1
   

We must continue the killing & dying to justify the dying?

 
 
Reply Wed 24 Aug, 2005 11:52 am
August 24, 2005
My Private Idaho
By MAUREEN DOWD
New York Times

W. vacationed so hard in Texas he got bushed. He needed a vacation from his vacation.

The most rested president in American history headed West yesterday to get away from his Western getaway - and the mushrooming Crawford Woodstock - and spend a couple of days at the Tamarack Resort in the rural Idaho mountains.

"I'm kind of hangin' loose, as they say," he told reporters.

As The Financial Times noted, Mr. Bush is acting positively French in his love of le loafing, with 339 days at his ranch since he took office - nearly a year out of his five. Most Americans, on the other hand, take fewer vacations than anyone else in the developed world (even the Japanese), averaging only 13 to 16 days off a year.

W. didn't go alone, of course. Just as he took his beloved feather pillow on the road during his 2000 campaign, now he takes his beloved bike. An Air Force One steward tenderly unloaded W.'s $3,000 Trek Fuel mountain bike when they landed in Boise.

Gas is guzzling toward $3 a gallon. U.S. troop casualties in Iraq are at their highest levels since the invasion. As Donald Rumsfeld conceded yesterday, "The lethality, however, is up." Afghanistan's getting more dangerous, too. The defense secretary says he's raising troop levels in both places for coming elections.

So our overextended troops must prepare for more forced rotations, while the president hangs loose.

I mean, I like to exercise, but W. is psychopathic about it. He interviewed one potential Supreme Court nominee, Harvie Wilkinson III, by asking him how much he exercised. Last winter, Mr. Bush was obsessed with his love handles, telling people he was determined to get rid of seven pounds.

Shouldn't the president worry more about body armor than body fat?

Instead of calling in Karl Rove to ask him if he'd leaked, W. probably called him in to order him to the gym.

The rest of us may be fixated on the depressing tableau in Iraq, where the U.S. seems to be delivering a fundamentalist Islamic state into the dirty hands of men like Ahmad Chalabi, who conned the neocons into pushing for war, and his ally Moktada al-Sadr, the Shiite cleric who started two armed uprisings against U.S. troops. It was his militiamen who ambushed Casey Sheehan's convoy in Sadr City.

America has caved on Iraqi women's rights. In fact, the women's rights activists supported by George and Laura Bush may have to leave Iraq.

But, as a former C.I.A. Middle East specialist, Reuel Marc Gerecht, said on "Meet the Press," U.S. democracy in 1900 didn't let women vote. If Iraqi democracy resembled that, "we'd all be thrilled," he said. "I mean, women's social rights are not critical to the evolution of democracy."

Yesterday, the president hailed the constitution establishing an Islamic republic as "an amazing process," and said it "honors women's rights, the rights of minorities." Could he really think that? Or is he following the Vietnam model - declaring victory so we can leave?

The main point of writing a constitution was to move Sunnis into the mainstream and make them invested in the process, thereby removing the basis of the insurgency. But the Shiites and Kurds have frozen out the Sunnis, enhancing their resentment. So the insurgency is more likely to be inflamed than extinguished.

For political reasons, the president has a history of silence on America's war dead. But he finally mentioned them on Monday because it became politically useful to use them as a rationale for war - now that all the other rationales have gone up in smoke.

"We owe them something," he told veterans in Salt Lake City (even though his administration tried to shortchange the veterans agency by $1.5 billion). "We will finish the task that they gave their lives for."

What twisted logic: with no W.M.D., no link to 9/11 and no democracy, now we have to keep killing people and have our kids killed because so many of our kids have been killed already? Talk about a vicious circle: the killing keeps justifying itself.


Just because the final reason the president came up with for invading Iraq - to create a democracy with freedom of religion and minority rights - has been dashed, why stop relaxing? W. is determined to stay the course on bike trails all over the West.

This president has never had to pull all-nighters or work very hard, because Daddy's friends always gave him a boost when he flamed out. When was the last time Mr. Bush saw the clock strike midnight? At these prices, though, I guess he can't afford to burn the midnight oil.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 183 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Aug, 2005 12:07 pm
Our mission in Iraq has mutated
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
Our mission in Iraq has mutated
By IVAN GOLDMAN
GUEST COLUMNIST
Seattle PI.

Ivan Goldman, a former P-I editorial writer, lives in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif., and is a columnist for The Ring magazine. His son is serving in Iraq.[/u]

One of the oddest features of our strange, strange war in Iraq is that we're still trying to figure out the mission. Oil? Religious zealotry? Revenge? Glory? What?

Some critics say President Bush has failed to define just what it is we're trying to do there, but he and his handlers have defined it over and over. The trouble is, just about everyone understands by now that they've been lying all along. So media questioners twist themselves into pretzels trying to figure out some polite way of asking them to tell the truth, just once.

Each time Bush and the other members of his political rat pack alter their talking points they immediately spread the word to all those in the administration allowed to speak. And one element of the new instructions is to excise the latest excuse that's been exposed as bogus. Instead of admitting they were mistaken or not telling the truth, they just make the old excuse inoperable. We're supposed to erase it from our memory banks the same way they erase it from their latest explanation. Among reasons no longer operable are the specter of mushroom clouds, smallpox and nerve gas, plus the fact that Saddam Hussein gassed his own people (during the reign of Bush One). The al-Qaida-connections excuse receded for awhile, but it's back on the list because these days some of the people attacking our troops are in fact al-Qaida-connected. What's not mentioned is that they joined the cause only after we invaded Iraq, leaving a long trail of dead, disabled, homeless, unemployed residents who were supposed to thank us.

As Iraqis who used to be at the mercy of Saddam's bandits are now besieged by anyone with a Kalashnikov, a cause and a criminal mentality, we Americans hear that the latest mutation of our real mission is to create a democracy that will be a light of lights for the entire Mideast. So far this particular mission is giving an assist to those Iraqis seeking to shove the country into the pitiless horror of a Shiite theocracy that shows every sign of being even crazier and more intolerant than its Iranian model next door. Its leaders already are dispersing gangs that execute liquor store owners and beat women they perceive as disrespectful. They also murdered American reporter Steven Vincent after he reported these events in Basra in The New York Times.

Yes, some of our new allies are a little raw, but what the heck, this war already has brought us shoulder to shoulder with Uzbekistan dictator Islam Karimov, whose torture police have been known to boil people alive. So helping out a few more hideous totalitarians is no big deal.

Bush and his aggressively incompetent collection of business-suited bunglers paid to think up some kind of mission are running out of any that have even the slightest connection to reason or reality. That's why, exposed by tough, smart, bereaved mother Cindy Sheehan, they retreat to the Bush-bunker and speak to their base -- the greed-crazed tax haters, Christian ayatollahs, racists, gun worshippers and innocent but deluded souls who got Bush appointed in the first place. Those gangs of hardcore devotees who can't for the life of them spot any Bush mistakes are the folks Lincoln talked about when he said you can fool some of the people all of the time. They actually believe those of us who want the United States out of Iraq now are undermining our troops. But if we leave now or in five years, the result in Iraq will be just the same. The primary difference would be in the length of the casualty list.

So yes, there are people undermining our troops. But those of us seeking to bring them home now are not among them.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » We must continue the killing & dying to justify the dying?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/03/2024 at 09:30:29