OK, is that place in Southern California, osso, and is it some sort of public building?
not in southern California
I had to look that up to be sure. It's part of the public domain.
OK, osso. is that public building as far north as Eureka?
No, Letty, not that far north....
Hmmm. That may be some sort of art gallery; Let's try the area of San Francisco, osso. Hey, that is semi alliteration.
Well, you're closer than you were in Eureka...
This place is not so much called an art gallery, though there is, as you can see, art in it.
Was I right about the art gallery? and is the place South of San Francisco or North? Hey, soccer, was that comment on being hit over the head with a rolled up newspaper a hint?
Well, Letty, which would you like?
Oops we cross posted, osso. I'll guess South of San Fran, then. Is the place a public library?
Yes, it is south of San Francisco and North of southern California, the boundary line between southern and northern being different depending on who you ask. Let's say it is north of Santa Barbara, south of San Francisco.
Back in a minute.
OK, I'm unaware if there is a library in the place - I think not.
Upon your return, osso, it's time for a hint.
You could ask more about the structure the pool is in...
My word, osso. I didn't recognize that as being a pool. George fooled me about that before. Hmmmm. Is it a public bath house or spa?
Aha, glad I mentioned it, then!
No, it's not been used as a public pool, that I know of anyway.
Given your new knowledge, I'll let you think and ask some more questions.
Then if you're stymied, I'll find some more telltale photos.
was this once a private residence?
