29
   

The 47th President and the Post-Biden World

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 03:44 am
France has said it will not join Trump’s “Board for Peace.” France’s agriculture minister described the tariff threat as “blackmail.”

Trump's answer? He threatens 200% tariffs on wine if France declines to join the "Gaza Board of Peace".
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 04:09 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

Putin has been egging him on, saying it would make the USA the second largest country on the planet and that Trump would go down in history, blah, blah, blah. It's such a transparent attempt to help Trump destroy the Western alliance. Why do Republicans stand for this?


It seem incredible that Republicans in Congress have not stiffened their spines sufficiently to stop this power grab by such an incompetent person as Trump. Surely there are elected Republicans who see what is happening for what it is...and who realize they are the only elected people who can stop it.

The SCOTUS has become unimaginable.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  2  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 04:43 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

France has said it will not join Trump’s “Board for Peace.”


Let's look at some of the insane stipulations of the charter of this "Board for Peace."

Of course, Trump will be the Chairman:

Quote:
Article 3.2: Chairman

(a) Donald J. Trump shall serve as inaugural Chairman of the Board of Peace, and he shall separately serve as inaugural representative of the United States of America, subject only to the provisions of Chapter III.

(b) The Chairman shall have exclusive authority to create, modify, or dissolve subsidiary entities as necessary or appropriate to fulfill the Board of Peace’s mission.


The Chairman alone decides who will be a member:

Quote:
Article 2.1: Member States
Membership in the Board of Peace is limited to States invited to participate by the Chairman, and commences upon notification that the State has consented to be bound by this Charter, in accordance with Chapter XI.


Members get the privilege to pay USD $1,000,000,000 in cash funds or more directly to the Board of Peace to get Platinum Membership:

Quote:
(c) Each Member State shall serve a term of no more than three years from this Charter’s entry into force, subject to renewal by the Chairman. The three-year membership term shall not apply to Member States that contribute more than USD $1,000,000,000 in cash funds to the Board of Peace within the first year of the Charter’s entry into force.


Members then get a vote, but their votes are always subject to approval by the Chairman:

Quote:
(e) Decisions shall be made by a majority of the Member States present and voting, subject to the approval of the Chairman, who may also cast a vote in his capacity as Chairman in the event of a tie.


There's more, but it mostly seems like an organization that meant to be a fig leaf for implementing Trump's agenda, where Trump sets the agenda in a dictatorial way and members get the privilege to sit in and listen to him ramble in exchange for providing him with another billions-of-dollars slush fund.

0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 05:02 am
Quote:
Trump Invites Putin, Netanyahu to Join Peace Panel Mocked as ‘Board of Billionaires and War Criminals’

“This is a board of colonial administration, run by war criminals and kleptocrats,” said one critic. “It has zero legitimacy.”

Criticism of President Donald Trump’s so-called “Board of Peace” mounted Monday after the White House invited controversial figures—including two leaders wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes—to join the body tasked with supporting the management and reconstruction of Gaza.

Among Trump’s latest invitees to the board are Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Lukashenko has repressively ruled Belarus for over 30 years and supports Putin’s ongoing invasion and occupation of Ukraine, for which the Russian president is wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes. Netanyahu is also wanted by the ICC for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.

Trump—who has bombed 10 countries over his two terms in office—will chair the organization, whose executive board will also include former British leader and alleged war criminal Tony Blair, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, US Mideast Envoy Steve Witkoff, World Bank President Ajay Banga, billionaire businessman Marc Rowan, real estate investor and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner—who has publicly called for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza—and others.

“As if the people of Gaza have not suffered enough,” Global Justice Now director Nick Dearden said on Bluesky. “But Blair’s inclusion confirms the obvious—this is a board of colonial administration, run by war criminals and kleptocrats. It has zero legitimacy.”

Leaders of countries including Argentina, Canada, Egypt, France, Hungary, India, Italy, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Thailand, and Turkey were also invited to join the board. So was the European Union, with whom US relations are strained over issues including Trump’s tariffs and threats to invade Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory and NATO member.

Countries seeking permanent Board of Peace membership will be required to pay a $1 billion fee. A US official told the Associated Press that the fee would go toward reconstructing the obliterated Palestinian strip following more than two years of Israel’s genocidal assault and siege.

There are no Palestinians on the board.

[...]
Region Philbis
 
  2  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 05:32 am

Epstein files?

tap tap tap...
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 05:37 am
@Region Philbis,
Region Philbis wrote:
Epstein files?

tap tap tap...
Now I do think there really is something to it.

But Trump is now so much in his element that he is completely immersed in the reality he has created for himself. And that includes imposing it on the world.

Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 05:43 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
And now Trump has launched a blistering attack on Britain, calling Sir Keir Starmer’s plan to cede the Chagos Islands to Mauritius one of “great stupidity”.
The criticism comes just one day after Sir Keir Starmer called for calm among the US and Nato allies as tensions mount over Trump’s threats to Greenland.
Btw: Trump gave his blessing for the Chagos deal in February last year (Trump: “I have a feeling it is going to work out very well. I think we will be inclined to go along with your country.”), but now he has changed his mind as the row over Greenland spirals out of control.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 05:44 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
But Trump is now so much in his element that he is completely immersed in the reality he has created for himself. And that includes imposing it on the world.


It certainly feels like we've entered the "Mad King" phase of his reign.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 05:50 am
https://i.imgur.com/Gz7BOeK.png

Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 05:56 am
@old europe,
It is interesting to note that the image, which is apparently intended to mock EU leaders, also features Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. Meloni is actually considered to be the European with the best relationship with Trump and his administration. On the same day, Trump posted two messages about Rutte, praising him and thanking him for his efforts. The US president explicitly wrote that he had just had a ‘very good’ phone call with Rutte regarding Greenland.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also stands out in the picture, as his country does not actually belong to the EU.
Finally, Zelensky, who has not yet commented on Denmark, can also be seen. However, Denmark's Mette Frederiksen, who is actually Trump's main opponent on the Greenland issue, is not in the picture.

He posted a second manipulated image on Truth Social regarding the Greenland issue.

https://i.imgur.com/sDks2IUl.png
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 08:34 am
Quote:
The Catholic archbishop of the U.S. military services said it “would be morally acceptable to disobey” orders if troops considered them against their conscience as the Trump administration aims to acquire Greenland, intervenes in Venezuela and readies troops for a possible deployment to Minnesota.

Timothy P. Broglio is the latest public figure to suggest that American soldiers could disobey their orders. His comments also underscored the mounting concern being voiced by the first American pontiff, Pope Leo XIV, as well as his top cardinals in the United States, over the Trump administration’s foreign policy.

“Greenland is a territory of Denmark,” Broglio said in a BBC interview Sunday. “… It does not seem really reasonable that the United States would attack and occupy a friendly nation.”

Asked whether he was “worried” about the military personnel in his pastoral care, Broglio replied: “I am obviously worried because they could be put in a situation where they’re being ordered to do something which is morally questionable.”

“It would be very difficult for a soldier or a marine or a sailor to by himself disobey an order … but strictly speaking, he or she would be, within the realm of their own conscience, it would be morally acceptable to disobey that order, but that’s perhaps putting that individual in an untenable situation — and that’s my concern,” he added.

Broglio, an American, has since 2007 served as the Vatican’s senior cleric overseeing the D.C.-based archdiocese of the U.S. military. He is the former president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and is a known conservative.
[...]
Members of the military take an oath to the Constitution, not the president. They are obligated to not follow “manifestly unlawful orders,” but such situations are rare and legally fraught, The Washington Post reported, and military personnel can face punishment by court-martial procedures for failing to obey lawful orders.
[...]
Broglio’s comments echoed concerns made in a joint statement Monday by the three highest-ranking U.S. Catholic archbishops, warning that “the moral foundation for America’s actions in the world” had been thrown into question by a resurgence in the use or threat of military force, including in Venezuela and Greenland.
[...]
In the days after the U.S. operation in Venezuela to capture Nicolás Maduro, and after Trump said he was now “in charge” of that nation, the pope insisted on respect for Venezuela’s sovereignty.

In a Jan. 9 meeting with diplomats in Vatican City, Leo, while not mentioning the U.S. directly, decried a new era in which multilateralism is being replaced by “a zeal for war” and where “peace is sought through weapons as a condition for asserting one’s own dominion.”
WP
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 09:11 am
Trump threatens Denmark with taking control of Greenland. In light of this situation, the Danish pension fund AkademikerPension has announced that it will sell US government bonds worth more than 100 million US dollars.

The fund cites the weak financial situation of the US government as the reason for this decision.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 12:00 pm
"The NATO countries don't have to pull a trigger to destroy the U.S. military..."
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 12:23 pm
@hightor,
Finance Minister Scott Bessent, who appeared in Davos today as a kind of Trump translator, said that Trump simply feared that another country could conquer the island. ‘And no other country will control Greenland if the US controls Greenland.’
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jan, 2026 01:18 pm
@old europe,
old europe wrote:
Quote:
“This is a board of colonial administration, run by war criminals and kleptocrats,” said one critic. “It has zero legitimacy.”
It's actually very similar to the "Imperial Chamber Court" (Reichskammergericht) established at the end of the 15th century: the composition was determined by both the Holy Roman Emperor and the subject states of the Empire. Within this court, the Emperor appointed nearly all and everyone as he could fire them.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Wed 21 Jan, 2026 03:15 am
Quote:
World leaders are gathered at the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, which is taking place from January 19 to January 23. Trump is scheduled to go to the meeting in person for the first time since 2020, although now, with him still in the U.S., his social media account has been posting wildly.

Just after midnight, the account posted that Trump had “a very good telephone call with Mark Rutte, the Secretary General of NATO, concerning Greenland. I agreed to a meeting of the various parties in Davos, Switzerland. As I expressed to everyone, very plainly, Greenland is imperative for National and World Security. There can be no going back—On that, everyone agrees!” Shortly after, the account posted an AI image of world leaders sitting in front of Trump’s desk in the Oval Office with a large picture of North America entirely covered with stars and stripes to indicate American ownership—including Canada, as well as Greenland. The flag also covers Venezuela.

Then the account posted an image of Trump with Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio next to him as he stands on what looks to be an arctic landscape, holding a U.S. flag waving above a sign that reads: “GREENLAND—US TERRITORY EST. 2026.”

Later on, it would post private text messages to Trump from Rutte and French president Emmanuel Macron, mocking their attempts at diplomacy, and repost a message reading: “at what point are we going to realize the enemy is within [angry emoji]. China and Russia are the bogeymen when the real threat is the U.N., NATO, and [Islam].”

And then the account posted: “No single person, or President, has done more for NATO than President Donald J. Trump. If I didn’t come along there would be no NATO right now!!! It would have been in the ash heap of History. Sad, but TRUE!!! President DJT”

But seizing Greenland was not the only thing on the mind of administration officials. The account’s posts suggest they are worried about Trump’s declining popularity. It launched an attack on Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook, whom the administration is targeting for alleged mortgage fraud, just before it claimed that Trump was lowering mortgage rates. Later, the account would post a short video of Trump under which the chyron read: “I AM STANDING UP FOR AMERICAN AUTOWORKERS,” although the video was of him promising to stop all federal payments to “sanctuary cities” on February 1.

Then it bopped over to claiming that the people resisting ICE violence in Minnesota are “agitators and insurrectionists. These people are professionals! No person acts the way they act. They are highly trained to scream, rant, and rave, like lunatics, in a certain manner, just like they are doing. They are troublemakers who should be thrown in jail, or thrown out of the Country.” The first to go, he said, should be Democratic governor Tim Walz and Democratic representative Ilhan Omar, both of whom he called corrupt. Later, the account insisted that Democratic governor of California Gavin Newsom is also corrupt.

Later, the account posted that “[t]he Department of Homeland Security and ICE must start talking about the murderers and other criminals that they are capturing and taking out of the system. They are saving many innocent lives! There are thousands of vicious animals in Minnesota alone, which is why the crime stats are, Nationwide, the BEST EVER RECORDED! Show the Numbers, Names, and Faces of the violent criminals, and show them NOW. The people will start supporting the Patriots of ICE, instead of the highly paid troublemakers, anarchists, and agitators! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN”

Then the account turned to reposting long-debunked lies about the 2020 presidential election. It reposted claims that there was voter fraud in Nevada (there wasn’t), that Dominion Voting Machines flipped 435,000 votes from Trump to Biden (they didn’t), that China had rigged the voting for Biden (it didn’t). It appears someone is thinking about the fact that Special Counsel Jack Smith, who investigated Trump’s attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, will be testifying in public on Thursday, January 22.

In Washington today, in a long, rambling speech before reporters, Trump appeared to try to bring his social media post directly to the media. The speech was supposedly to outline the accomplishments of his administration, and he brandished a large sheaf of papers held together with a binder clip, labeled “ACCOMPLISHMENTS,” both of which he later threw on the floor.

But Trump turned from it almost immediately to insist that agents from Immigration and Customs enforcement are not arresting and detaining American citizens, although they very publicly did so on Sunday, breaking into the home of U.S. citizen ChongLy “Scott” Thao without a warrant, holding him at gunpoint, marching him outside in subfreezing weather in just sandals and underwear, driving him around for an hour or two before dropping him back at his home, and then lying that members of his family are on the registered sex offender list.

Trump denied such abuses, claiming that in Minnesota, ICE is apprehending “bad people.” To illustrate his claims, he held up one photo after another of individuals above the label “WORST OF WORST” as he mumbled about how bad they were: “many murderers, many many murderers, people that murdered.” Aaron Rupar of Public Notice, who has watched and clipped Trump’s speeches for years, commented: “folks, this is some really weird sh*t. the president is not well.”

From there, Trump was off with the usual litany of complaints about former president Joe Biden, and familiar stories like this one:

“I should’ve gotten the Nobel Prize for each war, but I don’t say that. I saved millions and millions of people. And don’t let anyone tell you that Norway doesn’t control the shots, ok? It’s in Norway. Norway controls the shots. They’ll say, ‘We have nothing to do with it.’ It’s a joke. They’ve lost such prestige. Got all—that’s why I have such respect for Maria doing what she did. She said, ‘I don’t deserve the Nobel Prize, he does.’ When she got it, they named—they said, ‘Wow that’s amazing, I thought President Trump would get it.’”

Trump also had words about Jack Smith: “Deranged Jack sick Smith. He’s a sick son of a b*tch. They gave me the worst of the worst.”

Trump’s threats against Greenland and his promise to hit Europe with high tariffs if governments there don’t support his seizure of Greenland drove the U.S. stock market sharply downward today. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 870.74 points (1.76%), the S&P 500 was down 2.06%, and the Nasdaq Composite fell 2.39%, the worst day for all three of these major indexes since October.

Yesterday Tom Fairless of the Wall Street Journal reported that, contrary to Trump’s repeated assertions, U.S. consumers and importers—not foreign countries—are the ones who have paid for Trump’s tariff war. The Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German think tank, echoed the findings of Yale and Harvard Business School economists, confirming that American consumers and importers have absorbed 96% of the cost of Trump’s tariffs.

Trump’s threats against Europe are an entirely different kettle of fish, for as Konrad Putzier, Chao Deng, and Sam Goldfarb of the Wall Street Journal explain, the European Union is the biggest trading partner of the U.S., its largest investor, and its closest financial ally. European leaders are discussing whether to retaliate against the U.S. using the EU’S Anti-Coercion Instrument, nicknamed “the Bazooka,” which can restrict imports and exports to any country trying to coerce an EU member and can limit U.S. investment there.

In The Atlantic on January 18, Robert Kagan wrote that “Americans are entering the most dangerous world they have known since World War II” and warned they “are neither materially nor psychologically ready for this future. For eight decades, they have inhabited a liberal international order shaped by America’s predominant strength” and “have grown accustomed to the world operating in a certain way.”

European and Asian allies have cooperated with the U.S. on both defense and trade, while the power of those alliances has prevented serious challenges to that order. Global trade has generally been free, and oceans have been safe for travel both by humans and container ships. Nuclear weapons have been limited by international agreement. “Americans are so accustomed to this basically peaceful, prosperous, and open world that they tend to think it is the normal state of international affairs, likely to continue indefinitely,” Kagan wrote. “They can’t imagine it unraveling, much less what that unraveling will mean for them.”

In Davos today, Canada’s prime minister, Mark Carney, told the world, “We are in the midst of a rupture.” The rules-based international order is no longer an automatic route to prosperity and security, he said, as the world’s most powerful nations now use that system’s economic integration to coerce other countries.

In its place, Carney offered a different vision than the “world of fortresses” made up of major powers with spheres of influence that Trump and Russia’s president Vladimir Putin are trying to build.

If “middle powers” pursue a system he called “variable geometry,” he said, they can rebalance the world and help solve global problems while still building strength at home. His vision is a version of the “diplomatic variable geometry” of former U.S. secretary of state Antony Blinken, but Carney’s vision decenters the U.S., noting that middle powers must work together to be at the table to avoid being on the menu. Under a system of variable geometry, countries can develop infrastructure and trade at home, strengthening their own nations, while negotiating new international agreements, as Canada has done recently with China, Qatar, India, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Thailand, the Philippines, and Mercosur, a South American trade bloc made up of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

But for international affairs, variable geometry means creating international “coalitions for different issues based on common values and interests,” “coalitions that work issue by issue with partners who share enough common ground to act together. In some cases, this will be the vast majority of nations. What it’s doing is creating a dense web of connections across trade, investment, culture on which we can draw for future challenges and opportunities.”

“We know the old order is not coming back,” Carney said. “We shouldn’t mourn it. Nostalgia is not a strategy, but we believe that from the fracture we can build something bigger, better, stronger, more just. This is the task of the middle powers, the countries that have the most to lose from a world of fortresses and the most to gain from genuine cooperation.”

hcr
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  3  
Reply Wed 21 Jan, 2026 07:07 am

https://i.ibb.co/m5t37dKX/Screenshot-20260121-055122-Facebook.jpg
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Wed 21 Jan, 2026 07:19 am
@Region Philbis,
I really sort of hoped that our constant criticism and warnings about the potential consequences of his behavior might wake people up; I never wished to see our warnings vindicated. I feel bad for the younger generations who will have to listen to old codgers like me talking about the "good old days" and feebly shaking our fingers and croaking, "I told you so."
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Wed 21 Jan, 2026 07:26 am
Trump’s Politics Are Not America First. They’re Me First.

https://i.imgur.com/ZsMXh8H.jpg

Quote:
I have never trafficked in the conspiracy theories about Donald Trump and Russia. I never thought that he was a Russian asset or that Vladimir Putin had some financial leverage on him or sex tapes to blackmail him with. I have always believed it was much worse: that Trump, in his heart and soul, simply does not share the values of every other American president since World War II when it comes to what America’s role in the world should be and must be.

I have always believed that Trump has an utterly warped value set that is not grounded in any of our founding documents, but simply favors any leader who is strong, no matter what he does with that strength; any leader who is rich and can thus enrich Trump, no matter what the leader does with that money or how he got it; and any leader who will flatter him, no matter how obviously phony that flattery is.

As long as Putin the dictator checked all those boxes more than the democratic leader of Ukraine, Trump treated him as a friend — American interests and values be damned. Putin never even had to break a sweat to make Trump his chump.

For all those reasons Trump is the most un-American president in our history. It was obvious from the day Trump trashed Senator John McCain, an authentic American war hero and patriot, for having been shot down in combat and taken prisoner. What kind of American would denounce McCain, who was held captive for over five years in a North Vietnamese prison camp after spurning early release, knowing it would be used as propaganda? No American that I know.

Trump’s worst un-American impulses and intellectual laziness were contained in his first term in the White House by a group of serious advisers. This time around, there is no one to contain them. He has surrounded himself with sycophants. So, Trump is now basically running our country the way he ran his companies — as a one-man show free to make terrible deals.

That management style led to six bankruptcy filings by his companies. Unfortunately, today we’re all his shareholders, and I fear he is going to bankrupt us as a nation — morally for sure, if not one day financially and politically.

Trump’s behavior has become so reckless, so self-absorbed, so obviously contrary to American interests — as even Republicans have long defined them, let alone Democrats — that the question must be asked: Is America now being ruled by a mad king?

What American president would ever write the text that Trump wrote to Norway’s prime minister, Jonas Gahr Store, on Sunday, claiming that one reason he is pushing to acquire Greenland is that he was not awarded the Nobel Peace Prize? He wrote, “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.”

Read those words over slowly. They don’t scream “America first.” They scream “Me first.” They scream “I, Donald Trump, am ready to seize Greenland, at the price of breaking up the nearly 77-year-old NATO alliance, because the Nobel Committee did not give ME its peace prize last year” — ignoring the fact that the Norwegian government doesn’t control the awarding of the prize.

It would be one thing for Trump to say he is ready to break up NATO over a matter of geopolitical principle affecting the security of the American people. I can’t imagine what that would be, but I could at least imagine the possibility. What is unimaginable to me is an American president so obsessed with winning a Nobel Peace Prize to feed his ego and one-up his predecessor — as well as equal Barack Obama, who won the peace prize in 2009 — that he would be ready to wreck the whole NATO alliance and trading system with Europe because he did not get it.

I am trying to imagine a scene where Trump dictated that note to an aide, without shame, and that person sent it to the Norwegians — presumably without anyone in the White House hierarchy stopping it, without anyone saying: “Mr. President, are you crazy? You can’t put your personal ambition for a Nobel Prize ahead of the whole of the Atlantic alliance.”

But Trump can do that, because he obviously assigns little or no value to the blood and treasure and energy that generations of American soldiers, diplomats and presidents before him sacrificed in order to build that durable partnership with our European partners.

Let me put it in terms Trump should understand: If America were a company, you would say that a generation of American workers, executives and investors built the most successful, profitable and impactful corporation in the history of the world — the Atlantic/NATO alliance forged out of the ashes of World War II. With a relatively tiny investment in postwar Europe, known as the Marshall Plan, we created a healthy trading partner that helped make both America and Europe richer than ever; we helped to transform Europe from a continent known for nationalist, ethnic and religious wars into the biggest center of free markets, free people and the rule of law in the world — giving ourselves a powerful democratic wingman to help stabilize the world and contain Russia for the last three quarters of a century.

It’s true that Europe faces daunting challenges, from uncontrolled migration to overregulation to the rise of far-right parties. And yes, it often responds with indecision. And yes, there are legitimate security concerns in the Arctic. But generations of American statesmen and presidents understood the overriding importance of the U.S.-European compact and would never even contemplate sacrificing it over who has sovereignty in Greenland.

It is so obvious that only a pathological narcissist who insists on having his name on everything — from someone else’s Kennedy Center to someone else’s Nobel Peace Prize — would risk all of the above to seize Greenland, especially when you consider that we already have the right to operate bases in Greenland and station forward troops and missiles there. We also have the right to invest in extracting its minerals.

If indeed America were a company, the board of directors would have responded to behavior like Trump’s by announcing an “intervention” with the C.E.O.

Unfortunately, America’s board of directors, the Republican-led U.S. Congress, has been completely self-neutered. And so now, we the people, we the shareholders, are about to get stuck with the bill.

Meanwhile, America Inc.’s competitors simply cannot believe their luck. Since the end of World War II both Russia and China have understood the one big thing that Trump does not: America’s competitive advantage. While Russia and China had only vassals that they could order and pressure to join them in any geopolitical or geoeconomic competition with the United States, America had a secret weapon hiding in plain sight: allies who shared our values and were ready to do difficult things, like send their soldiers to fight and die, in our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. One of them was Denmark, which has sovereignty over Greenland.

Russia and China dreamed that one day something would happen where America would lose its allies and NATO would be fractured. Without economic allies, America could never be as influential in trade negotiations with China, and without America’s military might, NATO would be hard pressed to prevent Russia from retaking parts of Central and Eastern Europe that it lost control over after the fall of the Berlin Wall.

And then one day their dreams came true. The American people elected a man who, no matter what he tells us, is taking us to a future not of “America first,” but of “America alone” and “Me first.”

nyt
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Wed 21 Jan, 2026 09:36 am
Trump's speech in Davos
Trump in Davos – it was a performance of superlatives. Never before in the history of the World Economic Forum has a speech attracted such a crowd. Long before it began, the Congress Hall, which seats around 1,300 people, had to be closed due to overcrowding. One person in particular must have been pleased about this: Donald Trump.

These are the key points of his performance:

Superlatives for himself
Because if there's one thing the US president likes, it's superlatives – especially when they apply to himself. And he fired off a few more today. Trump boasted that he had sparked an ‘economic miracle’ in the US after taking over from Joe Biden. The stock market would double, he said. ‘We were a dead country, now we are the hottest country in the world.’

Criticism for others
As much praise as Trump had for himself, he had just as much criticism for everyone else. Canada, Europe, NATO? All ungrateful. And particularly ungrateful: Denmark, from whom he wants to take Greenland away by (almost) any means necessary.

Greenland again and again
‘All I want is a piece of ice,’ Trump said in Davos. He wants immediate negotiations on the purchase of Greenland. His aim is to build a protective shield to defend North America, the largest ‘golden dome’ ever seen (yet another superlative). But apparently no one wants to give him this ‘gigantic piece of ice’ unless he uses force. He assured everyone that he would not do so.

The threat remains
But can Europe really rely on Trump's assurances? This is a question that German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and the other NATO partners must ask themselves even after this speech. Especially since Trump sent the Europeans an undisguised threat regarding Greenland:
"You can say yes to Greenland, and we will greatly appreciate it. Or you can say no – and we will remember that." That does not sound like a conciliatory message.

(Includes translated passages from the SPIEGEL live report)
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/16/2026 at 04:37:40