114
   

Where is the US economy headed?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 02:37 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawk, You're wrong; you can't support a party that doesn't know how to compromise or come up with their own plans (in detail) on how they will create jobs. The best Obama can do under current conditions with congress it that he knows anything he presents will be challenged.

The blame game doesn't work against Obama who is trying - against the GOP is will try to defeat anything Obama presents.

All while they don't present any solutions to create jobs. In this case, something is better than nothing.
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 03:01 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:

EDIT: Cantor I think it was two days ago has already made it clear that the Obama "IT'S GOING TO BE MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY!" approach will not work, it is disrespectful of Congress and the Constitution, and they they will nail him for trying to pull this BS.


How, exactly, is that any different than the Republicans saying 'my way or the highway' on every other bill this year?

There's no disrespect at all in what Obama is saying or doing. But, don't let that stop you from your usual shitty analysis.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 03:21 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I do wish you would tell us ci. what a "job" is in your opinion. You use the words "creating jobs" as a magical incantation. A lot of "jobs" are not jobs at all from an economic point of view. What sort of jobs do you think should be created?

Why should anybody compromise with a plan that they see, rightly or wrongly, as damaging? There may not be a plan to come up with in the circumstances. "Something" is not automatically better than nothing.
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 03:47 pm
@spendius,
Let see Spendius we blow apart the great depression by building tanks and war planes!!!!!!

The economic is power by having buying power in the hands of the working class and the middle class and how and why that buying power is placed in their hands are of secondary important to just having that condition existing instead of having less and less and less such funds in the hands of the bulk of the population.

With the nation infrastructure needing to have so must work done on it that would be a far more useful economic task then tanks buildings however once more that is almost beside the point.

We need to free up a large part of the total wealth of this society from the .01 percents of the population and get it back into circulation one more creating demands for good and services.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 03:48 pm
@BillRM,
I would also add that companies were strictly limited in their profiteering back then - which meant that more and more profits were actually pumped back into more jobs, and less into fat-cat pockets.

Cycloptichorn
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 03:51 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

I would also add that companies were strictly limited in their profiteering back then - which meant that more and more profits were actually pumped back into more jobs, and less into fat-cat pockets.

Cycloptichorn


Please elaborate. What limits existed then on corporate profits that don't exist now?
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 03:58 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

I would also add that companies were strictly limited in their profiteering back then - which meant that more and more profits were actually pumped back into more jobs, and less into fat-cat pockets.

Cycloptichorn


Please elaborate. What limits existed then on corporate profits that don't exist now?


From Wikipedia:

Quote:
The crisis of World War II led Congress to pass four excess profits statutes between 1940 and 1943. The 1940 rates ranged from 25 to 50 percent and the 1941 ones from 35 to 60 percent. In 1942 a flat rate of 90 percent was adopted, with a postwar refund of 10 percent; in 1943 the rate was increased to 95 percent, with a 10 percent refund. Congress gave corporations two alternative excess profits tax credit choices: either 95 percent of average earnings for 1936–1939 or an invested capital credit, initially 8 percent of capital but later graduated from 5 to 8 percent. In 1945 Congress repealed the tax, effective 1 January 1946. The Korean War induced Congress to reimpose an excess profits tax, effective from 1 July 1950 to 31 December 1953. The tax rate was 30 percent of excess profits with the top corporate tax rate rising from 45% to 47%, a 70 percent ceiling for the combined corporation and excess profits taxes.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excess_profits_tax

We should be taking similar measures in our current crisis. And let me just preemptively say that I'm already bored with your counter-arguments.

Cycloptichorn
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 04:05 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
I agree that it is helpful to keep profiteering down however even when that was not under control as in when the North were fighting the civil war the outcome was still all to the good in an economic sense with the North spending funds like there was no tomorrow and once more placing wealth in the hands of the working class.

Now we are doing just the reverse with cutting pay and benefits to such useful citizens as teachers, police and fire fighters for example.


0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 04:09 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
I mistakenly assumed you were referring to the era before WWII.

Our wartime economy did indeed involve significant restrictions on profits by corporations. it also involved the rationing and assignment of commodities to producers and consumers by the government instead of markets, as well as wage and price controls - they all necessarily go together. This amounted to profound restrictions on the freedom and liberty of Americans, but were rationalized by the temporary exigencies of the war. All this was quickly abandoned at the war's end.

Is that what you are advocating now ?
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 04:11 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

I mistakenly assumed you were referring to the era before WWII.


Sorry, I should have been clear that I was responding to this line of Bill's -

Quote:

Let see Spendius we blow apart the great depression by building tanks and war planes!!!!!!


Quote:
Our wartime economy did indeed involve significant restrictions on profits by corporations. it also involved the rationing and assignment of commodities to producers and consumers by the government instead of markets, as well as wage and price controls - they all necessarily go together. This amounted to profound restrictions on the freedom and liberty of Americans, but was rationalized by the temporary exigencies of the war.

Is that what you are advocating now ?


We should have done this during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, yes. But instead, we did nothing to control profiteering and asked no sacrifice of our populace - and we got what we deserved in return, a mountain of debt, flat job growth, and negative wage growth. But the wealthy sure did great!

I wouldn't be upset for a second if an 'excessive profits tax' were imposed on US businesses. But, you knew that already.

Cycloptichorn
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 04:28 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

We should have done this during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, yes. But instead, we did nothing to control profiteering and asked no sacrifice of our populace - and we got what we deserved in return, a mountain of debt, flat job growth, and negative wage growth. But the wealthy sure did great!

I wouldn't be upset for a second if an 'excessive profits tax' were imposed on US businesses. But, you knew that already.

Cycloptichorn


I think you would have a very hard time demonstrating that the loss of our manufacturing industry and its replacement by lower paying unskilled jobs in the service industry (the cause of flat wage growth & unemployment) was a consequence of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 05:15 pm
@georgeob1,
How are the waiters in the Yacht Club got up George?
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 05:26 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:
I think you would have a very hard time demonstrating that the loss of our manufacturing industry and its replacement by lower paying unskilled jobs in the service industry (the cause of flat wage growth & unemployment) was a consequence of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

For once, I agree with George.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 05:28 pm
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:

georgeob1 wrote:
I think you would have a very hard time demonstrating that the loss of our manufacturing industry and its replacement by lower paying unskilled jobs in the service industry (the cause of flat wage growth & unemployment) was a consequence of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

For once, I agree with George.


Good thing that wasn't the argument I made, then.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 05:30 pm
@Thomas,
I believe we're in a new era of understanding; georgeob said he agreed with me this week, and now Thomas...
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 05:32 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
I believe we're in a new era of understanding; georgeob said he agreed with me this week, and now Thomas...

I worry if George is feeling alright.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 05:57 pm
@Thomas,
Shocked Mr. Green

Nothing a little drinking wouldn't fix. Drunk Drunk Drunk
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 05:58 pm
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:
I believe we're in a new era of understanding; georgeob said he agreed with me this week, and now Thomas...

I worry if George is feeling alright.


It's a plague.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 06:32 pm
I see that Cyclotroll's panic has shifted into overdrive... this is a great sign for America :-)
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Reply Tue 13 Sep, 2011 06:57 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

We should have done this during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, yes. But instead, we did nothing to control profiteering Cycloptichorn


I think you would have a very hard time demonstrating that the loss of our manufacturing industry and its replacement by lower paying unskilled jobs in the service industry (the cause of flat wage growth & unemployment) was a consequence of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"profiteering" is one very evil thing according to some oeople, including Hitler and the Nazis. Read about it, cyclops, it is history as recorded.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The States Need Help - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fiscal Cliff - Question by JPB
Let GM go Bankrupt - Discussion by Woiyo9
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 07/22/2025 at 08:51:53