1
   

911 and the Precautionary Principle:

 
 
Reply Sat 7 May, 2005 03:16 pm
911 and the Precautionary Principle: Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity:

by George Nelson
Colonel, USAF (ret.)

The precautionary principle is based on the fact it is impossible to prove a false claim. Failure to prove a claim does not automatically make it false, but caution is called for, especially in the case of a world-changing event like the alleged terror attacks of September 11, 2001. The Bush administration has provided no public evidence to support its claim that the terror attacks were the work of Muslim extremists or even that the aircraft that struck their respective targets on September 11 were as advertised. As I will show below, it would be a simple matter to confirm that they were - if they were. Until such proof is forthcoming, the opposite claim must be kept in mind as a precaution against rushing to judgment: the 911 hijackings were part of a black operation carried out with the cooperation of elements in our government.

In July 1965 I had just been commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in the U. S. Air Force after taking a solemn oath that I would protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and that I would bear true faith and allegiance to the same. I took that oath very seriously. It was my constant companion throughout a thirty-year military career in the field of aircraft maintenance.

http://www.physics911.net/767tanker.jpg

As an additional duty, aircraft maintenance officers are occasionally tasked as members of aircraft accident investigation boards and my personal experience was no exception. In 1989 I graduated from the Aircraft Mishap Investigation Course at the Institute of Safety and Systems Management at the University of Southern California. In addition to my direct participation as an aircraft accident investigator, I reviewed countless aircraft accident investigation reports for thoroughness and comprehensive conclusions for the Inspector General, HQ Pacific Air Forces during the height of the Vietnam conflict.

In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.

Following a certain number of flying hours or, in the case of landing gears, a certain number of takeoff-and-landing cycles, these critical parts are required to be changed, overhauled or inspected by specialist mechanics. When these parts are installed, their serial numbers are married to the aircraft registration numbers in the aircraft records and the plans and scheduling section will notify maintenance specialists when the parts must be replaced. If the parts are not replaced within specified time or cycle limits, the airplane will normally be grounded until the maintenance action is completed. Most of these time-change parts, whether hydraulic flight surface actuators , pumps, landing gears, engines or engine components, are virtually indestructible. It would be impossible for an ordinary fire resulting from an airplane crash to destroy or obliterate all of those critical time-change parts or their serial numbers. I repeat, impossible.

Considering the catastrophic incidents of September 11 2001, certain troubling but irrefutable conclusions must be drawn from the known facts. I get no personal pleasure or satisfaction from reporting my own assessment of these facts.

United Airlines Flight 93

This flight was reported by the federal government to be a Boeing 757 aircraft, registration number N591UA, carrying 45 persons, including four Arab hijackers who had taken control of the aircraft, crashing the plane in a Pennsylvania farm field.

Aerial photos of the alleged crash site were made available to the general public. They show a significant hole in the ground, but private investigators were not allowed to come anywhere near the crash site. If an aircraft crash caused the hole in the ground, there would have literally hundreds of serially-controlled time-change parts within the hole that would have proved beyond any shadow of doubt the precise tail-number or identity of the aircraft. However, the government has not produced any hard evidence that would prove beyond a doubt that the specifically alleged aircraft crashed at that site. On the contrary, it has been reported that the aircraft, registry number N591UA, is still in operation.

American Airlines Flight 11

This flight was reported by the government to be a Boeing 767, registration number N334AA, carrying 92 people, including five Arabs who had hijacked the plane. This plane was reported to have crashed into the north tower of the WTC complex of buildings.

Again, the government would have no trouble proving its case if only a few of the hundreds of serially controlled parts had been collected to positively identify the aircraft. A Boeing 767 landing gear or just one engine would have been easy to find and identify.

United Airlines Flight 175

This flight was reported to be a Boeing 767, registration number N612UA, carrying 65 people, including the crew and five hijackers. It reportedly flew into the south tower of the WTC.

Once more, the government has yet to produce one serially controlled part from the crash site that would have dispelled any questions as to the identity of the specific airplane.

American Airlines Flight 77

This was reported to be a Boeing 757, registration number N644AA, carrying 64 people, including the flight crew and five hijackers. This aircraft, with a 125-foot wingspan, was reported to have crashed into the Pentagon, leaving an entry hole no more than 65 feet wide.

Following cool-down of the resulting fire, this crash site would have been very easy to collect enough time-change equipment within 15 minutes to positively identify the aircraft registry. There was apparently some aerospace type of equipment found at the site but no attempt was made to produce serial numbers or to identify the specific parts found. Some of the equipment removed from the building was actually hidden from public view.

Conclusion

The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items, plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode.

With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the government's theoretical version of what actually caused the total destruction of the buildings, let alone proving the identity of the aircraft. That is the problem with the government's 911 story. It is time to apply the precautionary principle.

As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,335 • Replies: 40
No top replies

 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 May, 2005 07:40 pm
Oh, dear. I seem to have misplaced my tinfoil hat... can I borrow yours?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 May, 2005 11:08 pm
I am using it, thankee. (Clinging to the tinnage.)
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 May, 2005 11:11 pm
I thought it was the Jews...?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 May, 2005 11:15 pm
I thought it was the illegal immigrants?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 May, 2005 11:17 pm
The homos!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 May, 2005 11:22 pm
Atheists!
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 May, 2005 11:24 pm
A coalition of the fat and the unattractive!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 May, 2005 11:53 pm
Now you have gone too far.


'Twas the skinny and gorgeous - they could not bear the idea of their charms fading.
0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 12:00 am
Re: 911 and the Precautionary Principle:
not2know wrote:
Conclusion

The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft.


Excuse me, but I do believe that four airplanes crashed on September 11, 2000. I believe there is a multitude of evidence, including eye witness accounts and video coverage, to prove that the crashes did indeed occur.

And, if the airplanes involved were not the airline flights as stated, what happened to all those people who boarded those flights and never made it to their destination? What about the phone calls from the passengers to their loved ones just before they attempted to retake the plane that crashed in the PA field?

What are you trying to tell us?
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 12:16 am
not2know,
I am fairly new here, but have been around long enough to know that picked the wrong board to put this kind of post...hope that flames don't leave to bad of scars.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 12:45 am
Tommr

This poster makes extremely serious accusations with no evidence - indeed in the teeth of the evidence.

These are not flames, but a critique as serious as the nonsense that has been posted.
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 12:52 am
ok...so flame was the wrong term to use....just wanted to let him know that he is about to get eaten alive for 1)posting such nonsense and 2) not giving one ounce of proof for anything he has posted.
I was really impressed with the way the people chew up this kind of stuff....not sticking up for the guy at all, just warning him, as he is new and all..
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 12:57 am
Lol! Oh, ok.
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 01:13 am
Good...now that we have that all cleared up, let the beatings begin
0 Replies
 
not2know
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 11:19 am
Confused where the heck have you guys been ?
did someone say "without any proof", ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
chek this out :

9-11 Review - A Resource for Understanding the 9/11/01 Attack
9-11 CitizensWatch
9-11 Research
9-11 Review - FrontPage
9-11 Skeptics Unite
9-11 Truth Radio
9-11Truth.org - Only the Truth will Set Us Free
119 Fragen zum 11.9.
911 Hoax - Was 911 a Video Movie
911 In Plane Site - American Police State
0911.site.voila
Alex Jones Presents Infowars.com to Fight the New World Order
Alex Jones' Prison Planet.com The Earth Is Being Turned Into A Prison Planet
American Free Press
Cloak and Dagger
CNN.com - September 11 Memorial
DefenseLINK News Photos September 2001
Der inszenierte Terrorismus www.hintergrund.de
FBI PENTTBOM
FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitive - Usama Bin Laden
FEMA Photo Library
FEMA Report - Introduction
FEMA Report - WTC 1 and WTC 2 FEMA Report - WTC 3
FEMA Report - WTC 4, 5 and 6 FEMA Report - WTC 7
FEMA Report - Bankers Trust Building FEMA Report - Peripheral Buildings
FEMA Report - Observations, Findings, and Recommendations
FEMA Report - WTC Steel Data Collection
Fire Engineering - Burning Questions...Need Answers
GlobalFreePress- Dep. INN - News
Here is New York
It was a Plane Bomb
Jeff Rense Program - Nationwide Radio And Global On The Internet
Kein Krieg! - Rezensionen zum Thema 11.9.
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory - World Trade Center Disaster
LetsRoll911.org - Networking all the 911 people Together . . . United we stand!
Mathias Broeckers
Michael Moore
Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics!
Mysterium 9-11
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
Nerdcities-Guardian
NIST and the World Trade Center
Operation 9-11
Pentagon Hunt the Boeing! And test your perceptions!
PlaguePuppy's Café and Peri-Apocalypse Reading Room
PNAC.info - Exposing the Project for the New American Century
Ralf Kellerbauer - 911 reality
ReOpen 911
septembereleventh.org: 9-11 Visibility Project
September-11th.us - September 11th Patriot Day
StandDown.net - Exposing NORAD's Wag The 911 Window Dressing Tale
Telepolis-WTC Conspiracy
terrorize.dk
The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism
tomflocco.com
Unanswered Questions Thinking For Ourselves
United Flight 93 Crash Theory Home Page - The Real Story of Flight 93
wdr.de 11. September-Verschwörungstheorien
Webfairy 911 Memorial
World Trade Center - The Terrorattack - We Will Never Forget!
WTC7.net the hidden story of Building 7

www.911review.org
www.physics911.org
www.septembereleventh.org
www.serendipity.li/wtc.htm
www.wtc7.net
www.activeopposition.com

www.911forthetruth.com
www.standdown.net/USAbases.htm
www.911citizenswatch.org
www.deceptiondollar.com
www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/physics_1.html

www.911truth.org
www.gnn.tv
www.questionsquestions.net
www.911-strike.com
www.attackonamerica.net

www.cooperativeresearch.org
www.globalresearch.ca
www.propagandamatrix.com
www.whatreallyhappened.com
www.truth-now.com
www.antiwar.com
www.truthout.org

American State Terrorism www.americanstateterrorism.com

America's New Pearl Harbor? www.questionsquestions.net/pearl_harbor.html

Bush Occupation www.bushoccupation.com/welcolumn.html

Center for An Informed America http://davesweb.cnchost.com/index.htm

Center for Cooperative Research www.cooperativeresearch.org/index-old1.htm

Centre for Research on Globalization www.globalresearch.ca
[publisher of Global Outlook Magazine www.globaloutlook.ca ]

Community Currency www.communitycurrency.org

Complete 9/11 Timeline http://cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/

Democrats.com www.democrats.com

Emperor's New Clothes http://emperors-clothes.com

Enterprise Mission - Who's the Enemy? - The "End of Days" Begun? www.enterprisemission.com/tower2.htm

Fallout Shelter News www.falloutshelternews.com

From the Wilderness Publications [Michael Ruppert] www.copvcia.com

Hamilton Independent Media Centre http://hamilton.indymedia.org

Hamilton Public Inquiry Into Sept. 11 - Flora Site www.flora.org/911-inquiry/
Hamilton Public Inquiry Into Sept. 11 - Sympatico Site http://www3.sympatico.ca/katherine.jovicich/john_911/tableofcontents.htm

Honest News Source http://free.freespeech.org/americanstateterrorism/HonestNews.html

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence http://intelligence.house.gov

Human Underground - Anatomy of a Clapdown www.humanunderground.com/anatomy02.html

Independent Media Center www.indymedia.org

Info Wars www.infowars.com/resources.html

Jihad Unspun - A Clear View of the U.S. War on "Terrorism" www.jihadunspun.net/home.php

John Judge - 9/11 - What Aren't We Being Told? www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/JohnJudge/911analysis.html

Justin Raimondo - Antiwar.com - Behind the Headlines www.antiwar.com/justin/j111401.html

Malcontentx - Sept. 11 - Unanswered Questions www.communitycurrency.org/MainIndexMX.html

Media Map - September 11 - Journalist's Resources www.mediamap.com/Sept11.asp

Media Monitors Network http://nafeez.mediamonitors.net

Narco News www.narconews.com

9-11.co.uk - Who and Why? www.9-11.co.uk

9/11: Initial Reaction www.iyoco.org/911.htm

9/11 Skeptics Unite! www.osamaskidneys.com/main.html

The People's Investigation of 9/11 www.911pi.com

Petition for Impeachment Process for George W. Bush www.petitiononline.com/ippopb/petition.html

Portland Independent Media Center http://portland.indymedia.org

Propaganda Matrix www.propagandamatrix.com/thepropagandamatrix.html

Proparanoid www.proparanoid.com/truth.htm

Rense.com www.rense.com

Robert Lederman http://baltech.org/lederman/

Questions, Questions: A Review of Alternative Theories on Current Events www.questionsquestions.net

San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center http://sf.indymedia.org

Serendipity - The World Trade Center Demolition and the so-called War on Terrorism http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html

Tetrahedron www.tetrahedron.org

Truth Out http://truthout.com

Unanswered Questions - Thinking for Ourselves www.unansweredquestions.org

Wake Up America - Robert Howard - Destruction of the Trade Centers www.stargods.org/SpecialReport/

War on Freedom - Yahoo Groups http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarOnFreedom/

Washington Post - IntelligenceCIA www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/columns/intelligencia/
Washington Post - Nation - America at War www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/specials/attacked/

What Really Happened www.whatreallyhappened.com

Znet Terror War Page www.zmag.org/terrorframe.htm

I COULD GIVE A ABOUT 10,000 MORE BUT JUST DO A GOOGLE SEARCH!
0 Replies
 
not2know
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 11:23 am
i guess you are all hiding under your beds, lol
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 11:52 am
yep checked it all out

And I think 4 planes crashed that day, 'cause I saw it on telly.

Do you really expect us to believe that all the eye witnesses were hallucinating?
0 Replies
 
LionTamerX
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 11:53 am
Could someone cue the laugh track now ?

Preesh.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 May, 2005 12:00 pm
<raucous laughter from viewing audience>
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » 911 and the Precautionary Principle:
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/13/2025 at 07:11:19