JustWonders wrote:DontTreadOnMe wrote:JustWonders wrote:Why didn't the author of this thread post the article instead of just the link? I posted that portion of the article that was relevant to me.
jeez, who would dare. bbb gets spanked all the time for posting complete articles.
and don't you like the idea that you can actually go to the source and read the bonifide, unmanipulated article ?
I know how the MSM operates, though. I highly suspect some exaggeration on their part concerning the paragraph you've chosen to focus on.
but no exaggeration on in the paragraph you chose, right.
you guys can keep bashing the socalled "MSM" (read anything but fox and it's "contributers") all you want. but you are only fooling yourselves.
I understand why some here choose to give a pass to those in Crawford who choose to ignore the wishes and concise requests of certain family members. Cindy Sheehan does not speak for them. She knows that, but she just doesn't care.
are you claiming that MOVEamericaFORWARD-DOT-ORG speaks for all military families ?
My only comment concerned those families who have stated categorically that Cindy Sheehan does not speak for them and have asked that their loved ones' names not be exploited for her political purposes. She and her loony followers have ignored those requests.
as i understand it, it was taking the physical white cross that was objected to. they freely allowed a policeman to remove the nametags.
problem solved, right ?
i don't think i've ever heard sheehan claim that she spoke for all military familes. surely she knows that she does not, just as the maf group does not.