1
   

GOP senators look to increase retirement age to SIXTY NINE

 
 
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:08 pm
GOP Senators May Make 69 Retirement Age SOURCE
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 638 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:14 pm
Uh-oh. The 800-lb gorilla is out of it's cage.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:15 pm
I was born in 1942. In the regular reports the SS sends me I am told I can retire at 65 and ten months, but, to get full benefits I have to wait til I'm 70. I don't see the change.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:25 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
I was born in 1942. In the regular reports the SS sends me I am told I can retire at 65 and ten months, but, to get full benefits I have to wait til I'm 70. I don't see the change.


If you were born in 1942 then you can retire with full benefits at age 65 and 10 months. You'd get a higher amount if you delay your retirement up to age 70 (that's supposed to be an incentive.).

http://www.ssa.gov/retirechartred.htm

Right now there is a sliding scale for anyone born between 1937 and 1960. Those born after 1960 can retire will full benefits at age 67.

It looks like this proposal extends the scale farther along so that those born in say.. 2000 may not be able to retire with full benefits at age 70. (I've yet to see anything showing what the extended scale might actually look like though)
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:29 pm
In a coupla decades the average retirement age will be "deceased"
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:30 pm
Born in '44. My 'full retirement' age is 67.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:35 pm
farmerman wrote:
In a coupla decades the average retirement age will be "deceased"


Not quite. lol Average life expectancy for a newborn increased by 6 years between 1970 and 2003. Their full retirement age hasn't gone up at all so far.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:36 pm
At 62 I was eligible to receive benefits, but if I work they take a bunch away. I can retire at 65 and ten months for a bit more, but can earn as much as I want without penalty. Then, at age 70 I can get almost twice the prior amount.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:38 pm
And yet people continue to elect the type of congress that takes everything away.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:41 pm
farmerman wrote:
In a coupla decades the average retirement age will be "deceased"


Laughing that's the whole point of increasing the age.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Jun, 2005 08:52 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
At 62 I was eligible to receive benefits, but if I work they take a bunch away. I can retire at 65 and ten months for a bit more, but can earn as much as I want without penalty. Then, at age 70 I can get almost twice the prior amount.


The way the current system is setup you get 100% of benefits at age 65 and 10 months (because of your year of birth). (I typo'd on my earler post and wrote 62 and 10 months - I'll edit that.)

Anyone can retire at age 62. If you did that you'd take a cut of 24.17% for the 1st 46 months so your checks would only be 75.83% of the full benefit amount until the 46 months was up.

If you delay your retirement past age 65 and 10 months they'll add an additional 7.5% to your monthly check for each added year. If you waited until age 70 and 10 months that would give you 145% of full benefits.
0 Replies
 
flyboy804
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Jun, 2005 06:53 am
Unless I am mistaken, if you take early retirement, your monthly payments are permenantly reduced. They do not jump to the regular rate when you reach the "normal" retirement age. Of course the COLAs are still applied to your payments as applicable. I know that's how it has been for me, who has been collecting since 1990. I remember reading at the time that the amounts were computed so that based on actuarial tables and assuming you died at the appropriate time, you would receive the same total amount (compounding included) at the time of death regardless of which option you took.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » GOP senators look to increase retirement age to SIXTY NINE
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 10/04/2024 at 07:33:50