1
   

Policy: What has happened to politics?

 
 
GERROM
 
Reply Wed 13 Apr, 2005 06:54 pm
There seems to be a politic of destruction loose in the world today. This is nowhere more visible than the US.

Although I'm long in tooth, my memory recalls a time when "Honorable Enemies" sat in an "August Body" to deliberate on the issues of the day. The media reported rather than entertained. It was not perfect and I'm sure we cannot return as the world has moved on.

Although the world has changed, thats obvious, we could learn from history, and reinvent our cooperative and consensus policies of the past. It would certainly be better and more productive than the politics of slash and burn, us vis them, and the cold bowl of revenge on those who worked before you.

No group holds the high ground in this death society. The media and other forms of communication have turned into arguments, not discussions.

Please explain to me what is served if any side were to finally win on all counts, in all three branches of government? Do you think you could live under a government that was controlled by one set of principles be they liberal or conservative?

Let say the three branches of government we all filled with "your kind of people", for example people who believe in the Hoover or Brookings Institute policies.

What would you do under the consolidation of power under one system of belief, again either liberal or conservative?


Would it not serve a higher good to try to solve some of these differences rather than trying to be the winner of the fight between liberal/conservative, right/left or good/evil. Is death the only solution?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 630 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Apr, 2005 01:18 am
As ferr'iner I've been thinking about that for some time. I just didn't express it so well Smile
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Apr, 2005 03:50 am
My take on this is that the public are so "bad" that we have to be lied to and bamboozled.Television has done this to us.
There are two types of television.The only type that is any good is where it acts like a very high powered pair of binoculars.The coverage of a sporting event for example where what you see,as in the Grand National,would have been taking place had TV not been invented.Once the tapes go up at the start you see something pure.It is merely a production value to render the binocular effect more perfect.Even a football match retains most of this sort of purity but less than a horse race.
The other type of television,which is where the problem is,is generated out of television itself and your brain is being manipulated by television people.This gets bewildering and the more so the more you know about such a tautological process.
Politics,being easy and cheap to cover,is very useful for TV companies profit margins and allows them to exert influence on policy as well which is against the grain of the democratic process in that they have not been elected and their recruitment procedures are veiled in such a mist that it is easy to suspect nepotism as the prime agent and that is a force which the French people were forced to do something about in the late 18th century.I say forced because a nepotistic power cannot stop itself from eating everything else up in the nature of things.The odd thing is that television is very quick to point to such failings in other areas of life.
Because television is an urban phenomena urban values are precedent to rural values.Fox-hunting has not been banned to save foxes.It has been banned because campaigns to ban it made cheap and easy TV and the target of the campaign was a rural minority who probably didn't consume television much as they are too busy producing food at prices which leave us with something left over to buy other products advertised.

My gut feeling is that the second type of television should be excised from our lives but I have no expectation of this being done until it becomes a neccessity.Ratings chasing is a ridiculous idea because it tries to be all things to all people and that sort of thing looks daft even in the pub.The inoffensive Mr Nice Guy has an inferiority complex and so does television because it knows that all the second type of TV is one giant falsehood.Neither will ever admit it though.
Watch for the "cuts and joins" which you don't see in sports coverage unless a streaker gets on the scene.Once you see "cuts and joins" you do not know what it is.Somebody with an agenda did the cutting and the joining.OK?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Policy: What has happened to politics?
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/03/2026 at 02:25:20