Brandon9000 wrote:Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
I may disagree with Brandon on this issue, but I acknowledge and commend the consistency of his principles.
Well, ty. I had a girlfriend once who was a medical student, and the idea that doctors heal one and all with no judgement as to who is good or bad, and that they never deliberately do harm, is stressed so strongly and continuously to them, that it is very disturbing to me that some doctors would ignore it. Doctors hold a very special place in our society, almost like priests, and it seems to me that these individuals betrayed it.
And yet they really don't, any more than priests do.
Flawed humans in exalted positions...at least doctors have a demonstrable skill and/or temporally meaningful function.
None-the-less, it is irrational to expect some level of superior moral performance from someone who happens to be skilled at fixing human ills.
Because a military doctor finds himself in Iraq and amidst Jihadist scumbags in no way requires him to elevate his moral course.
All this equine fecal matter is political.
I find no need to "fairly" castigate anyone who dispenses with dubious professional ethics to support the interests of his or her nation.
It boils down to this:
These people are trying to hurt us --- we need to stop then from hurting us --- even if it means killing them.
The rest is horse shi-t.
If you and yours are willing to sacrifice you and your lives to the furtherment of some ideal, God Bless You, but don't ask me and mine to chip in.
We, not you, will decide what is altruistic, what is noble, what is heroic...
( I speak to more than brandon)