@JPB,
JPB wrote:
I disagree, but that's ok. Why would someone choose to expand in today's climate? We aren't talking about hiring for existing demand. There is none. We're talking about expansionary hiring into new areas of R&D.
New R&D doesn't exist unless there's enough demand to drive expansion of the core business, or at the very least to maintain sales where they are. All you're going to do with new R&D is end up laying out a bunch of cash to start something up, in an economy which people and businesses have much less disposable income than they did 5 years ago.
It's a demand issue, plain and simple. Tortured explanations about 'animal emotions' driving business are usually without merit and are unprovable. We can look at a wide variety of business and economic climates throughout American history, and many were just as contentious as today - if not more so - with more regulatory changes looming on the horizon. During ALL these time periods, businesses expanded as long as demand was there.
We ought to be stimulating demand right now through fiscal policy, but the Fed is sitting on it's hands, and the Republicans in gov't don't give a **** about anything getting better until they have someone in the WH.
Cycloptichorn