UMass-Amherst 2007 (History Sciences)

A general, is a drill instructor, as a sergeant, a potential NCO that went into the enlisted brigade because of an inspirational book - as opposed to a military academy, a children's toy, a staff colonel or captain in the Navy, being homosexual, a spindle in the urethra, no meditation (or bisexual, first experience with a man, a plebe, a spy's commandant, but with medtiation). A general, is an NCO, that got high marks, and mastered mathematics, extended judgement of task, not psychology, the command to someone else for a repeated science, intended for the staff officer's adjutant, the attache (a military intelligence officer, the NCO).

A politician, is a spy, someone that didn't play a sport above junior varsity, but had a highschool job and managed their own banking "finance" (the details of personal management), and did well at academics, in both their prime ideology (not taken, a college course, proven at job), and a secondary, a political mastery in case of police brutality (their favorite course out of five set, the quad standard four, plus a foreign language, state department, never to be spoken outside of highschool, a computer topography degree at college). A spy, with a scandal, is a politician, but only if the scandal is burned, and publicized, prior to election, through a film, give out "nationally", the entire country, through the four clergies (rabbinicals, women's influence, priests, business influence, ministers, military influence, and clerics, funeral influence, Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism, Islam).

What if I told Vladimir Putin, to send his generals forward, instead of his politicians?

How cagey are you, Putin, to win a war with a schwerpunkt with above, while dodging your own military staff as your job, to keep them appraised of international situations from foreign cyberware intelligence printing you as a biography character?