Re: Does faith = religion?
Faith in uncertainty is not religious. Adherence to science's ideals & practices can be religious & in my opinion should be endorsed by the state.
I think it's hard to believe there are "scientific theories" unexplainable even by the scientists who formulated them. There are a god awful number of theories not understood by 'everyone'.
There's distinct & peculiar differences between the faith one has regarding god's will & faith one has in scientific principles. The first & most glaring difference is semantic, e.g. having faith a loved one will beat cancer because a million people prayed accordingly versus having faith ice will float in water. The former example is illogical; the latter is logical. These two 'faiths' correspond to religious faith & scientific faith respectively.
A second distinction is based on integrity. Faith regarding god's will is illogical
because it's unwarranted except for it's own sake. A person has faith in god's will <i>because</i> having said faith is a virtue of one's faith. Having faith in a scientific 'theory' is warranted when the theory survives scrutiny. No scientist has faith in a scientific 'theory' once it's proven false, unless the scientist is insane.
Quote:
Does faith in uncertainty = religion? Does love = religion? Does love = uncertain faith?
No, faith in uncertainty is not religion & I doubt such a faith-type exists. Based on your description, it appears to be an apologetic leap of faith (forgive the pun) to associate scientific adherence to uncertainty & religion.
Love has nothing to do with faith or religion.