I don't understand why "kangaroos" is used. Should it be "kangaroo"?
glitterbag wrote:
Good for you Builder, never let the truth get in the way of a juicy slanderous conspiracy theory. Is it true you wear an ankle bracelet that beeps to warn the kangaroos you are in the area????
Source: monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events
The grammar is not very clear to me. If "you" were a group of people (suppose it has 3 people: Mike, Billy and Beck), that Mike wears an ankle bracelet doesn't necessarily mean that Billy or Beck wears one as well (it could be neither of them wears one).
The 'you' used in your example was singular. It makes sense to me that the ankle bracelet would be singular. Yes, he could be wearing two of them but it is neither clear nor likely that he would.
0 Replies
cherrie
2
Reply
Tue 1 Dec, 2020 01:58 am
@oristarA,
Glitterbag's comment was to Builder - one person, not a group of people. Therefore there would only be one ankle bracelet.
no, it's that builder is (jokingly) a danger to the kangaroo population at large...
0 Replies
Borat Sister
1
Reply
Tue 1 Dec, 2020 04:31 pm
@oristarA,
No. The fantasy bracelet is imagined to warn any and all kangaroos in the area that the wearer is near them. In the fantasy the wearer is a danger to kangaroos.
No. The fantasy bracelet is imagined to warn any and all kangaroos in the area that the wearer is near them. In the fantasy the wearer is a danger to kangaroos.
It’s a fantasy insult.
A key question left is:
To whom do "kangaroos" imply?