Reply
Tue 29 Mar, 2005 02:52 pm
This could be interesting. I will stay tuned!
Interesting is an understatement Phoenix..
if you want me to take that post down blue..
just tell me.
I just figured it would bring about more conversation if people could just open the thread and see what you are talking about..
those of us ( like me ) who are on dial up. sometimes have a hard time opening diffrent pages and may skip what could be a very interesting article...
Somehow I think we will all regret this...
McGentrix wrote:Why is this regretful?
I don't know about blue, but I was speaking of bringing up the topic, not the events.
no problem she wolf.
McGentrix because it's a pot stirrer, and besides, that's why I brought it up.
That's not a lie, it's a spinning of the truth. Misdirection if you will. :wink:
Seems like an entirely different issue. I hadn't read about it yet. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
I wonder what his mom and dad will do if things get bad.
Agree with McG - dont really see much of a comparison. Its not like anyone said, a propos of the S. case: oh yeah, lets let everyone who relies on a feeding tube die.
So, do you suppose he will feel the same way about this artifical means of life when he is unable to do anything for himself but lay there dying?
Get back to me on this in 15 years, if and only if, he has also been declared to be in a permanent vegatative state for that same amount of time.
Doesnt the catholic church consider a g-tube ( feeding tube) artificial means of sustaining life?
shewolfnm wrote:Doesnt the catholic church consider a g-tube ( feeding tube) artificial means of sustaining life?
nope. Check out my thread on this. The pope states that it is not.
The feeding tube the Pope is to get is to supplement his nutrition. It will be given by way of a nose tube. The Pope continues to be able to eat and drink in the normal manner. There is no comparison between Shiavo's condition and that of the Pope.