0
   

Ending Israel's alleged “Illegal-occupation” & “Illegal Settlements - In an Instant!

 
 
Reply Sat 28 Sep, 2024 07:10 am
Method for how to end both the alleged Israeli “Illegal-occupation” and alleged “Illegal Settlements” - In an Instant!:

The falsehood purporting an Israeli illegal-occupation of any part the Jewish ancestral homeland, comes from the anti-Semitic policies of the United Nations, and which therefore the U.N. should repeal forthwith.

An example of a different U.N. anti-Semitic policy subsequently repealed, was the U.N.'s falsehood that Zionism (Jewish nationalism) was form of racism:
https://www.nytimes.com/1991/12/17/world/un-repeals-its-75-resolution-equating-zionism-with-racism.html

Once the U.N. have repealed their illegal and illogical falsehood purporting an Israeli illegal-occupation, the U.N. should offer an apology to the Jewish people for the 56 years of the U.N.'s suffocating anti-Semitic trumped-up charge.

In the case of Israel, what then does "international law" from the U.N. mean?:
It refers to United Nations resolutions, policies (copied by the European Union and other countries such as the United Kingdom), and the consequential legal decisions of courts linked to the U.N., that create a chain of law falsely accusing the Jewish people of stealing their own ancestral-homeland of Israel and consequentially also therefore of building "illegal settlements".
The historical circumstances in which such Media articles and News reports are based, refer to Israel having recovered in 1967 its ancestral lands of "Judah and Samaria" (since known wrongly as "West Bank, the"), from the Jordanian illegal-occupiers.

The following is how the U.N. falsehood against Israel works:
> Falsely regarding Israel/the Jewish people as illegally-occupying "Judah and Samaria" ("West Bank, the") part of the Jewish ancestral-homeland;
> Then, based on that consequently, Israeli homes and villages (referred to in the Media (and strangely also in Israel) erroneously as "settlements"), within "Judah and Samaria" ("West Bank") become: "illegal in International law";
> Then, consequential U.N. Court decisions based in those biased U.N. policies.

How does the U.N. bias against Israel work?:

Israel is Re-established within the Jewish ancestral homeland.
To see that modern Israel is Re-established within the Jewish ancestral homeland the reader need only consult a map of the post-Biblical Jewish Hasmonean Kingdom, which included:
Judah and Samaria (which became known since 1948 as the "West Bank" due to Jordanian illegal-occupation);
and also included Gaza, and the Golan Heights,
Its capital was what is now known as EAST Jerusalem / “Old City”;
between 110 BCE / 754 BH and 63 BCE / 706 BH - Map:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4b/Hasmonean_kingdom.jpg

Accepted international constitutional law is that Laws must not be passed that are intrinsically-unjust that persecute a minority, as are the U.N. decisions against Israel, which falsely-validate the unverifiable-claims of the “Palestinian” Arabs.
An example of unjust-laws were the Nuremberg Laws of Nazi Germany which persecuted the Jews.

Such U.N. policies are illegal, being in conflict with the international treaty signed by the Israelis and “Palestinian” Arabs - the Oslo Accords which also constitute international law.

There has never been any indigenous “Palestine” / Arab sovereign state in the land of Israel upon which the “Palestinian” Arabs could base any claim to any part of Israel.

The “Palestinian Arabs” dropped the name “Arab” so you should not understand they mostly originate from Foreign-Arab-Migrant-Workers who came to the land of Israel just prior to, and during, the British Mandate - See “Arab Immigration to Historic Palestine: A Survey”, by Richard Mather:
https://richardmatherblog.wordpress.com/2015/05/


(I am always happy to debate with others if not Cancelled!)
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 167 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Sat 28 Sep, 2024 07:35 am
@Robert111333,
Quote:
The falsehood purporting an Israeli illegal-occupation of any part the Jewish ancestral homeland...

All across the world there are examples of ethnic groups who no longer reside in their "ancestral homeland". Some of these people were uprooted much more recently than were the Jews of the Levant. Wouldn't establishing a universal "right of return" be enormously disconcerting to international order?
Robert111333
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 28 Sep, 2024 11:04 am
@hightor,
Thanks "hightor" for your response.

In answer to your question:
Not really. Here's a source which will give the reader a handy list of those other countries that also have a Right of Return:


0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Ending Israel's alleged “Illegal-occupation” & “Illegal Settlements - In an Instant!
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/08/2024 at 09:20:37