@Real Music,
You would see A LOT more programs for youth. Folks aged
18 - 24 are notoriously low percentage voters.
Turnout by age cohort from 1988 to 2016 shows people aged 60+ (heh, that's me) voted on average around 70% of the time. Folks aged 18 - 29 never cracked 50% and tended to hover in the mid-30s percent.
Per
Wikipedia, in 2021, there were 43 million people in the US aged 15 - 24 (unfortunately, they don't seem to have a breakdown that eliminates the minors in this cohort), which works out to around 13% of the population.
Putting it all together (and ignoring the small year differences and lopping off 1/3 of the 15 - 24 group as being too young to vote), if the missing voters are added, we get:
18 - 24 about
15 M (43 M * .67 to get rid of 15 - 17 year olds, * .51 to account for missing voters)
25 - 34 about
20.25 M (45 M * .45 to account for missing voters)
35 - 44 about
17 M (43 M * .4 to account for missing voters)
45 - 54 about
16 M (41 M * .4 to account for missing voters)
55 - 64 about
13 M (43 M * .3 to account for missing voters)
65+ about
17 M (56 M * .3 to account for missing voters)
The cohort of ages 18 - 34 is a lot more than the 65+ cohort, about 80 M to 56 M. Youth programs and middle age programs don't happen because young people don't vote.
If you want to see student loans deferred or forgiven, get younger folks to vote. If you want to preserve abortion rights, get younger folks to vote. If you want expanded tax credits for people with minor children, better schools, or better long-term projects get funding (like eliminating fossil fuel dependency), then get younger folks to vote.
If you want more money to go to cancer care and Alzheimer's research, then embrace the status quo.