Reply
Thu 5 May, 2005 11:53 am
What next, a vile of acid or a gun?
Ideally, students should be exposed to a variety of opposing views with reference to social, political and economic issues that expands their vision and enriches their college experience. Unfortunately, on most college campuses today, the main guest speakers are nothing more than mere inculcations of the university's philosophies, thus starving and suffocating free thought while promoting single-minded intolerance to the views of others.
It's a disappointment to me that when someone demonstrates a clear conflict of visions, the talk fades precipitously and following closely on its heels are physical and verbal assaults. As example, Ann Coulter was jeered off the stage of Earlham College in 2000. Then a couple months ago she became the physical target of a student at the University of Arizona. Within the past month we have seen Pat Buchanon, William Kristol and David Horowitz all being physically assaulted while speaking on colleges campuses.
How can this disingenuous behavior, eradicating any vestige of civility, be thwarted?
First, the students themselves, who appear to be satisfied with achieving low intellectual content, and who shun the rigors of free thought and free speech, share in the blame.
Second, the tone must be set by university leadership at its highest levels. More and more, today's student articulates what is in the hearts and minds of an overwhelming majority of college educators (monkey see, monkey do.). And the academic community is in denial of the extraordinary seriousness of this situation.
As the debate goes forward, I hope we begin to talk in terms of civility and mutual respect toward those whom appose our political, sociological and economic views. Otherwise, I fear we can we expect an escalation in future assaults as students take on an ever increasing flavor of violent behavior, eventually trading pies for a vile of acid or a concealed weapon.
William Kristol and David Horowitz are both going to be guests on our radio program on Saturday morning, April 23rd, to discuss these issues.
Christopher L. Dickson
AL-PIEDA for life!
These students merely realize the level of bullshit being offered by the people you list, and respond to it with the exact appopriate response.
There are times for civil discourse, and times for non-civil discourse. Coulter, Horowitz, and Kristol are nothing more than ideological thugs bent on limiting people's freedom of thought and freedom to choose what is right to teach; they deserve nothing other than what they got.
Cycloptichorn
Quote:William Kristol and David Horowitz are both going to be guests on our radio program on Saturday morning, April 23rd, to discuss these issues.
A little late there, aren't you Christopher? :-)
I'm pretty sure this forum isn't for self-promotion, by the way...
We're not here for free advertising for you, buddy
Cycloptichorn
Perhaps students are simply taking their cue from the "civilized" behavior of the genteel talking heads like the dainty Ms. Coulter.
BTW, I'm sure you meant to write 'Vial of Acid or a Gun.'
Nice try tho
Cycloptichorn
Maybe he really did mean vile
Cycloptichorn wrote:I'm pretty sure this forum isn't for self-promotion, by the way...
We're not here for free advertising for you, buddy
Cycloptichorn
This, I have to agree with you cycle.
I do not think the poster could be effective in this forun anyway.
I tried to Google search the posters name, but can't be sure.
Me thinks he is just another talking head on a radio with not much to offer in the way of useful debate.
Psychologists have proven that any attempt to surpress a person from speaking causes people to believe their point of view more. In most cases a person going to speak and being prevented from doing so will cause people to support the cause more than the person successfully speaking.