Reply
Sun 30 Mar, 2003 05:47 am
It seems likely that, resulting from the invasion of Iraq, acts of revenge and terrorism in America and the U.K. are increasingly probable.
The dilemma: should terrorist suspects be considered innocent until proven guilty or guilty until proven innocent as supported by the Bush Administration?
No, I do not like the idea of "guilty until proven innocent" for any reason.
But I do think there has to be a "happy medium", somewhere between "guilty until proven innocent", and being squeaky-clean PC about how we handle our security.
This is another problem this administration has created for the US and the UK. Our freedoms are gonna suffer for it, and we can blame this administration for the many problems they have created for our future. c.i.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace