I dont think Ive said anything of the kind re "Phosphorylation"
And, wat I said was that cbiology was really applied Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. (Two very similar but divergent diciplines that see reactions for several poles of research)
What you DONT believe , I find , is most grown out of misunderstanding or a fairly shallow understanding of what these disciplines actually represent.
Ive often said that, I do have severl really sharp Applied IT guys who have taken our equations and turned them into programs used in such things as "RockLogger et al". Each of the several guys and ladies who worked out our codes were FIRST scientists in the fields , then they became coders or programmers or whatever they call themselves. THEY UNDERSTAND THE SCIENCES THEY WORK WITHIN. They arent primarily programmers who, like the carpenter, see everything as a nail..
In case youre not familiar with Dr Austen. hes made a lifes work "futzing for Jesus" writing about Pleiochroic "halos" in igneous rock micas, where polonium laves a rad halo, and because the halo is a function of a radioactive element with a very short half life, (Polonium), and a decay product (the "halo"), the rock cannot possibly be indicative of a very old igneous rock.
What Austen forgets is that all the Polonium (the specific isotopes) are daughter products o URANIUM then RADON. Uranium has a half life that caan asily leave Po "halos" because its own half life is sufficiently long to generate isotop daughters hundreds of millions of yers old.
I xpect someone like gunga to be wowed by that kind of thinking but I wonder why the Dicovery Institute tries to foist that kind of frudulent thinking on a world of interested people.
ILL TELL YOU WHY
I think the Discovery Institute is hoping tht most all of their"Students" are really stupid and will believe anything as long as it sounds sciientific enough
SO, as weve said many times , if not to you but to Ll, Jacob,(others I forget) tht I am under NO obligations here to make you believe anything I say. So just dont bother me with your beliefs and call them science or make your beliefs sound scientific is you dont want me to take shots at them.
I G.A.S. whether you believe me or not, All I can say is tht, so far, the science works perfectly for the world of science, and that Drs Demski, Behe, Austen etc have all been argued to the floor quite easily .
Dr Behe , in his famous testimony at th Dover Pa case, sounded like a total fool and gave the judge enough ammo for Judge Jones to use the phrase "breathtaking Inanity" when describing the science presented in defense of ID in science class.
Teach, Preach, and live with ID as a basis of your beliefs , just pleeeeeeze dont try to make believe that its real science cause it isnt.
Stay well, stay outta crowds, stay 6' from coughing people and buy stocks on a dollar coast average cause the ride aint over.