1
   

Senate rejects proposal to boost spending for VA hospitals

 
 
rodeman
 
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 03:29 pm
I thought it was the Democrats who were "weak" on military spending??


By Ken Guggenheim, Associated Press, 4/12/2005 16:42


WASHINGTON (AP) Republicans on Tuesday beat back a Democratic attempt to provide almost $2 billion in additional health care funding for veterans, rejecting claims that Veterans Affairs hospitals are in crisis.

The proposal was part of an $80.6 billion emergency spending bill for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and other costs. The bill would give President Bush slightly less than the $82 billion he sought. It is also less than the $81.4 billion approved by the House.

The Senate's Republican leaders hoped to have the bill approved by the end of the week and ready for Bush's signature by the end of the month. But the timing of the bill has become uncertain, with Senate leaders dealing with stacks of amendments and a possible battle over immigration restrictions.

The first debate came Tuesday over a proposal by Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., to provide an additional $1.98 billion for veteran's care. She said VA hospitals are underfunded and overcrowded.

''There's a train wreck coming,'' Murray warned.

Republicans denied the VA had such serious problems. They noted the Bush administration said the additional funding wasn't needed and that it had enough money to cope with emergencies.

Murray's proposal was defeated in a 54-46 vote, mostly along party lines.

Immigration issues posed a potentially greater obstacle for the bill's swift passage.

The House version of the bill includes measures to tighten border security, such as requiring states to verify they aren't giving drivers licenses to illegal immigrants, giving judges broader
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said he has been urging senators to hold off on its immigration and border security proposals until the Senate has a chance to consider separate, more comprehensive legislation. But he could offer no assurances that the House provisions wouldn't remain in the final version of the bill worked out in conference by House and Senate negotiators.

''This whole idea of having people ... predict what's coming out of conference, it's just premature,'' Frist told reporters.

Among the possible immigration amendments is one from Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, that would offer amnesty to some illegal immigrant farm workers. Craig is seeking assurances the Senate will consider his proposal soon if he does not offer it now as part of the Iraq spending bill.

Other amendments include proposals to raise benefits for the families of soldiers who die on duty and to prevent the Senate from reducing the number of aircraft carriers in its fleet to 11 from 12.

The bill number is H.R. 1268.

On the Net:

For bill text: http://thomas.loc.gov
Quote:
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 661 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
coachryan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Apr, 2005 11:37 pm
As if that wasn't enough:

Quote:
On a straight party-line vote, Republicans rejected an open rule, which would have given the Democratic Members who brought more than 30 thoughtful amendments to the Rules Committee the chance to have their ideas debated on the House floor.

The Republican Members also voted against exempting the men and women fighting for our country in Iraq and Afghanistan from the bankruptcy bill's so-called "means test." They opposed an amendment by Rep. Marty Meehan of Massachusetts (amendment # 23) that would protect disabled veterans who have developed financial problems due to their combat service and they voted against another amendment (amendment # 12) requiring credit counseling agencies to provide free services to men and women who have recently left the military after serving in combat zones.

"Our veterans deserve so much more. This legislation will have a horrible impact on our brave boys and girls returning home from military service. We should be making their transition back into private life as easy as possible. This legislation throws up roadblocks and makes that transition all the more difficult," said Rep. Louise M. Slaughter, Ranking Member of the House Committee on Rules.


My wife is from a military family and so are many of my costumers and employees. I've seen first hand how hardit is to make ends meet for a military family period, doubly so when your spouse if overseas serving our country.

Bankruptcy Bill: What Happened Today?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Jun, 2005 05:43 am
And 2 months later the Veterans administration suddenly finds themselves $1 billion short.

I loved the verbal exchange between the Bush cabinet member Jim Nicholson last week and a couple of Democratic lawmakers when he was asked if there was a "problem" since they were $1 billion short and he wouldn't admit there was one. His response was, "Its not a crisis."

And a day later...

AP story

Quote:
Senate votes to boost veterans' health aid

By MARY DALRYMPLE
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER


Veteran Affairs Secretary James Nicholson prepares to testify before an emergency hearing of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee to discuss his department's budget shortfall on Capitol Hill, Washington, Tuesday, June 27. 2005. At left is general counsel Tim McClain and right are unidentified staffers. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
WASHINGTON -- Lawmakers called Veterans Affairs Secretary Jim Nicholson to the Capitol for a third day to examine a politically awkward $1 billion shortfall in veterans health care programs while awaiting a Bush administration request for more money.

Republicans scrambled to fill the health care deficit and cut off continuous criticism from Democrats, who said the GOP should have acted earlier to make sure veterans get adequate care.

The Senate voted 96-0 on Wednesday to give the VA an extra $1.5 billion this year to cover its health care shortfall and more, letting the VA carry any unused money into next year.

"Think about this for a second," said Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev. "The administration sends hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops abroad to fight in Iraq and elsewhere but says it didn't expect they would return home and need health care services."

Republicans said they resisted Democrats' earlier efforts to boost spending for veterans health programs because VA officials assured them they didn't need the money.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Jun, 2005 06:41 am
That is true. Nicholson had been advised the money was right. (Which I could have told them as a stupid mistake or a bold faced lie.) He later said he'd been wrong and Santorum stated that Patty Murray had been correct all along.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Jun, 2005 07:01 am
I recently read that the Bush administration was allocating one billion $'s to cover hospitals costs for the treatment of undocumented aliens. Got to take care of the cheep labor.

Bush's support for the troops is with his mouth only. He should put his money where his mouth is.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Senate rejects proposal to boost spending for VA hospitals
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/18/2025 at 12:34:43