parados wrote:Discreet wrote:Lol im still in school right now so i can;t view those sights ill check em out when i get home. But if you want i will find more evidence of how societies that failed usually accepted homosexuality.
Interesting logic. Every society that has ever failed in human history had a large heterosexual population. Are you sure that all those societies didn't fail because they embraced heterosexuality? It would make much more sense then the little bit of homosexuality that went on in them.
Good point.
And hasn't every society eventually "failed?"
I mean the vast majority last a few hundred years then die out.
There are so many holes in this theme, I don't know where to start.
There are some who claim that per capita, homosexuals contribute MORE to society than heterosexuals! But they don't make a big deal of their superiority.
If you start looking at the list of (non-100% heterosexual) entertainers, inventors, scientists, leaders of fields of all walks of life...its pretty impressive.
Perhaps societies that have a LOT OF HOMOSEXUALS thrive more than societies who completely repress homosexuals.
Look at the Greeks and all their breakthroughs. Our society is still largely based on ideas that they thought of, and they had one of the highest percentage of openly gay leaders of any society in history!
Alexander the Great was homosexual. He was the first man to bring together the Mediterranean world and dominate the known world at that time. Does this mean that homosexuals are actually superior?
Perhaps the gays are capable of building wonderful societies, and its the heterosexuals who make societies weaken and fail?
Discreet, what do you think?