Government Documents on Torture

Incident date: 6/21/03

Investigation into an incident of two soldiers assaulting an Iraqi civilian who had been taken into custody of the US Army - near Iraq Museum of Military History, Baghdad, Iraq. Investigation established probable cause to believe that the two soldiers committed the offense of assault and dereliction of duty when they assaulted an Iraqi citizen. Acts included forcing detainee to hold a pistol so soldier could have excuse for shooting detainee. Only one of the soldiers was found guilty and given a reduction in rank.

Table includes 10 substantiated incidents, 10 unsubstantiated incidents and one "other" (detainee death investigated with no allegation of abuse), 3 investigations pending. Includes details of incidents. Substantiated incidents include: beating detainees with fists; holding pistol to detainee's head while another Marine took a picture, and photographing detainee with American Flag draped over detainee's body (Karbala, Iraq); spraying detainee with fire extinguisher; electric shocking detainee (Al Mahmudiya, Iraq); burning detainee's hands (2nd degree burns) (Al Mumudiyah, Iraq).[/size]

That's why abusing the word "torture" doesn't do anyone justice. Torture is the most extreme form of abuse. When you start throwing the term around, it loses it's real meaning.

What happened in Abu Ghraib when Saddam was in charge compared to what happened when the US was in charge isn't even comparable. Yet you have no problem using the same language to describe both. I believe that to be both disingenuous and offensive.

The word torture is used to describe corporal punishment by the left and has been used so often they are brainwashed as to what it truly means to be tortured.

Shame on you.

Sat 26 Mar 2005

US probe unveils new Iraq jail abuse claims

ALAN MCEWEN


A US Army investigation found systematic abuse and possible torture of Iraqi prisoners at a base near the city of Mosul, just as top military officials became aware of abuse allegations at Abu Ghraib, newly-released documents show.

Records previously released by the army have detailed abuses at Abu Ghraib, outside Baghdad, and other sites in Iraq, as well as at sites in Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The new documents, released last night, were the first to reveal abuses at the jail in Mosul and are among the few to allege torture directly.

An officer found that detainees "were being systematically and intentionally mistreated" at the holding facility in December 2003. The 311th Military Intelligence Battalion of the army's 101st Airborne Division ran the lockup.

"There is evidence that suggests the 311th MI personnel and/or translators engaged in physical torture of the detainees," a memo from the investigator said. The January 2004 report said the prisoners' rights under the Geneva Conventions were violated.

The military became aware of the Abu Ghraib abuses in January 2004, when pictures were turned over to investigators. The resulting uproar after the pictures became public tarnished the military's image worldwide and sparked investigations of detainee abuses.

The records about the Mosul jail were part of more than 1200 pages of documents referring to allegations of prisoner abuse. The army released the records to reporters and to the American Civil Liberties Union, which had filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.

"They show the torture and abuse of detainees was routine, and such treatment was considered an acceptable practice by US forces," ACLU lawyer Amrit Singh said.

Guards at the detention facility near Mosul came from at least three infantry units of the 101st Airborne, including an air-defence artillery unit. The investigating officer, whose name was blacked out of the documents, said the troops were poorly trained and were encouraged to abuse prisoners.

According to the report, the abuse included:

• Forcing detainees to perform exercises such as deep knee bends for hours on end, to the point of exhaustion;

• Blowing cigarette smoke into the sandbags the prisoners were forced to wear as hoods;

• Throwing cold water on prisoners in a room that was between 40 degrees (4.4 Celsius) and 50 degrees (ten Celsius);

• Blasting the detainees with heavy-metal music, yelling at them and banging on doors and ammunition cans.

No-one was punished for the abuses, because the investigating officer said there was insufficient proof against any individual. The report did not say what actions might have amounted to torture or the individuals who might have committed them. The investigator ruled that troops were responsible for the broken jaw of a 20-year-old detainee who had been rounded up with his father, a suspected member of the Fedayeen Saddam guerrilla group.

The records also contained details of other abuse investigations. In one, soldiers admitted they had rounded up suspected looters near Baghdad in the summer of 2003, stripped them naked and told them to walk home.

The staff sergeant in charge of that unit said he knew what he did was wrong, but he wanted to humiliate the looters so much they would never return.

The sergeant was given an "other than honourable" discharge, and two other soldiers involved in the stripping incident were given letters of reprimand, said army spokesman Col Jeremy Martin.

In another incident, soldiers from a Howitzer battery beat three detainees in September 2003. Col Martin said all four received non-judicial punishment, which can include letters of reprimand, fines or reductions in rank.

The soldiers said they were angered by what the detainees had done. One prisoner had shot at US soldiers while hiding behind a group of children, they claimed, and another was accused of forging passports for possible terrorists.

"I think any American and soldier would have acted as I did," a soldier wrote in a statement.