Sun 26 Sep, 2021 10:45 am
This is a bit of an old chestnut, going back in time to assassinate Hitler and prevent WW2.
It's never that simple though, something always goes wrong, there's a story where killing Hitler results in the Nazis winning the war.
By 1944 the allies had given up on killing Hitler because he kept screwing up.
Here's the situation, going back in time to kill Hitler just makes things worse, as does every other tweak, like making him a successful artist, or something like that.
Only one intervention makes things better. During WW1 in the trenches Hitler was shot in the testicles.
So here's the question, would you go back in time and take a shot to the bollocks for Hitler and stop WW2?
Don't worry if you're a lady, bollocks will be provided.
Maybe go back and take out his parents instead?
All other options make it worse, the only one that works is taking a shot in the nads.
Would a lady type person be required to keep the borrowed doo-dads after the shot?
Usual procedure would apply.
How about killing Hitler's father before he has a chance to screw with the kid's mind?
There is only one option.
Look at it this way, being prepared to go back in time and kill Hitler's parents isn't the same as being prepared to get shot in the balls.
actually if you shot hitler in the bollocks , i mean um what does tom waits say about it in relation to the civil war on that old chestnut.
Hitler was shot in the bollocks and that never happened.
Hitler's been shot in the bollocks 289 times , parantheses 5 of the arbitual contract in the caliseus covenant suggests that on just one of these occasions , this might have happened.
I've noticed you, satisfied?