7
   

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA): You Might Say That's All OK. But I Don't Think It's OK.

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 30 Mar, 2019 11:53 am
@Setanta,
Quote:
Mr. Mueller, a life-long and highly respected Republican.

In name only. Mueller is part of a cabal that included Paul Ryan, John McCain and Mitt Romney many other Republicans and hand picked Democrats. Effectively a uniparty with no regard for the people and their will. Establishment. Established by scheming and manipulating the laws and politicizing government agencies to increase their power.

Trump is not one of them and he has to go. It backfired and you have chosen to defend the scum that want to destroy this country. And Obama is up to his pencil neck in this crap.

0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Mar, 2019 01:18 pm
Damn here we go with another of his conspiracy theories. Wonder how long he can keep it going?
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 30 Mar, 2019 01:21 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Damn here we go with another of his conspiracy theories.

It is not a conspiracy it is an obvious provable fact. The new AG will be proving it shortly.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 1 Apr, 2019 11:24 am
@Setanta,
Quote:
But people like you, who love to eat Plump's **** sandwich propaganda go around blaming Mr. Obama and the Democrats. What a bunch of weenies.

The dossier which was used to kick off the "investigation" was a piece of DNC political research, paid for by Hillary and the DNC. Nothing in the dossier was proven to be correct.
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 Apr, 2019 11:37 pm
@Baldimo,
Do you have some evidence for that, other than loony rightwingnut blogs?
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Tue 2 Apr, 2019 02:34 am
@Baldimo,
Quote:
Nothing in the dossier was proven to be correct.

It didn't have to be. It was compiled as "raw data". His contacts provided the information, he forwarded it to the FBI. How much of it has been proven to be wrong?
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 2 Apr, 2019 09:30 am
@hightor,
Quote:
It didn't have to be. It was compiled as "raw data"

And used to get a FISA warrant? Wrong, the whole investigation should never had started, unproven accusations were presented as evidence, and that information was withheld from the judge.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 2 Apr, 2019 09:32 am
@Setanta,
Quote:
other than loony rightwingnut blogs?

Loony does not make them liars. Your sources are all shot down, they are proven liars.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  3  
Reply Tue 2 Apr, 2019 09:33 am
Raw data is used ALL THE TIME as justification to investigate if said raw data is valid and true.

Imagine if a drug dealer gave up some raw intel on his boss but the police were not allowed to get a warrant because the drug dealer didn’t have proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he got the drugs from his boss.

It would be impossible to solve a crime if raw data wasn’t able to be used to justify an investigation.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 2 Apr, 2019 09:37 am
@maporsche,
Quote:
Raw data is used ALL THE TIME as justification to investigate if said raw data is valid and true.

Comey said it was not proven. Therefore not valid or true. Are you calling Comey a liar?
maporsche
 
  3  
Reply Tue 2 Apr, 2019 09:44 am
@coldjoint,
How would he know before the warrant was issued and the situation investigated????

You painting yourself into a corner here, you probably don’t even know how.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 2 Apr, 2019 09:58 am
@maporsche,
Quote:
How would he know before the warrant was issued and the situation investigated?

The evidence used to get the warrant was not proven. Therefore the warrant was not legal. No corner here, just fraud by the DOJ and FBI perpetrated on the FISA judge.
maporsche
 
  3  
Reply Tue 2 Apr, 2019 10:02 am
@coldjoint,
Look at my drug dealer example and let me know if you can see where you’re wrong.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 2 Apr, 2019 10:06 am
@maporsche,
Quote:
Look at my drug dealer example and let me know if you can see where you’re wrong.

Was the dossier verified? Was the court told where it came from? I hope your drug dealer does not do too much time.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 18 Apr, 2019 09:00 am
@aaronjmate

'And this is a politician who’s pushed a discredited conspiracy theory, for his own PR:'


@RepAdamSchiff

'Just been informed by DOJ that we’ll receive Mueller’s report only after Barr gives a press conference.

Once again, Barr wants to shape the public’s perception of the report.

This is on top of reports DOJ secretly briefed the White House.

This is not justice. Just PR.'
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 20 Apr, 2019 09:04 am
Everything according to Schiff is 'not okay', apparently even impeachment.


@mtracey

'Schiff failing to advocate impeachment means that he's either a coward (buckling to political pressures) or doesn't believe his own rhetoric. Either way, not taking his stated belief to its logical conclusion exposes him as an ever bigger fraud than everyone already knew he was'

@mtracey

'Cries for impeachment are being led by "left" members of the House + Senate but it's really people like Adam Schiff who should be leading the charge. Schiff states that collusion occurred notwithstanding Mueller's finding to the contrary. Impeachment would therefore be mandatory'
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/07/2019 at 06:42:51