Re: perceptions
chris2a wrote:No one really "practices" a particular religion. Religion is simply a reflection and an extension of culture.
If i may, to say that religion is "merely a reflection and extension of culture" is nothing but an overly objective and closed mind approach, wich indicates a lack of experience in the matter, or perhaps just unsatisfactory experience. There is more to religion than that. It involves personal development for people who choose to make it about that as well. It also can provide wisdom to the person who practices it.
I say practice, because, according to the dictionary, to practice means "to repeat an action in order to achieve skill" To achieve skill in a religion is to deepen ones comprehension of the texts, rituals and insights, and also to strengthen the habits of that religon.
Someone who was raised according to the standards of a particular nationality and culture can believe in, and practice a religion that is alien to that nationality and culture, and that is proven by the large following of American buddhists in Nova Scotia Canada.
I can only speak for my own experiences with buddhism, because I have only dabbled casually in other religions, and i have stuck with buddism for a little bit longer. I have experienced altered states of conciousness through meditation, i have awakened/developed kindness, acceptance, perceptiveness, awareness, and a greater understanding in general in what motivates people, and in some ways i seem to have a wider view of existence.
I would consider it a religion, because there are rituals, though they are not designed to bolster faith, and they have mind training results in the individual. in fact, if one puts blind faith into buddhism, he is missing the point.
Buddhism guides people, but towards their hearts, rather than towards spiritual perfection.
Perhaps it is not a cold and rational answer, however not everyone believes that one has to be objective to arrive at truth.
As for the difference between religion and faith:
look it up in the dictionary. it is a matter of linguistics, not philosophy.