3
   

SUPREME JUSTICE - Souters House could be next

 
 
woiyo
 
Reply Tue 28 Jun, 2005 11:48 am
In a lovely bit of irony, I offer the following..


http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html

"Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land.

Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.

On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.

Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.

The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged.""


Somehow, I find this almost too good to be true!!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 3 • Views: 973 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
bermbits
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jun, 2005 08:47 am
A misuse of analogy, but maybe next, Bush's daughters should join the military....
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jun, 2005 08:48 am
woiyo, you have a sharp eye for the ironic
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jun, 2005 08:54 am
bermbits wrote
Quote:
A misuse of analogy, but maybe next, Bush's daughters should join the military....

Continuing the analogy. If they followed in their brave dad's footsteps they would then go AWOL
0 Replies
 
ConstitutionalGirl
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jun, 2005 08:58 am
Supreme Court justice
faces boot from home?
Developer wants 'Lost Liberty Hotel' built upon property of David Souter

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45029

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: June 28, 2005
1:45 p.m. Eastern


By Ron Strom
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com



Justice David Souter

A private developer contacted the local government in Supreme Court Justice David Souter's hometown in New Hampshire yesterday asking that the property of the judge - who voted in favor of a controversial decision allowing a city to take residents' homes for private development - be seized to make room for a new hotel.

Logan Darrow Clements faxed a request to Chip Meany, the code enforcement officer of the town of Weare, N.H., seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road, the present location of Souter's home.


Wrote Clements: "Although this property is owned by an individual, David H. Souter, a recent Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. City of New London, clears the way for this land to be taken by the government of Weare through eminent domain and given to my LLC for the purposes of building a hotel. The justification for such an eminent domain action is that our hotel will better serve the public interest as it will bring in economic development and higher tax revenue to Weare."

The Kelo v. City of New London decision, handed down Thursday, allows the New London, Conn., government to seize the homes and businesses of residents to facilitate the building of an office complex that would provide economic benefits to the area and more tax revenue to the city. Though the practice of eminent domain is provided for in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, this case is significant because the seizure is for private development and not for "public use," such as a highway or bridge. The decision has been roundly criticized by property-rights activists and limited-government commentators.

According to a statement from Clements, the proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, "featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America." Instead of a Gideon's Bible in each room, guests will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged," the statement said.

Clements says the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site - "being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans."

Souter has claimed Weare as his home since he moved there as an 11-year-old boy with his family.

"This is not a prank" said Clements. "The town of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."

Clements says his plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise additional capital for the project.

While Clements currently makes a living in marketing and video production, he tells WND he has had involvement in real estate development and is fully committed to the project.

"We will build a hotel there if investors come forward, definitely," he said.



Clements is the CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, which is dedicated to fighting "the most deadly and destructive force on the planet: abusive governments," the website states.

The activist says he is aware of the apparent conflict of someone who is strongly opposed to the Kelo decision using it to purposely oust an American from his property.

"I realize there is a contradiction, but we're only going to use it against people who advocated" the Kelo decision, Clements told WND. "Therefore, it's a case of retaliation, not initiation."

Clements says some people have already offered to put money into the project.


He's getting his own medicine, I assume.
0 Replies
 
ConstitutionalGirl
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jun, 2005 09:43 am
Giving their medicine.
If your disgusted with the supremes rulling, you can get revenge by clicking here. Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jun, 2005 04:05 pm
I really am ill at ease with this Anthony Kennedy right wing ruling.
0 Replies
 
ConstitutionalGirl
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jun, 2005 08:32 pm
Actually though, there are at least two other things that can be done to stop this out of control Supreme Court. One is for congress to impeach the jerks. The other is to urge our Congress to pass a constitutional amendment that is bullet-proof in this area of property rights.

I wonder if it's possible for the President to do something via an Executive Order???
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jun, 2005 08:51 pm
I think we ought to string up Kennedy from the highest goddamn corinthian arch in DC.
0 Replies
 
ConstitutionalGirl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Jun, 2005 05:20 pm
blatham wrote:
I think we ought to string up Kennedy from the highest goddamn corinthian arch in DC.
Do you realize that other Judges share the same responcabiltity?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Jun, 2005 06:24 pm
Well, they can have the paltry and low class Ionic columns... but it is the Corinthian for that traitor to the cause, Kennedy.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » SUPREME JUSTICE - Souters House could be next
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 03:50:03