1
   

Strip the Catholic Church of their tax exemption.

 
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 07:23 am
Merry
Maybe I was not clear enough. I said I would not vote for a devout catholic. One who would follow the dictates of the man in the Vatican not those of the US citizenry.
PS. I voted for kennedy also.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 07:30 am
I don't care if a presidential candidate is a devout anything. The important thing for me is that the person has clear boundries, and adheres to the Constitution. For me, a presidential candidate needs to follow the Constitution, even if certain parts of it goes against his faith. His first loyalty needs to be to the US, and not his religion. If his religion comes first, he has no business being president.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 12:44 pm
Well said, Phoenix. I doubt that a presidential candidate could even get to the position of being a candidate if it was apparent that he/she would put prcedence on orders from the Vatican over orders from the constituency. But, again, we're off-topic on the taxation question.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 12:54 pm
I suppose we need to come up with a test for the devoutness of a candidate.

I don't know of any candidate in history that ever took orders from his or her religion. Bush has certainly pissed off the Religious right on several occasions. Historically Kennedy pissed off the Vatican, and there is no question but that Nixon pissed off the Quakers (yes Nixon was a Quaker).

Any candidate comes with a set of his or her beliefs, values and priorities. That's democracy.

If a candidate has a set of values that I disagree with, she will not get my vote. I would suggest you do the same.

I agree with the principle that someone should not be excluded from any aspect of public life because of his or her religion.

Of course, you can use your vote any way you would like.
0 Replies
 
watchmakers guidedog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Apr, 2005 01:11 am
ebrown_p wrote:
Religious groups have a special place in our society. They give many citizens a sense fulfillment and purpose.


Would this not occur if church income was taxed?

Quote:
They are responsible for the civil rights movement, the end of child labor, the end of slavery, the institution of public hospitals and anti-war movements since the Revolution.


(leaving aside questioning the veracity of these claims) Would this not occur if church income was taxed?

I posit that if church income was taxed then neither of these aspects would be changed in the least. Ergo, that argument is irrelevant.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.33 seconds on 04/30/2025 at 10:09:12