17
   

The meaning of getting to Mars? Your view?

 
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 05:42 am
Regarding maintaining atmospheres:
eurocelticyankee
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 05:43 am
@Olivier5,
My No 1 reason would be an insurance policy for our species.

Let's face it we are just 1 event from the stone age so why not have a colony elsewhere just in case.

farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 05:48 am
@eurocelticyankee,
well put. Raups" law" sorta says that species survive extinction almost as a direct proportion to their genetic and environmental variability.

Thats why ants will rule till the end.

ALL HAIL FORMICADAE
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 06:07 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
Ray Bradbury...
He thought of space satellites before we had em and much more work was needed to even send up the first few.

Wasn't that Arthur C. Clarke?
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 06:09 am
@farmerman,
Agreed Farma. Speaking of sci-fi remember the good old days? These guys "invented"/concept the first-gen of smartphones...also I loved the audio effects of Space 1999!
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 06:30 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
My cousin used to be a Dick Tracy fan, so Im gonna guess that CHESTER GOULD "Invented" the concept of a cell phone he changed his 2-way wrist radio into a telephone system.
0 Replies
 
livinglava
 
  0  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 06:42 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

Quote:
it doesn't really work to just cultivate a biological-fit species and then introduce it into an unfamiliar environment. There has to be cultural continuity between generations and across environmental changes.


Humans have been known to colonize and adapt to totally new environments in as few as two generations. Whenever weve colonized totally "human-free" zones weve flourished in quick times. Seems to counter your hypothesis.

Example(s)? Humans have never biologically engineered their bodies to colonize a 'human-free zone' on Earth, and even if they had, they have never been in a situation devoid of continuity/connection with other terrestrial ecosystems. Everything alive on Earth has migrated from somewhere else on Earth. Life moves and evolves gradually before it settles. It doesn't pop up in place already adapted to its present environment. You're starting to sound like you believe in spontaneous generation of life.

Quote:
Seems like humans dont merely adapt we take-over, we are the king of opportunists. Entirely new lands have provided us entirely new resources initially in unlimited amounts. Thats part of our problem.

True, our strength as a species does tend to tempt us into arrogance and thus short-sightedness where the less-immediate consequences of our actions are concerned. But then you would not be surprised by that if you believed in the Biblical parables of bad choices leading to bad results in order to teach humans foresight in making better choices following their/our mistakes.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 06:49 am
@livinglava,
NO, as I said we are the top opportunist spcies and we have a hell of a tool kit. Spontaneous generation was proved wrong the 700's (although many people hung on to it for a few more centuries).
We can control our environments fairly well and we are at the dawn of self directed evolution. Read up about CRSPR.
0 Replies
 
livinglava
 
  0  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 06:59 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

You shouldn't shoot your mouth off when you don't know what you're talking about. Gravity is not some big magnet. It is an expression (and an imprecise term, too) of the attractive nature of mass. It doesn't take that much mass to pin an atmosphere to a planet--or a moon such as Saturn's moon Titan, from which I have suggested we could get nitrogen.

Gases expand as they warm, and so cold planets can have denser atmospheres than warmer ones.

If you started trying to pressurize Mars' atmosphere by adding gas, the gas would begin piling up as long as it was cold, but the moment the greenhouse effect caused it to warm up, it would expand very quickly and get blown away by solar wind.

Even Earth would lose its atmosphere to solar wind if it weren't for the magnetic field caused by our molten core. As the upper atmosphere would be shaved away, the lower atmosphere would rise higher and thus decompress, lowering the boiling point of water, which would cause liquid water to vaporize, and the greenhouse effect from the vapor would result in a vicious cycle of vaporization and atmosphere loss until we were left with a relatively thin, cold atmosphere.

Earth's atmosphere in the absence of its magnetic field (molten core) would probably not be as thin as Mars' due to Mars having 1/3 Earth's gravity, but the magnetic field supposedly prevents atmosphere loss that would otherwise occur due to direct bombardment by solar wind.

Quote:
This is from NASA's Solar System Exploration page about Titan:

As exotic as Titan might sound, in some ways it’s one of the most hospitable worlds in the solar system. Titan’s nitrogen atmosphere is so dense that a human wouldn’t need a pressure suit to walk around on the surface. He or she would, however, need an oxygen mask and protection against the cold—temperatures at Titan’s surface are around minus 290 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 179 Celsius).

At cold temperatures, denser atmosphere means faster heat-loss. Denser and more humid air feel colder because they don't insulate as well as dry air that is less dense. Vacuum is ultimately the best insulator, which is why vacuum thermoses are so efficient.

Quote:
Titan’s dense atmosphere, as well as gravity roughly equivalent to Earth’s Moon, mean that a raindrop falling through Titan’s sky would fall more slowly than on Earth.

And that it would be frozen solid, not that water is ever likely to evaporate at -180C.

Quote:
While Earth rain falls at about 20 miles per hour (9.2 meters per second), scientists have calculated that rain on Titan falls at about 3.5 miles per hour (1.6 meters per second), or about six times more slowly than Earth’s rain. Titan’s raindrops can also be pretty large. The maximum diameter of Earth raindrops is about 0.25 inches (6.5 millimeters) while raindrops on Titan can reach diameters of 0.37 inches (9.5 millimeters), or about 50 percent larger than an Earth raindrop.

The rain is methane, not water.

Quote:
Titan has 0.0225 the mass of the Earth. Mars, by contrast, has about 11% the mass of Earth. Using the atmospheric pressure of Earth at mean sea level as a base line, that means that the atmospheric pressure on mean surface level on Titan is 1.45 atmospheres--much denser and heavier than our atmosphere.

You should take to heart the dictum that it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

Not at all. If you don't post something for discussion, there's nothing to discuss. Better to post a wrong answer in order to stimulate discussion of why it's wrong and what the right answer is and why, then to keep silent and allow lots of people with similar gaps in their knowledge/reasoning to go on assuming things that are obstructing their progress toward truer perspective.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 07:38 am
@eurocelticyankee,
Because the cost would be absolutely humongous, and the benefit small.
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 08:25 am
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 08:28 am
I've been reading a bit about a space station to orbit the moon. Which is most likely, a moon base or space station?
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Feb, 2020 07:35 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Good video, but he makes a mistake at the very beginning. Venus also has a stable atmosphere, and the largest, densest atmosphere in our star system. Venus can't get no respect!
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Feb, 2020 03:51 am
@Setanta,
I think the next Mars ROVER will have a MOXIE unit strapped to it. eve known for years how to stract O2 from CO2. I think MOXIE uses a Li2 CO3 pressure extraction process.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Wed 19 Feb, 2020 09:39 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
Why is this seen as necessary, let alone desirable?

Because we don't want to go extinct.

If you were inside a burning building, would you question the desirability of leaving the building before the fire cut your life short?


hightor wrote:
Why should a tribe of squabbling apes merit such a glorious outcome? It reeks of speciesism.

What does merit have to do with it? Most of us prefer to avoid extinction.


hightor wrote:
No, because we'll succeed in making our home unlivable before we have the means to escape.

Hopefully not.


hightor wrote:
Moving billions of people through space to terraform and colonize some distant rock orbiting another star seems extremely far-fetched.

It's no more far fetched than European nations setting up small colonies on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean hundreds of years ago.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Feb, 2020 09:40 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
My whole thing is that we must become intergalactic within a few million years or go totally xtinct along with all life.

Do you mean interstellar?

If you mean intergalactic, what would we find in other galaxies that we would not find in our own galaxy?

And how would we manage to travel between galaxies? The distances would make interstellar travel look trivial.

If you really meant interstellar though, then we are in agreement.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Wed 19 Feb, 2020 09:42 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
None of your questions provides a rationale for the colonization of other planets and all of them can be answered without recourse to any explanation other than hunger, bragging rights, narcissism, and greed.

Rationale: We desire to avoid extinction for as long as possible.

The time will come when we will not be able to avoid extinction. But by hopping from star to star every 50 billion years or so (depending on the lifespan of the stars we choose), our species should be able to prolong our existence for as long as there are stars in the universe.

After there are no more stars giving off light in the universe, we should still be able to survive for quite some time by converting mass to energy and generating our own power.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Wed 19 Feb, 2020 09:45 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Again, Ive never talked about colonization of Mars as an earth substitute because when the sun starts burning helium, it will probably take out Mars too in the "glow".

Putting a lot of heat/light blocking materials in orbit could keep the temperature down and allow the climate to stay habitable as the sun starts putting out more and more energy.
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Wed 19 Feb, 2020 09:50 pm
@livinglava,
livinglava wrote:
Why aren't you taking the low gravity into consideration?

In addition to the weak gravity, the lack of a strong magnetic field to ward off the solar wind can't be good for the Martian atmosphere.

I don't know enough about terraforming to know how much of an obstacle this is.

We might be able to live in domes on Mars though even if we can't live in the open.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Wed 19 Feb, 2020 10:18 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
we, as a species, must sooner or later face the reality of an EXTRA CRISPY future for all 4 inner planets followed by a 100 million year brown out for the entire solar system

We might be able to alter Earth's orbit a bit by directing asteroids to go whizzing by us, thereby preventing Earth from being engulfed by the sun when it becomes a red giant.

And like I mentioned a couple posts up, heat/light blocking materials in orbit could keep temperatures down as the sun gets hotter.

Once things cool off though, we'll only survive on Earth if we generate our own power.

It's probably for the best if at some point we abandon the solar system for a new star that still has a lot of life left in it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 03:50:19