My quote was
. Spoken like a true bigot. Concentrate on the world view of the group of scientists and the publication rather than the facts.
I meant Spoken like a true bigot who concentrates on the world view of the group of scientists and the publication rather than the facts.
I did, and to my un surprise I saw that they would introduce your "Experts" first based upon their religious views first. and not their scientific expertise.
Sounds a bit like the Trump Whitehouse."**** the law and th Constitution" we must first protect the President!!"
So, the introduction describing the religious views of the person disqualifies their argument? Why not just discuss where their argument is flawed?
I haven't seen Trump do anything unconstitutional yet, could you give an example?