0
   

YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK

 
 
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 08:46 am
YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK

Every year the Citizens Against Government Waste publishes their annual list of federal pork-barrel spending. It's called the Congressional Pig Book. To get an idea where your hard-earned tax dollars are going, it's worth taking a look at what made this year's list.

In a list of some 14,000 pork projects, supported by politicians of both parties, the total tab for this year's spending is $27.3 billion. With a national debt in the trillions and an annual deficit of hundreds of billions, this is all the more outrageous because it's borrowed money. So not only are politicians buying votes with pork-barrel spending, but they're financing it. So now future generations will pay interest on today's pork.

At any rate, here are some of the projects that made the list:

$3,000,000 for the Cal Ripken Sr. Foundation. That's interesting...I thought foundations were for private, charitable foundations. And since when is Cal Ripken's dad hurting for cash?
$1.7 million for the International Fertilizer Development Center. With all the crap in Washington, you'd think they'd have all the free fertilizer they need.
$100,000 for the Tiger Woods Foundation. Tiger Woods was the highest-paid athlete in the world last year, with earnings of $80 million. Why you and I need to kick in a hundred grand for his foundation is beyond me.
The list goes on and on. There are some that are outraged at the list of wasteful spending, but just pause and ask yourself. Do you expect your Congressman or woman to "bring home the bacon?" Perhaps you're part of the crowd that thinks government spending is free money, and everyone should get their "fair share."

Oh, and when it comes to government spending, there no longer is any difference between Democrats and Republicans. In fact, George Bush and the Congressional Republicans are the biggest spenders in this nation's history.

Boortz
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 503 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 08:57 am
Politicians no matter the level are above all politicians. And must pay off the ones that brung them inorde to get reelected. . Constituents first nation------?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 09:42 am
Left out a step, AU.

Corporations, then Constituents, then the Nation...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 10:20 am
I always felt a line item veto MIGHT help in this area.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 10:24 am
Good luck with that one; Bush hasn't vetoed a single spending bill since he came into office, and he's not about to start now...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 10:27 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Good luck with that one; Bush hasn't vetoed a single spending bill since he came into office, and he's not about to start now...

Cycloptichorn



Good luck with "what" one?

You do not think a line item veto would help?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 10:32 am
I think it would help tremendously!

But I don't think the current group would dream of enacting it, let alone using it.

Cheers

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 10:41 am
Bush never saw a spending bill he did not like. He loves to borrow and spend. I begin to wonder if he knows the loans need be paid back, with interest.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 10:50 am
au1929 wrote:
Bush never saw a spending bill he did not like. He loves to borrow and spend. I begin to wonder if he knows the loans need be paid back, with interest.


Bush...Bush...Bush...Bush...

As if he is the FIRST AND ONLY President guilty of this.

Very objective analysis!
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 10:52 am
Well, he's certainly not the only president guilty of rampant spending. But it does seem rather odd that he is the representative of the (classically) small gov't, low-budget, fiscally responsible party, and is the spendingest president in history?

I don't know of a single other Prez. who didn't veto a single bill...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 11:06 am
The "foundations" are likely set up to do some social good and receive money by way of grants. Don't know that to be true, but suspect it is like the money doled out to churches through the faith based initiative. They could either say in their list that the Southern Baptist Association received $2.3 million, or that it was part of what was designated as Faith based, and how it is perceived would change based on that, IMO.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2005 11:57 am
Oinkers reward US politicians who thrive on pork
By Andrew Ward in Washington
Published: April 6 2005 19:35 | Last updated: April 7 2005 00:16

Three hundred thousand dollars to improve public transport at Disneyland in California; $25,000 to fund the study of Mexican mariachi music in Nevada schools; $70,000 for the Paper Industry Hall of Fame in Wisconsin; and $100,000 to a charitable foundation run by Tiger Woods, the multi-millionaire golfer.

These were among the winners in the 2005 Oinkers, an annual award ceremony in Washington to recognise the most egregious examples of pork barrel spending by vote-hungry US politicians.

Pork barrel spending public funds secured by politicians to promote special interests, usually in their own constituencies increased 19 per cent to a record $27.3bn last year, according to Citizens Against Government Waste, which organises the Oinkers.

"With the nation at war and a record deficit you would think that our members of Congress would restrain themselves," said Tom Schatz, president of CAGW. "Instead, they have continued to shamelessly issue their pork."

The Oinkers were awarded as Congress begins to negotiate the 2006 federal budget, against the backdrop of a $427bn deficit that President George W. Bush has promised to halve by the time he leaves office.

Jeff Flake, a Republican congressman from Arizona and campaigner against wasteful spending, said his party had betrayed its commitment to small government and fiscal responsibility since it took control of the House and Senate three years ago.

"Republicans for years ridiculed Democrats for their pork, and right so," he said. "But we have come into power and made it worse."


*McGentrix - I couldn't agree more.*

Ted Stevens, an Alaska Republican, won the Hogzilla Award as the senator who took back the most amount of pork to his state, with a total of $646m, or $984 for every Alaskan.

"Most Alaskans would rather have had the cheque," said Mr Schatz. A spokeswoman for Mr Stevens said all the spending was worthwhile.

Texas received the least amount of pork at $2.90 per person, compared with a national average of $33.

Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican, who helped announce the Oinkers accompanied by two live pigs, highlighted $469,000 spent promoting wild turkey hunting as a "traditional North American sport".

Some of the worst abuses involved homeland security, with politicians exploiting heavy spending on anti-terrorism measures to fund local projects that often did little to make the country safer, according to Mr Schatz.

Mr Flake has proposed legislation to make it more difficult for lawmakers to attach pork barrel projects to appropriations bills.

source
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 06:21:25