0
   

US AND THEM: US, UN & Iraq, version 8.0

 
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 May, 2005 05:05 pm
I hope the door DOES hit you in the ass. It may let a little of that hot air escape.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 May, 2005 05:08 pm
Lash, i'm surprised at you, saying that Whooda needs to let off some hot air . . . that's not playing nice with your fellow conservative.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 May, 2005 05:14 pm
That was of the order "So's your mama"...or "I know you are but what am I"....

Points: 2 out of a possible 10.

<shakes head>

Meanwhile, Whooda is hilarious.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 May, 2005 05:15 pm
Given that i had avised Whooda not to let the door hit him in the ass, and you wished it would to knock the hot air out, the inescapable conclusion was that you considered Whooda to be full of hot air.

For logical progression of thought: 0 out of a possible 10.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 May, 2005 06:15 pm
LOL.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 03:12 am
McTag wrote:
WhoodaThunk wrote:
McTag wrote:
Has anyone over there heard of George Galloway, the british MP? I hear he has been invited to address a Senate committee on the subject if Iraq and his alleged involvement in OFF. I'm wondering if any of that is being reported over there.


This was discussed near the end of the 7.0 edition of this thread. I'm too lazy to cut & paste it, but I know you're a smart guy and can find it yourself. Smile


I was referring to developments in the last few days. Galloway has been invited to appear before the committee, and he has taken them up on their offer. He is a good speaker, and the exchanges should be robust.

I don't know where the truth lies on this one, but it is refreshing that the committee has time to devote to foreigners, since american fiscal activity in that country has evidently been so proper .


The British are coming. Gorgeous George sallies forth

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4549913.stm
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 04:11 am
Well, I've finally found thread 8 and you are only forty pages in, tah rah. Rather than me reading through it all. Would someone tell me if anyone's mind has been changed. (I did read Setanta excellent reprise of events and the sadly resulting screen door/ass/vomit nonreplys. If it's all like that, don't bother.)


Meanwhile, someone asked me what I would do about Iran and North Korea. Well, first, to show my complete contempt for both my predecessor and his world allies, I would decline to sign the Kyoto treaty, just take it off the table. Then in every case thereafter I would try to show my arrogant dismissal of any other country's effort at making inroads to negotiations. Oh and yeah, I would launch a pre-emptive war just because I could really setting those Old Europe folk on their heels. Meanwhile, while those Old Europe folks were working like dogs to avert a nuclear crisis, I would I guess go ride my bicycle, hoping that somebody else, Israel or China will do something or fix it all somehow.

If something goes wrong, you know, like an actual missile test that flies over Japan, I am prepared to do what I always do.


Find someone else to blame.

Joe(I hope this helps)Nation
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 05:03 am
Ah, yes, and of course, I would send out Dr. Rice to BS everything to death: up, down, and sideways.

BTW, there was an interesting piece on "60 Minutes" last night. A Princeton philosophy guy has written an erudite academic tome (though short) entitled "On Bull ****". I will post the link if I can remember to go get it.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 05:10 am
Here 'tis:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/05/12/60minutes/main694849.shtml
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 05:17 am
Excerpt from ...[URL=file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/G/Application%20Data/Mozilla/Firefox/Profiles/li81h334.default/chrome/sage.html]Source[/URL]


Quote:
As a professional historian, I would say we still do not have enough to be sure that the Koran desecration incident took place. We have enough to consider it plausible. Anyway, the important thing politically is that some Muslims have found it plausible, and their outrage cannot be effectively dealt with by simple denial. That is why I say that Bush should just come out and say we can't be sure that it happened, but if it did it was an excess, and he apologizes if it did happen, and will make sure it doesn't happen again (if it did).

The controversy, however, seems to me to have focused on all the wrong things. The question is why all those prisoners are still being held at Guantanamo. Saar makes clear that the majority of them just had the misfortune to be dragooned onto the battlefield by the Taliban, and aren't dangerous terrorists. There are very bad characters among them, who should be tried and kept behind bars.

A reader with military experience in this area wrote me his own experience, with the Bible being trashed in a similar way. I was able to google this reader in such a way as to compare autobiographical statements and dates (stripped from the below) to the Web record, and they all check out. Even the history of attitudes, as revealed in letters to the editor, are confirmatory. So I'm sure of the authenticity of these comments.



"I'm a former US [military officer], and had the 'pleasure' of attending SERE school--Search, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape.

The course I attended . . . [had] a mock POW camp, where we had a chance to be prisoners for 2-3 days. The camp is also used as a training tool for CI [counter-intelligence], interrogators, etc for those running the camp.

One of the most memorable parts of the camp experience was when one of the camp leaders trashed a Bible on the ground, kicking it around, etc. It was a crushing blow, even though this was just a school.

I have no doubt the stories about trashing the Koran are true.

I'm sure you must also realize that Gitmo must be being used as a "laboratory" for all these psychological manipulation techniques by the CI guys. Absolutely sickening . . .

1. My gut feeling tells me that the SERE camps were 'laboratories' and part of the training program for military counter-intelligence and interrogator personnel. I heard this anecdotally as far as the training goes, but have not dug into it. This is pretty much common sense.

2. Looking at Gitmo in the 'big picture', you have to wonder why it is still in operation though they know so many are innocent of major charges. A look through history at the various 'experimentation' programs of the DOD gives a ready answer. The camp provides a major opportunity to expose a population to various psychological control techniques. Look at some of the stuff that has become public, and this becomes even more apparent. Especially the sensory deprivation--not only sleep, but there are the photos of inmates in gas masks or sight/hearing/smell deprivation setups. There has already been voluminous research into sensory deprivation, and it seems this is another good opportunity for more. One note is that sensory deprivation is used to some degree in military basic training and to a greater sense in the advanced training courses--Rangers, SEALS, etc. All part of the 'breakdown' process before recruits are 'remade'.

3. This incident with the bible trashing. Camp was [in the late 1990s]. It was towards the end of the camp experience, which was 2-3 days of captivity. We were penned in concrete cell blocks about 4' x 4' x 4'--told to kneel, but allowed to squat or sit. There was no door, just a flap that could be let down if it was too cold outside (which it was--actually light snow fell). Each trainee was interrogated to some extent, all experienced some physical interrogation such as pushing, shoving, getting slammed against a wall (usually a large metal sheet set up so that it would not seriously injure trainees) with some actually water-boarded (not me).

The bible trashing was done by one of the top-ranked leaders of the camp, who was always giving us speeches--sort of 'making it real' so to speak, because it is a pretty contrived environment. But by the end it almost seemed real. Guards spoke English with a Russian accent, wore Russian-looking uniforms. So the bible trashing happened when this guy had us all in the courtyard sitting for one of his speeches. They were tempting us with a big pot of soup that was boiling--we were all starving from a few days of chow deprivation. He brought out the bible and started going off on it verbally--how it was worthless, we were forsaken by this God, etc. Then he threw it on the ground and kicked it around. It was definitely the climax of his speech. Then he kicked over the soup pot, and threw us back in the cells. Big climax. And psychologically it was crushing and heartbreaking, and then we were left isolated to contemplate this.

And all of these moods and thoughts were created in this fake camp--just imagine how it is for these guys at Gitmo.

So many have tried to commit suicide....by now they all must have some serious psychological problems. This is without a doubt torture. Premeditated, planned....a fine lot of criminals we have in charge of the USA these days. Gitmo is so Orwellian--so Room 101. They are playing on the deepest feelings and fears."



This informed former officer has suggested the real reason for which some in the Pentagon are so angry about the Newsweek story. It may well so focus international outrage on Guantanamo that Rumsfeld will lose his little psych lab.
Mon, May 16, 2005 0:25
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 05:28 am
Joe Nation wrote:
If it's all like that, don't bother.

Well, some are still missing, so it was rather low traffic here ... and a nice experience, to switch between 7 and 8 :wink:

Which doesn't mean, however, Joe, that you really missed anything which noted already on version 1 or 2. :wink:
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 05:39 am
I'm afraid that I agree with that quote.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 05:41 am
Of Ge's, that is.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 05:48 am
Think of it in terms of my last post ... pretty scary
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 01:08 pm
BM
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 01:29 pm
Bookmark
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 01:35 pm
bowell movement . . .
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 01:35 pm
Well I'm here. Dont want to upset that cragged scary interesting countenance of McTag...

Walter you describe Switzerland as

"the last but one place of male civilisation"

about which I was going to make a very witty observation but wit and memory are two different things
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 02:20 pm
As many of the acts perpetrated against Muslims held by coalition forces are directed at cultural sensitivities as a means of 'encouraging' cooperation (techniques which appear to have been developed earlier in Israel) trashing a Koran would be nothing surprising.

And as the Tillman family would attest, the US military lying through their teeth for PR reasons would be even less surprising.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2005 03:02 pm
Blatham

why do they do it

torture I mean

(its not useful for intelligence gathering)

I think its terrorism, keeping a population subjugated by fear

?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 02/07/2025 at 08:11:33