Rothschilds control everything.

It's part of Trump's attack on academic freedom, it's not just Israel/Palestine studies under attack but a whole swathe of disciplines, from LGBT, Civil Rights, Black History, Philosophy to Physics that are threatened. By focussing on pro Palestine protesters Trump ensures Jewish people get the blame.

These same people Netanyahu is reaching out to were the ones spouting antisemitic conspiracy nonsense during Covid, and claiming global warming is caused by Jewish lasers on the moon.

Netanyahu's antisemitism meeting was boycotted by leading Jewish people including the UK's chief rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis. Yale professor Jason Stanley whose grandparents fled Berlin in 1939 has lamented the rise of fascism and moved to Canada.

These new found allies to not have Jewish interests at heart, they're a convenient reason to perpetrate their Islamophobia with tales of Europe being taken over, which are not far from what they had been saying about the Jews.

I accept what you're saying about it being a convenient way to attack support for the Democrat party but I suspect it may be more than that.

Both Musk and Trump have messianic complexes. The religious right's support of Israel is conditional, based on them converting en masse once certain conditions have been reached.

When no conversions happen and Armageddon does not arrive, guess who will get the blame?

When you factor in Islamic prophecies about Syria being the place of the final battle you have the makings of a religious war every bit as pointless as the crusades were a thousand years ago.

(Thanks for your patience.)
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  3  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2025 08:18 pm
Wow, a lot to digest and I appreciate your very thorough response(s)!

I think it's pretty obvious that Jewish people (and Islamic folks as well) are being set up. Making the attack on Columbia (and other schools') speech and protests all about antisemitism is a way to shove a heavy, sharp wedge between the rest of what we call the left and the Jewish people. And I have seen some of my peers holding their noses as they consider embracing Trump.

Which I think is vile, idiotic, and is kind of like saying, "We all hate Hitler, but what about that Pol Pot guy?"

Just like Trump is a useful idiot for Putin and the religious right here, including Vance, etc., Jews who switch over to the Trump side are going to prove to be useful idiots. Until we're not anymore. Then we'll just be kicked under the bus.

Color me shocked.

Also, the fundamentalist Christians in the US (and I imagine elsewhere) just want Jews around long enough to usher in what they figure will be the End Times. Then we stop being useful to them, too, unless we convert. It's like the Inquisition for the 21st century. Their endgame is our eradication, but through conversion. I have no doubt that most have no idea what conversos are, or that Columbus voyaged to the west not so much for exploration's sake, but to finance the Inquisition, which was getting expensive. Columbus was a truly horrible person, a sadist—and that's probably one of the nicer things to say about him.

It's no great shock that MAGA and Project 2025 want to whitewash history. Otherwise, someone might point out that we're repeating it, and not in a good way.

There's more to reply but I am pretty dang tired - so will continue at some point (and feel free to nudge me if I'm taking too long; stuff gets lost in my inbox and in the corners of my overloaded mind).
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2025 06:01 am
@jespah,
There is a huge amount to deal with, I just appreciate your response, and I'm hardly in a position to tell you to hurry up.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2025 06:05 am
@The Anointed,
Your religious bigotry means you don't look upon Palestinians as human beings, but as an encumbrance.

Instead of loving thy neighbour you spend all your time dividing people into sheep and goats, and if there weren't any Palestinians you'd look elsewhere for goats to condemn.

What you spout is a complete perversion of what Christ preached.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2025 06:21 am
A bit of comic relief.

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » 21st Century antisemitism via Christian fundamentalism.
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/04/2025 at 09:14:37