Einsteins special relativity nonsense

Nassim Haramein - Unified the fields, in 2012 - He also was abducted by mantis-like creatures when he was 9 yrs-old, has met with the 100 member, Galactic federation and is the leading human physicist (Independant) of current times.

All of the above is actual.

He's a mate of mine.
Have a lovely Day

Also, in Fall 2018, He, Rob S, Matt Belair, Hancock, Tellinger, et al had an 'exclusive' in ALL 3 Giza Plat, pyramids - 64 crystals placed underhead in KC Sarcophagus (Primary Chrystal on nose-bridge) - Each participated.

Russians claimed 'unexplained pulse...?' Called Egyptian 'authorities' - Asked 'Who the FK, is in the 'Gate' (Pyramids).

Go figure.

Have a lovely Day

Mark you silly man, you are posting amateur comedy in a science forum.
If you have something sensible to say they say it, otherwise go to the comedy forum.

I too have problems with all this as the counter intuitive nature of this theory of light makes it all the more important to test every aspect. In particular, whatever MM proved about the speed of light emission, it told us nothing about the speed at reception. Until this is done, why should I not believe that ‘photons’ arrive here at different speeds according to the relative motion of their sources. Among other things this would generate a Doppler effect at both ends.

Excuse me.

I am posting factual 'actual' accepted by science, gold standard truths & events that have altered the 'dead-end' physics that 'foundation-sponsored' bollux has manufactured, in order to keep this species in the dark-ages.

Like Einstein said 'It is 'insanity' to expect different results, while conducting the same experiments - Again & Again.'

In 2012, Nassim Haramein - Unified the fields.

From here on - Do your own homework.

Have a lovely Day

No one should be suggesting that mythical photons can be relative to their source, just as sound and water waves are not relative to their source, but spread from the point of generation relative to the medium.
Although Einsteins want it both ways, he agrees that light is not relative to the motion of the source, but immediately restricts that to mean ONLY in the direction that the photon is moving. In all other directions (because light spreads out as a sphere if permitted) Einstein thinks that light IS affected by the motion of the source!
As shown in the classical light clock on a moving carriage imaginary thought experiment, where light is both NOT affected but the speed of the carriage, (must always go at c) but it IS affected by the motion of the carriage, in that the photon now has taken up a proportion of the carriage (sources) motion, this giving the claimed zig zag effect, like a ball would do, but a ball IS also affected by the velocity of the carriage)

So Einstein has a foot in each camp despite that fact that both camps are mutually exclusive.

Einstein's theory is nonsense.
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, A, vol.24(1)

Although scientists had long since discussed the possibility of speed in excess of the speed of light, Warp Speed did not enter into the public consciousness until the expression was popularized on the science-fiction show Star Trek, in the 1960s.
The Star Ship Enterprise, was supposed to have been able to travel at nine thousand times the speed of Light, while the Millennium Falcon could travel at nine million times the speed of Light.

Einstein’s Theory of Relativity says that the speed of light is the maximum speed that anything can travel in the Universe, and yet it is believed that Galaxies beyond the cosmic horizon are moving away from us faster than light, therefore, the light that they emit can never reach us, so, we cannot see them.

If this is correct, it would appear to break Einstein’s theories, but it doesn’t, because it’s the space itself which is expanding, and the galaxies are being carried along with it. The Galaxies themselves are not moving through space at the speed of Light, therefore no laws are broken.

https://www.google.com/search?q=%E2%80%98Time+dilation+beyond+cosmic+horizon&oq=%E2%80%98Time+dilation+beyond+cosmic+horizon&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIKCAEQABiABBiiBDIKCAIQABiABBiiBDIKCAMQABiABBiiBDIKCAQQABiABBiiBNIBCDQ2OTlqMGoxqAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

As revealed in the link supplied in previous post, Chelsea Gohd from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory said that matter near a black hole can be spaghettified, super-heated, squeezed, pancaked, pulled apart, and swirled around all while time itself stretches in unusual ways. But once that matter falls all the way past the event horizon into the black hole, we don't yet know exactly what happens. This is one part of the story that remains a mystery.

Although scientists believe that a singularity is a region of space-time in which matter is crushed so closely together that the gravitational laws explained by general relativity break down. In a singularity, the volume of space is zero and its density is infinite. Scientists believe such a singularity exists at the core of a black hole, which occurs when a super-massive sun reaches the end of its life and implodes.

General relativity also demands such a singularity must exist at the beginning of an expanding universe. If this is the case, then our entire universe existed as a singularity in a black Hole before the Big Bang.

Einstein's theory is nonsense. Absolutely everything he wrote is nonsense. Currently, this “theory” has been elevated to classical physics - a continuation of nonsense.

I don't know. The light from every star in the sky propagates at the same speed?

Einstein had to study the theory of waves before inventing his theory. The speed of the wave, as such, does not depend on the speed of the wave source. A model could be driving a twig through water. Here is the wave speed, and the red shift, and the blue shift.

The principle applies to anything moving at the speed of light, whether it's a wave or not.

In my thoughts I am guided by the concepts of Newtonian physics, not Einsteinian. Einstein ruined the very concept of relativity. Dark matter is matter that moves in space relative to us at superluminal speeds. Accordingly, we move relative to this matter at superluminal speed.
Speed ​​is a relative concept.

Dark matter does not move through space faster than light relative to us. No object with mass can. There has been universal agreement on this point for over a century and all tests have confirmed it. How you think isn't relevant.

Inside the system, it is impossible to overcome the speed of light. But in nature there are portable speeds, there is the addition of speeds, the very concept of speed is relative.

Task. Engineers have created a device capable of moving in space for a long time with constant acceleration"g". How long will it take to reach the speed of light? Answer: 300 days.
Where is the problem?
Einstein banned it?

You sound delusional.

Einstein didn't have the power to ban anything, he wasn't a politician.

As a rule of thumb Newtonian physics works very well with big slow moving objects, but the minute we get to the molecular level or the speed of light it goes out the window.

There is pretty much a scientific concensus on this.

If you can't understand it fair enough, but don't have a hissy fit because it's beyond you.

You have no idea how fast you were going, but at least you know where you are.

There was a time when the Earth was flat. There was also agreement on this matter.
I set a simple task.
The scientific community has elevated the theory of relativity to the rank of classical physics. So what, now pray for this nonsense?