Baldimo
 
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2005 09:11 pm
FORT BRAGG, N.C. ?- An Army sergeant was convicted Thursday by a military jury of premeditated murder and attempted murder in a grenade and rifle attack that killed two of his comrades and wounded 14 others in Kuwait during the opening days of the Iraq war.
Hasan Akbar (search), 34, now faces a possible death penalty, which the same 15-member jury will consider at a hearing that begins Monday.
Prosecutors say Akbar told investigators he launched the attack because he was concerned U.S. troops would kill fellow Muslims in Iraq. They said he coolly carried out the attack to achieve "maximum carnage" on his comrades in the 101st Airborne Division (search).
The verdict came after only 21/2 hours of deliberations following seven days of testimony in the court-martial ?- the first time since the Vietnam era that an American has been prosecuted on charges of murdering a fellow soldier during wartime.
Akbar stood at attention as the verdict was read by the colonel who headed the jury panel, biting his lip but giving no other outward sign of emotion. Defense attorneys acknowledged that Akbar carried out the attack, but argued he was too mentally ill to have premeditated it and was fueled by emotion.
Killed in the middle-of-the-night attack were Army Capt. Christopher Seifert (search), 27, who was shot in the back, and Air Force Maj. Gregory Stone (search), 40, who suffered 83 shrapnel wounds. The 101st was preparing to move into Iraq in support of the U.S. invasion when the attack occurred on March 22, 2003.
"Sgt. Akbar executed that attack with a cool mind," prosecutor Capt. Robert McGovern said during closing arguments, cocking Akbar's unloaded M-4 rifle and pulling the trigger twice for emphasis. "He sought maximum carnage."
The mothers of the slain soldiers wept during closing arguments as prosecutors flashed pictures of their dead bodies on a screen. When a prosecutor pointed at Akbar, nearly yelling that he was responsible, Akbar sipped from a coffee mug. The mothers declined to comment after the verdict, as did Akbar's parents.
Defense attorney Maj. Dan Brookhart countered that Akbar was concerned the invasion of Iraq would result in the deaths of Muslims and that U.S. soldiers would rape Iraqi women. Akbar's father issued a statement this week saying his son was the source of harassment by fellow soldiers because he is a Muslim.
Brookhart also said the prosecution's depiction of Akbar as a cold-blooded killer ignored that the defendant was sufficiently mentally ill ?- though not insane ?- to be confused and fearful about the impending invasion of Iraq.
The defense lawyer scoffed at an Army psychiatrist's testimony that Akbar suffered merely from "the blues" ?- not any serious mental problems.
"It doesn't make any sense. This guy doesn't have the blues," he said. "He is mentally ill."
Brookhart said Akbar's actions after the initial attack showed he wasn't intent on achieving maximum destruction. He said Akbar stopped his attack with a nearly full clip still in his M-4 rifle and three more grenades. He also noted the defendant didn't try to flee during the chaos following the attack.
Akbar, who turned 34 Thursday, was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and three counts of attempted first-degree murder. Jurors ?- nine officers and six non-commissioned officers ?- had the ability to consider lesser charges, but chose not to.
If sentenced to death, Akbar would become the sixth soldier on military death row at Fort Leavenworth, Kan.
The case was moved from Fort Campbell, Ky., home of the 101st, to Fort Bragg because the division still was in Iraq and Bragg is home of the 101st's higher command.

Link
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This has got to be the worst crime you can commit in the Military. To kill ones battle buddies and then claim some sort of mental disorder is awful.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 963 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2005 09:14 pm
Perhaps you meant fratricide, the killing of one's brother? I know it is bad form to take notice of spelling errors, but they are so glaring when they are a part of the title.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2005 09:17 pm
I think a man would have to be suffering from some sort of mental disorder to be able to do that. It's inconceivable that any sane person would kill the very people on whom his own life depends, with whom he has trained and broken bread. This guy is nuttier than the proverbial fruitcake.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2005 09:24 pm
Setanta wrote:
Perhaps you meant fratricide, the killing of one's brother? I know it is bad form to take notice of spelling errors, but they are so glaring when they are a part of the title.


Spelling in the title has been corrected.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Apr, 2005 09:27 pm
Although not normally given to visions of cruelty, i do think mass killings warrant a little torture before the actual execution of the convict.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Guilty of Fratricide!
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/05/2026 at 07:15:32