114
   

Where is the US economy headed?

 
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 11:56 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
Miller: Sharp decrease in spending by the poor? So what! The rich have the dough to compensate for any shortage in spending.

The "rich" has never compensated for the middle class and the poor in keeping our economy running. Where in the world do you get your information? FOX News?


I think it's mostly the middle class who's spending is making the rich people rich too? Our economy is something like 65% based on consumer spending, the vast majority of which is from the middle class.

Would Bill gates be rich if the middle class couldn't afford to buy his company's computers?

How about the Waltons if people couldn't afford to shop at Walmart?

How about Steve Jobs if I couldn't have afforded the new ipod?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 11:57 am
And who is it, Miller, that you think holds the notes on these houses which are going to be foreclosed on?

CBS Marketwatch

Quote:
A Bear Stearns Cos. hedge fund that made leveraged bets in the subprime mortgage market is worth nearly nothing, according to two people briefed by the investment bank.

Investors have been waiting for Bear to update them on the High-Grade Structured Credit Enhanced Leveraged Fund and a larger, less leveraged fund called the High-Grade Structured Credit Fund.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that the larger High-Grade Structured Credit Fund is worth roughly 9% of its value at the end of April.


10 billion dollar hedge fund, worthless. And there will be several more just like it.

The dropping housing market will affect all aspects of our economy, not just the poor. For you to take the short-sighted view that the rich can get by just fine without those who prop up the entire system smacks of unAmericanism at the worst, and simple ignorance at best.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:02 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:

You didn't answer which amenities poor people in America enjoy that the well-to-do in Europe do not. I specifically call on you to do so, or retract your statement.

Cycloptichorn

First of all, I corrected my statement to be more exact, and that is that poor Americans have some better amenities than average citizens of significant parts of Europe.

Now, one amenity is size of residence. Maybe you don't care, you might like a smaller apartment. If so, that is your choice, but the fact remains that more floorspace usually typifies the preference of people so that families are not in cramped living conditions. Did you read my link I posted? If not, here it is again.

http://waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp?formmode=view&id=5454

Have you visited Europe, cyclops? If you have, some simple observations of comparison should be obvious, and one important one is living space. Another would be cars.

Now, does a proliferation of color tvs, cable, cell phones, air conditioners, microwaves, and other gadgets, along with larger homes, plus garages, more cars and trucks, and an obesity problem among the poor strike you as a population that is starving to death for lack of money?

To explain further, I did not say "all amenities," but in a society where we have choices, people have the freedom to make choices between amenities and security, as you love to talk about.

P. S. The article I posted asserts that hunger among the poor in the U.S. has been cut by a third since the mid 90's. Has to be the heartless George Bush that did it.

Another P.S. I have been known to buy "junk" made in China, and some of it is pretty good. Nobody made me buy it.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:24 pm
Quote:

Have you visited Europe, cyclops? If you have, some simple observations of comparison should be obvious, and one important one is living space. Another would be cars.

Now, does a proliferation of color tvs, cable, cell phones, air conditioners, microwaves, and other gadgets, along with larger homes, plus garages, more cars and trucks, and an obesity problem among the poor strike you as a population that is starving to death for lack of money?


Proliferation of stuff does not equal security. You have continually dodged this point, while simultaneously Appealing to Extremes; poor does not equal starving to death.

The Europeans have long had less living space then us, in part due to the fact that their countries rely in large part on the multi-generational family model living in the same house. As did ours, before Social Security, which you all love to hate.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:24 pm
okie wrote:
Now, one amenity is size of residence. Maybe you don't care, you might like a smaller apartment. If so, that is your choice, but the fact remains that more floorspace usually typifies the preference of people so that families are not in cramped living conditions. Did you read my link I posted? If not, here it is again.
Have you visited Europe, cyclops? If you have, some simple observations of comparison should be obvious, and one important one is living space. Another would be cars.



You are really a .... well, you are a social scientist, right, okie?

Comparing cars and the the seize of residences .. Sorry, but that really shows a bit of lack of .... well, whatever.

Carry on with your good work.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:25 pm
I don't know about other people, but I am tired of crybabies in this country. If they had everything, literally everything, it would not be enough. Whiners and complainers knock it off. You live in one great place. Appreciate it for once. And kindly quit trying to convert it into another European country or some socialist country or communist country like Cuba where they all have shared misery. If you are in misery here, its your problem, not the country's.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:26 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:

Have you visited Europe, cyclops? If you have, some simple observations of comparison should be obvious, and one important one is living space. Another would be cars.

Now, does a proliferation of color tvs, cable, cell phones, air conditioners, microwaves, and other gadgets, along with larger homes, plus garages, more cars and trucks, and an obesity problem among the poor strike you as a population that is starving to death for lack of money?


Proliferation of stuff does not equal security. You have continually dodged this point, while simultaneously Appealing to Extremes; poor does not equal starving to death.

The Europeans have long had less living space then us, in part due to the fact that their countries rely in large part on the multi-generational family model living in the same house. As did ours, before Social Security, which you all love to hate.

Cycloptichorn


Go live in Europe, cyclops, if you like it better there.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:27 pm
okie wrote:
I don't know about other people, but I am tired of crybabies in this country. If they had everything, literally everything, it would not be enough. Whiners and complainers knock it off. You live in one great place. Appreciate it for once. And kindly quit trying to convert it into another European country or some socialist country or communist country like Cuba where they all have shared misery. If you are in misery here, its your problem, not the country's.


You (the Right) whine about just as much stuff, just different topics.

Please feel free to step down from your high horse anytime.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:29 pm
okie wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:

Have you visited Europe, cyclops? If you have, some simple observations of comparison should be obvious, and one important one is living space. Another would be cars.

Now, does a proliferation of color tvs, cable, cell phones, air conditioners, microwaves, and other gadgets, along with larger homes, plus garages, more cars and trucks, and an obesity problem among the poor strike you as a population that is starving to death for lack of money?


Proliferation of stuff does not equal security. You have continually dodged this point, while simultaneously Appealing to Extremes; poor does not equal starving to death.

The Europeans have long had less living space then us, in part due to the fact that their countries rely in large part on the multi-generational family model living in the same house. As did ours, before Social Security, which you all love to hate.

Cycloptichorn


Go live in Europe, cyclops, if you like it better there.


Your last comment essentially amounts to a retreat from the argument. I appreciate your efforts, and you did well despite the fact that you were over matched today. I salute you, sir.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:32 pm
Good show Okie.....unfortunately the outcome was not in your favor.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:51 pm
Not in your view. I happen to think we all live pretty good here, maybe you don't. With all due respects to Europe, and I have relatives there and I have visited there, I honestly and respectfully believe with all of my heart that we have a better standard of living here. I don't wish to denigrate Europe, because if not for Europeans, much of what has been accomplished here would not have happened.

From my visits there, I think Europeans center of the world is Europe. Thats fine, but we have every reason to be quite proud of this country and our accomplishments. I am tired of feeling like we all have to apologize for the poor when millions of poor are trying to get here, many illegally, and they are bettering themselves and living better here.

My central point is to think positive, quit being negative, we have boundless opportunity here. For the poor, there are ways to make better choices, and with better choices, their economic lot can be vastly improved, even with relatively low paying jobs.

So no, maporsche and cyclops, I will never buy your mindset, and I will never vote for a Democrat that makes his or her living by telling everybody that there are either two Americas, or how bad everybody is off, or how this country has failed them. It hasn't failed them. We need a message of hope, grounded in the individual and personal responsibility, not the government.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 12:56 pm
okie wrote:
So no, maporsche and cyclops, I will never buy your mindset, and I will never vote for a Democrat that makes his or her living by telling everybody that there are either two Americas, or how bad everybody is off, or how this country has failed them. It hasn't failed them. We need a message of hope, grounded in the individual and personal responsibility, not the government.


You misrepresent my mindset Okie.

And your's appears to be a mindset of ideology as opposed to reality.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 01:01 pm
okie wrote:
Not in your view. I happen to think we all live pretty good here, maybe you don't. With all due respects to Europe, and I have relatives there and I have visited there, I honestly and respectfully believe with all of my heart that we have a better standard of living here. I don't wish to denigrate Europe, because if not for Europeans, much of what has been accomplished here would not have happened.

From my visits there, I think Europeans center of the world is Europe. Thats fine, but we have every reason to be quite proud of this country and our accomplishments. I am tired of feeling like we all have to apologize for the poor when millions of poor are trying to get here, many illegally, and they are bettering themselves and living better here.

My central point is to think positive, quit being negative, we have boundless opportunity here. For the poor, there are ways to make better choices, and with better choices, their economic lot can be vastly improved, even with relatively low paying jobs.

So no, maporsche and cyclops, I will never buy your mindset, and I will never vote for a Democrat that makes his or her living by telling everybody that there are either two Americas, or how bad everybody is off, or how this country has failed them. It hasn't failed them. We need a message of hope, grounded in the individual and personal responsibility, not the government.


I really don't care that you think we're better off here then in Europe, because it isn't material to the discussion we're having.

You specifically alleged that the poorest members of America enjoy amenities that the well to do, not just the average, but the well to do, in Europe, do not. When called on this, you were unable to explain your position and instead retreat to a screed about how much better we are then Europe.

You've completely dropped the point that the rising stock market doesn't affect the vast majority of Americans much at all, including the so-called 'investment class' who have 401ks. The contention made by MaPorsche and myself that the vast amount of wealth generated by the stock market goes to the rich was similarly dropped by you.

In a debate, when you drop all of your opponents points without adequately responding to them, it's known as 'losing.' My original contentions stand: That our economy is not in the greatest shape. That the average American has seen rises in the prices of many goods, without a significant rise in wages. That the stock market is not indicative of the economic situation for Americans as a whole, but only the most upper class of Americans. That wealth is measured in security, not in stuff.

Unless you have specific evidence or logic to counter those points, you cannot be said to have been successful in the discussion. It isn't a matter of opinion, really.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 01:11 pm
okie wrote:
Not in your view. I happen to think we all live pretty good here, maybe you don't. With all due respects to Europe, and I have relatives there and I have visited there, I honestly and respectfully believe with all of my heart that we have a better standard of living here. I don't wish to denigrate Europe, because if not for Europeans, much of what has been accomplished here would not have happened.

From my visits there, I think Europeans center of the world is Europe.


Well, there are ... at east 47 countries in Europe.
I sincerely doubt that you have more than an idea perhaps a coule of those.

I do admit that most private places I've sen in the USA aren't bad at all.
But comparing those owners and families with comparable in .... well, those six, seven European countries I know quite well, it's neither better nor worse: both sides of the ocean have advantages and bad sides.
It's more a kind of from where you look at it, I think.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 01:13 pm
Cyclops, please carry on an honest debate. I did alter my statement slightly, but I am not retracting my point, not at all. And to claim the stock market only affects the rich is downright ignorant. Even if you are not invested personally in the market, and alot more people are than you begin to admit, but even if they are not, the ripple effects throughout the economy are considerable.

Remembering back into the 90's, many people built second homes, by reaping the growth of stock values rising. All of this affected construction companies. Only one example of endless examples. Please go study Basic Economics, cyclops. There are no effects in this economy that do not have ripple effects. Trickle down does happen. It is the rich, or the people that have something of worth, like businesses, stock, and property that provide jobs, plain and simple.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 01:17 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Well, there are ... at east 47 countries in Europe.
I sincerely doubt that you have more than an idea perhaps a coule of those.

I do admit that most private places I've sen in the USA aren't bad at all.
But comparing those owners and families with comparable in .... well, those six, seven European countries I know quite well, it's neither better nor worse: both sides of the ocean have advantages and bad sides.
It's more a kind of from where you look at it, I think.

Probably true. I base some of mine on seeing London and surrounding areas.
Also, I do not believe happiness is a bigger house. But at the same time, I don't see why Americans need to complain either, and that is my point.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 01:18 pm
okie wrote:
Cyclops, please carry on an honest debate. I did alter my statement slightly, but I am not retracting my point, not at all. And to claim the stock market only affects the rich is downright ignorant. Even if you are not invested personally in the market, and alot more people are than you begin to admit, but even if they are not, the ripple effects throughout the economy are considerable.

Remembering back into the 90's, many people built second homes, by reaping the growth of stock values rising. All of this affected construction companies. Only one example of endless examples. Please go study Basic Economics, cyclops. There are no effects in this economy that do not have ripple effects. Trickle down does happen. It is the rich, or the people that have something of worth, like businesses, stock, and property that provide jobs, plain and simple.


Please don't retreat to trite talking points.

I have never argued that the stock market affected 'only the rich.' My argument has consistently been that the Rich are the ones who are profiting from the stock market to a vast degree. Most 'regular' investors, who have a little stock in a 401k, have not seen gigantic gains, and certainly not ones which have been transformative in their lives - as you say the 90's were. We aren't experiencing anything close to this.

I agree that there are 'ripple effects.' You may want to go back and look at my points to Miller about how poor folks losing their houses will in fact have a large effect on the overall economy.

There is no evidence that 'trickle-down' economics actually works, sorry. There certainly are no statistics that you can provide that back this up. We've been over this before, and you lost that argument, too.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 01:24 pm
The sun comes up in the morning, but I guess I can't prove it to ya.

If it doesn't trickle down, where does it trickle from anyway?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 01:25 pm
okie wrote:
The sun comes up in the morning, but I guess I can't prove it to ya.


Once again, you have resorted to trite comments in lieu of providing actual evidence to back up your positions. This, and I don't mean any offense, is not a sign of either a good argument nor a good presentation of said argument.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 01:26 pm
Trite argument? If you don't have any money, how can you hire anyone, cyclops? You have to use some logic to begin with.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The States Need Help - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fiscal Cliff - Question by JPB
Let GM go Bankrupt - Discussion by Woiyo9
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 03/11/2025 at 11:42:25