1
   

Blood Runs Red, Not Blue

 
 
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:11 am
New York Times Op-Ed Columnist
Blood Runs Red, Not Blue
By BOB HERBERT
Published: August 18, 2005

You have to wonder whether reality ever comes knocking on George W. Bush's door. If it did, would the president with the unsettling demeanor of a boy king even bother to answer? Mr. Bush is the commander in chief who launched a savage war in Iraq and now spends his days happily riding his bicycle in Texas.

The war is going badly and lives have been lost by the thousands, but there is no real sense, either at the highest levels of government or in the nation at large, that anything momentous is at stake. The announcement on Sunday that five more American soldiers had been blown to eternity by roadside bombs was treated by the press as a yawner. It got very little attention.

You can turn on the television any evening and tune in to the bizarre extended coverage of the search for Natalee Holloway, the Alabama teenager who disappeared in Aruba in May. But we hear very little about the men and women who have given up their lives in Iraq, or are living with horrific injuries suffered in that conflict.

If only the war were more entertaining. Less of a downer. Perhaps then we could meet the people who are suffering and dying in it.

For all the talk of supporting the troops, they are a low priority for most Americans. If the nation really cared, the president would not be frolicking at his ranch for the entire month of August. He'd be back in Washington burning the midnight oil, trying to figure out how to get the troops out of the terrible fix he put them in.

Instead, Mr. Bush is bicycling as soldiers and marines are dying. Dozens have been killed since he went off on his vacation.

As for the rest of the nation, it's not doing much for the troops, either. There was a time, long ago, when war required sacrifices that were shared by most of the population. That's over.

I was in Jacksonville, Fla., a few days ago and watched in amusement as a young woman emerged from a restaurant into 95-degree heat and gleefully exclaimed, "All right, let's go shopping!" The war was the furthest thing from her mind.

For the most part, the only people sacrificing for this war are the troops and their families, and very few of them are coming from the privileged economic classes. That's why it's so easy to keep the troops out of sight and out of mind. And it's why, in the third year of a war started by the richest nation on earth, we still get stories like the one in Sunday's Times that began:

"For the second time since the Iraq war began, the Pentagon is struggling to replace body armor that is failing to protect American troops from the most lethal attacks by insurgents."

Scandalous incompetence? Appalling indifference? Try both. Who cares? This is a war fought mostly by other people's children. The loudest of the hawks are the least likely to send their sons or daughters off to Iraq.

The president has never been clear about why we're in Iraq. There's no plan, no strategy. In one of the many tragic echoes of Vietnam, U.S. troops have been fighting hellacious battles to seize areas controlled by insurgents, only to retreat and allow the insurgents to return.

If Mr. Bush were willing to do something he has refused to do so far - speak plainly and honestly to the American people about this war - he might be able to explain why U.S. troops should continue with an effort that is, in large part at least, benefiting Iraqi factions that are murderous, corrupt and terminally hostile to women. If by some chance he could make that case, the next appropriate step would be to ask all Americans to do their part for the war effort.

College kids in the U.S. are playing video games and looking forward to frat parties while their less fortunate peers are rattling around like moving targets in Baghdad and Mosul, trying to dodge improvised explosive devices and rocket-propelled grenades.

There is something very, very wrong with this picture.

If the war in Iraq is worth fighting - if it's a noble venture, as the hawks insist it is - then it's worth fighting with the children of the privileged classes. They should be added to the combat mix. If it's not worth their blood, then we should bring the other troops home.

If Mr. Bush's war in Iraq is worth dying for, then the children of the privileged should be doing some of the dying.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 591 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 05:27 pm
I sure hope this author of this article felt the same way about Vietnam. I'm sure he was busy going to school, smoking dope and protesting the war. If this was his Vietnam experience then I would call him a hypocrite.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 05:30 pm
Baldino
Baldimo wrote:
I sure hope this author of this article felt the same way about Vietnam. I'm sure he was busy going to school, smoking dope and protesting the war. If this was his Vietnam experience then I would call him a hypocrite.


Your responses are so boringly predictable.

BBB
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 05:33 pm
Re: Baldino
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Baldimo wrote:
I sure hope this author of this article felt the same way about Vietnam. I'm sure he was busy going to school, smoking dope and protesting the war. If this was his Vietnam experience then I would call him a hypocrite.


Your responses are so boringly predictable.

BBB


Well the feeling is same when it comes to your posts, boringly predictable! Drunk
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:32 pm
Re: Baldino
Baldimo wrote:
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Baldimo wrote:
I sure hope this author of this article felt the same way about Vietnam. I'm sure he was busy going to school, smoking dope and protesting the war. If this was his Vietnam experience then I would call him a hypocrite.


Your responses are so boringly predictable.

BBB


Well the feeling is same when it comes to your posts, boringly predictable! Drunk


Yo B...keep tipping that Johhny Walker back like that and soon everything will be unpredictable and exciting...even after the 13th go 'round.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 09:41 pm
Re: Baldino
candidone1 wrote:
Baldimo wrote:
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Baldimo wrote:
I sure hope this author of this article felt the same way about Vietnam. I'm sure he was busy going to school, smoking dope and protesting the war. If this was his Vietnam experience then I would call him a hypocrite.


Your responses are so boringly predictable.

BBB


Well the feeling is same when it comes to your posts, boringly predictable! Drunk


Yo B...keep tipping that Johhny Walker back like that and soon everything will be unpredictable and exciting...even after the 13th go 'round.


I don't really drink, it clouds the judgement.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2005 10:08 pm
Baldimo what exactly about the article upset you? Seriously. I mean the author is asking some valid questions.

Just a point of my own. Vietnam was a conscript war was it not? That being so then that could be a salient difference between Iraq and Vietnam.

Iraq is a war being fought by volunteers. So everyone else can sit back safe in the knowledge that they, their sons and daughters will not be required to sign up and go to Iraq. No problemo. Relax. Go shopping. Someone else is doing the fighting. Hmm I wonder if I should try that new French restaurant that opened up across town? Oh I need to get a yellow ribbon for the car. Damn fine job our boys and girls are doing over there in Iraq.

Vietnam was a war fought by volunteers and conscripts. Because people were drafted against their will to fight it became everyone's war (let's not go on about draft dodgers because it will descend into the usual slanging match). Vietnam occupied the mentality of everyone because it affected everyone.

The only people really being affected by Iraq are those that have to go there and their families. People not involved can tut-tut and shake their head and frown but they aren't touched by it in reality. It is a distant war.

Cindy Sheehan was touchd by the war. For her it isn't distant, it's very pesonal. And now she is being attacked because she is reminding people that the distant war can get very close. Cindy Sheehan as a symbol cuts through the "let's go shopping!" mentality. Sheshows Bush up as playing on his ranch - the Commander in Chief is holidaying - while his faithful servants are dying and being mutililated in a war he chose. Hence the need to smear her.

Now, what was it about that article that specifically upset you?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Blood Runs Red, Not Blue
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/03/2024 at 11:21:35