1
   

Another liberal column. Right?

 
 
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 08:55 am
Another liberal column. Right?
By George McClure
Fort Collins
DenverPost.com

The mainstream media in this country are dominated by liberals.

I was informed of this fact by Rush Limbaugh. And Thomas Sowell. And Ann Coulter. And Rich Lowry. And Bill O'Reilly. And William Safire. And Robert Novak. And William F. Buckley, Jr. And George Will.

And John Gibson. And Michelle Malkin. And David Brooks. And Tony Snow. And Tony Blankely. And Fred Barnes. And Britt Hume. And Larry Kudlow. And Sean Hannity. And David Horowitz. And William Kristol. And Hugh Hewitt.

And Oliver North. And Joe Scarborough. And Pat Buchanan. And John McLaughlin. And Cal Thomas. And Joe Klein. And James Kilpatrick. And Tucker Carlson. And Deroy Murdock. And Michael Savage. And Charles Krauthammer. And Stephen Moore. And Alan Keyes.

And Gary Bauer. And Mort Kondracke. And Andrew Sullivan. And Nicholas von Hoffman. And Neil Cavuto. And Matt Drudge. And Mike Rosen. And Dave Kopel. And John Caldara.

The mainstream media in this country are dominated by liberals. For instance, did you know there is an ultra-leftist professor at the University of Colorado named Ward Churchill who wrote an essay three years ago in which he called victims of Sept. 11 "little Eichmanns"? Bet you never heard of him, as the liberal media elite likes to put the kibosh on embarrassing stories like this.

The mainstream media in this country are dominated by liberals. Look at how they all gave Bill Clinton a pass on the whole Monica Lewsinsky affair. Remember? It was never in the news. We never heard any of the salacious details. The work of his presidency never came to a virtual halt while he defended himself.

The mainstream media in this country are dominated by liberals. They have so poisoned the electorate that no Republicans can get elected. Republicans don't control the presidency. Republicans don't control both houses of Congress. Republicans don't control 28 of 50 governorships.

Last year, a lot was made of a report released by The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. The report found that 34 percent of national journalists identified themselves as liberal, 54 percent identified themselves as moderate and 7 percent identified themselves as conservative. Twenty-three percent of local journalists identified themselves as liberal, 61 percent identified themselves as moderate and 12 percent identified themselves as conservative.

These figures can be interpreted in a number of ways. First of all, if you actually read the whole report, you'd come across commentary that specifically warned against drawing any easy, across-the-board conclusions: "We would be reluctant to infer too much here. The survey includes just four questions probing journalists' political attitudes, yet the answers to these questions suggest journalists have in mind something other than a classic big government liberalism and something more along the lines of libertarianism."

But pretend you're doing a story on the Pew report, and the nuanced comments above are not sufficiently dramatic for your medium. You need to reduce things into some digestible sound bites. If you wanted to sound the alarm bells on the right, you could say that national journalists were nearly five times as likely to identify themselves as liberal than as conservative. This would be literally true but perhaps a little misleading, as the same poll results tell us that 61 percent of national journalists identified themselves as moderate or conservative.

If you're John Gibson of Fox News, you just make up your own statistics and claim that "80-some percent of reporters are self-described liberals." If you're Rush Limbaugh, you offer up the same lie a day later and specifically cite the poll that proves you wrong: "most of them (journalists) are liberals. Eighty percent of them will admit it in the latest press poll ... ."

Just for the sake of argument, let's assume that the media in America really are predominantly recalcitrant leftists. Say you're a conservative media mogul named Rupert and you have the wherewithal to do something about it. Here are three paths you might take:

1. You could announce your belief that the reporting of news is always subjective and therefore biased, so you are going to start a news network that comes at things from your own perspective in order to balance out what you perceive to be the bias of the left.

2. You could set up your own news network that actually is fair and balanced.

3. You could set up your own news network that's consistently and demonstrably partisan, but call yourself fair and balanced.

Guess which one he chose.

This just in at Fox News ... the mainstream media in this country are dominated by liberals.

George McClure is a former stand-up comic who now works as general manager of a Denver marketing firm.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,597 • Replies: 36
No top replies

 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 09:16 am
No one suggests the right isn't represented by the best the media has to offer, just that the left whines louder and longer and therefore gets more attention leading to the belief the media is dominated by liberals.

Squeaky wheel and all that...
0 Replies
 
thethinkfactory
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 05:40 pm
Liberal Whiner and Bleeding Heart Liberal are the same types of tags that attempt to paint all the enemies of whomevers adgenda wished to be forwarded. The titles, conservative and liberal are meaningless unless defines.

The definition of Liberal - by Mill - is one who thinks that more education allows people to make more informed choices and thus makes them more happy.

I am stunned, given this definition, that liberal is a title that media workers consider themselves to fall under.

TTF
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 05:43 pm
That's hardly an acceptable definition of "liberal"
0 Replies
 
thethinkfactory
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 05:55 pm
Sorry it was John Stuart Mill's - not mine.

Complain to him. Wink

Care to forward the ball and attempt to define these empty and worthless tags bandied about only when they are bad words used to attack your enemy.

TTF
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 05:59 pm
McGentrix wrote:
That's hardly an acceptable definition of "liberal"

You are, of course, going to provide us ignorant bastards with the correct definiton of liberal, aren't you mcg. We would all love to hear it I'm sure.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:01 pm
McGentrix wrote:
That's hardly an acceptable definition of "liberal"
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:15 pm
Really? Is that what wikipedia says? Hmmmm...maybe we should change that.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:18 pm
Go for it.

Maybe look up Mills first.

~~~~~~~

Now if McG gets to define liberals, that means someone else gets to define conservative. I think I like that idea.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:19 pm
Changing the definitions of words to suit his own preconceived notions. Yep, a tyrant.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:20 pm
count me in, I'll even attempt to be fair and balanced. (well, as much as a liberal can be fair and balanced)
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:22 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
Changing the definitions of words to suit his own preconceived notions. Yep, a tyrant.


Correcting definitions is hardly tyrannical. Educational would be a far better term for the service I provide.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:23 pm
When did dys become a liberal?

Confused
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:24 pm
Well, the definition of changing is not correcting, though a correction could include a change and a change could include a correction.

Ah well, let's have it then. What's your definition.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:24 pm
you go for it mcg, we are all anxiously awaiting the mcg definition.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:26 pm
He's already changed the definition at Wikipedia.



Always good to know someone will live down to your expectations of them.


just popping this in for a reference

Quote:
Revision as of 22 June 2005 23:08
Joy Stovall (Talk | contribs)
rmv vandalism
← Older edit Current revision
69.201.41.143 (Talk | contribs)
Deleted unneccessary verbiage.
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[politics]], the term ''liberal'' refers to: In [[politics]], the term ''liberal'' refers to:
- * an adherent of the ideology of ''[[liberalism]]'' —an ideology espousing [[liberty]]. The inverse of liberty is [[tyranny]]. + * an adherent of the ideology of ''[[liberalism]]'' —an ideology espousing [[liberty]].
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 09:22 am
BBB
McG, tread carefully or you will cross the line of plagiarizing George Orwell.

BBB
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 09:37 am
Excuse me? You both can pucker up.

If you want to use Wikipedia as a reference, you'd better understand what it is.

"Wikipedia is an encyclopedia written collaboratively by many of its readers. Lots of people are constantly improving Wikipedia, making thousands of changes an hour, all of which are recorded on the page history and the Recent Changes page."
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 09:38 am
Where's that definition? Tap, tap, tap.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 09:41 am
FreeDuck wrote:
Where's that definition? Tap, tap, tap.


I did not say I was going to provide one.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Another liberal column. Right?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/26/2024 at 04:31:39