114
   

Where is the US economy headed?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 12:44 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
From MetroActive.
Quote:

Swung for a Lupo

VW's most fuel-efficient car isn't available in the U.S.

By Joy Lanzendorfer

Since you've probably never seen a Volkswagen Lupo, let me describe it to you. For one thing, it's cute. It's not quite as cute as a VW Beetle, but still pretty darn adorable for a car. It weighs less than a ton, great for weaving in and out of traffic. Though it's not the fastest car on the road, it can go from zero to 62 mph in 8.3 seconds, according to the British VW website. It's a marvel of engineering with a three-cylinder, 1.2-liter diesel engine. And if you wanted to, you could grow your own fuel to run it.

Best of all, the Lupo has gotten up to 99 miles per gallon in test drives, though in normal driving situations, it may be closer to 78 miles per gallon. It has been called the most fuel-efficient car in the world.

But VW has no plans to sell the Lupo in the United States. The company believes there is no market for fuel-efficient cars in our SUV-populated country.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 12:49 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Indeed, c.i.

We had had this discussion already some years ago on a different thread.

The smallest car I could get in September last year was a Chevy Aveo ... and people at Hertz' looked at me as if I was mad when I told them, I wanted to drive some hundreds of miles with it.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 12:54 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
From MetroActive.
Quote:

Swung for a Lupo
VW's most fuel-efficient car isn't available in the U.S.

By Joy Lanzendorfer

Since you've probably never seen a Volkswagen Lupo, let me describe it to you. For one thing, it's cute. It's not quite as cute as a VW Beetle, but still pretty darn adorable for a car. It weighs less than a ton, great for weaving in and out of traffic. Though it's not the fastest car on the road, it can go from zero to 62 mph in 8.3 seconds, according to the British VW website. It's a marvel of engineering with a three-cylinder, 1.2-liter diesel engine. And if you wanted to, you could grow your own fuel to run it.

Best of all, the Lupo has gotten up to 99 miles per gallon in test drives, though in normal driving situations, it may be closer to 78 miles per gallon. It has been called the most fuel-efficient car in the world.

But VW has no plans to sell the Lupo in the United States. The company believes there is no market for fuel-efficient cars in our SUV-populated country.

Interesting post, but who is Joy Lanzendorfer and how does she know that VW does not think there is no market for fuel efficient cars in the US.? As I've already posted, our local For dealer is selling Vespas, and I have seen quite a number of them being driven. There is also an electric car in the neiborhood and at least 2 Smart Cars in town. Is it mor a case that VW is not trying to sell them for some reason?
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 12:57 pm
@okie,
Are you really going to sit here and tell us that Conservatives haven't been ridiculing European cars for years for being too small? And that Conservatives haven't fought requirements that cars be made more efficient?

Cycloptichorn
parados
 
  0  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 01:00 pm
@okie,
You are too funny okie..
You claimed this was at the time you lived in Denver. Now you are using cars from the last 5 years.

I guess your version of common sense means you are going to just change the facts when you need to.
Cycloptichorn
 
  0  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 01:01 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:

You are too funny okie..
You claimed this was at the time you lived in Denver. Now you are using cars from the last 5 years.

I guess your version of common sense means you are going to just change the facts when you need to.


It would appear so. This whole conversation has just gotten ridiculous and taken an odd turn.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  2  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 01:01 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
I am all for innovation and efficiency, if I am not forced to buy it. I think it would be an interesting point to find out why the Lupo or Fox is not sold here. Somehow I doubt it is VW's choice not to sell them here because they think there is no market.
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 01:03 pm
@okie,
Well, okie, then tell us why only now you can get "small" cars in the USA.

(Until 2008, smarts were only available as "grey market" imports in the USA - now they sell some ... "despite lack of leasing sales" [original quote from the importer, Penske Automotive Group, who relinquished distribution of the smart to Mercedes-Benz USA this year.)
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 01:05 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

I am all for innovation and efficiency, if I am not forced to buy it. I think it would be an interesting point to find out why the Lupo or Fox is not sold here. Somehow I doubt it is VW's choice not to sell them here because they think there is no market.


Why do you doubt that? VW makes a lot of money off of cars they sell here in America, and nothing is preventing them from bringing that car here. Why go to crazy lengths to make up some 'hidden' reason why they don't want to make money, when they will flat-out admit to you that they don't think they can make enough money off of the product to sell it here?

Occam's razor, Okie...

BTW, I think that when you say, "I'm all for efficiency - so long as I don't have to be the one who is being efficient," what that really means is that you are NOT 'all for efficiency.'

Cycloptichorn
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 01:06 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
I agree, Cyclo. Especially, since they easily could import that car from Mexico .... or even produce it in the USA.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 01:10 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
From this year's Detroit auto show:
Quote:
"I'm a little concerned that nobody's talking about the consumer, what the buyer wants," says Rebecca Lindland, ranking industry expert at IHS Global Automotive, a consultant. She says her research tells her: "We like our big cars, and we are going to keep buying them as long as gas is relatively cheap. ...We're not going to look like Europe anytime soon."

Even small-car specialist Fiat Auto doesn't have high expectations for the U.S. as a small-car market.

"I don't see a big market (in small cars). I see a market. There is a big difference," says Sergio Marchionne, CEO of Fiat Auto and Chrysler Group. "We never set out to conquer the U.S. market with A and B cars."
Source
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  0  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 03:36 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Quote:
BTW, I think that when you say, "I'm all for efficiency - so long as I don't have to be the one who is being efficient," what that really means is that you are NOT 'all for efficiency.'


Okie's all fur it, cept when he's agin' it.
cicerone imposter
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 03:50 pm
@parados,
Somebody needs to archive okie's posts for future use. LOL
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 05:15 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
One could make an argument that advertising, if not twisting the consumer's arm, "forces" the consumer to buy things through lies, straw man arguments, exaggeration and brainwashing.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 05:27 pm
@plainoldme,
But think of the jobs pom. Not just in advertising. In all the industries and services which the population have been forced to buy with lies, straw man arguments, exaggeration and brainwashing. And with money from activities which would not exist without the things lies, straw man arguments, exaggeration and brainwashing forced people to buy.

Ladies beauty treatments for example. Or how to make mutton look like lamb.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 06:03 pm
@spendius,
Hey, spendi, is that how England's economy survives? How does other country's economy compare to your unemployment rate of 8%?
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 07:17 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Are you for promoting what Spendius is speaking out against?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  2  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2011 05:03 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
okie wrote:
I am all for innovation and efficiency, if I am not forced to buy it. I think it would be an interesting point to find out why the Lupo or Fox is not sold here. Somehow I doubt it is VW's choice not to sell them here because they think there is no market.
Why do you doubt that? VW makes a lot of money off of cars they sell here in America, and nothing is preventing them from bringing that car here. Why go to crazy lengths to make up some 'hidden' reason why they don't want to make money, when they will flat-out admit to you that they don't think they can make enough money off of the product to sell it here?
First of all, I have friends that own VWs, so I am fully aware that VW sells bunches of cars here. However, the mpg reported for a Lupo or Fox is far more than anybody I know gets out of a Passat or Jetta for example, so I think I am fully justified in wondering why they do not sell those more efficient ones here. Furthermore, I am not making up some hidden reason why they do not sell them here, and I do not think it is because they do not want to make money. So, I think my curiosity is totally justified. An attempt to research the answer why Lupo and Fox were not or are not sold here has not been very successful, but my reading has confirmed the fact that meeting crash test regulations by the NHTSB (National Highway Transportation Safety Board) is in fact a major hurdle for importers of cars into this country. My searching did turn up this post on a website from 2004 about the Lupo "VW has stated it has no intention of exporting the Lupo to North America. A Canadian dealer told me it was because it cannot meet the
crash test standards."
So , cyclops, you probably suspicioned where I was heading with this, but I think my suspicions might be right, that it was the regulations here in this country that perhaps prevented it. Someone with more time or knowledge about this could perhaps find the definitive answer. Ever since 2006 when I visited Denmark and discovered the Lupo and what economy it delivered, I have always wondered. As Iv'e said, our local Ford dealer is selling Vespas, so I am pretty confident that if there is a non-hybrid car that can deliver over 70 mpg, I am sure VW could establish a dealer network to sell at least hundreds of thousands of cars. I also understand that VW as a corporation has many factors to consider, including how this would affect their other models being produced and sold. I also understand other constraints and buyer habits in the U.S., but I still stick to the fact that free market principles reign here. I was not blind to the many scooters popping up all over town when gasoline hit $4 per gallon last year, and we know it will do that again and more.



My brother in law bought a Prius when they first came out, and he still likes the car, but to be honest, it is a roller skate that should get at least 40 mpg even without a battery, and he knows it might not turn out that well economically after the battery needs replacing. The best he ever got was about 70 mpg with a tail wind going to New Mexico, but it does still do 45 to 50 around town and so forth.


Quote:
BTW, I think that when you say, "I'm all for efficiency - so long as I don't have to be the one who is being efficient," what that really means is that you are NOT 'all for efficiency.'
Cycloptichorn
Wrong, cyclops. I am for what works out for me the best. I own a Ford F-150 because I need it for work and other things. I also have an old Taurus that surpasses 30 on the road and more than 20 in town, which is not bad. I have always considered at some point buying a hybrid or an electric car, but not until it makes econmic sense. I've looked at insurance costs and tire costs, and all of that, and right now it makes no sense to buy a 3rd car for strictly around town. To reiterate, it is not the government's business to make my decisions. It is up to me to weigh the options. I have never owned, nor will I ever own a Chevy Suburban, I will tell you that, because they are not the type of vehicle that is efficient, so I do not understand why so many people have owned SUV's. Probably the primary reason is the car and child seat regulations in this country, and so all the families and soccer moms had to have vehicles to accomodate it. Again, the culprit might be over-regulation, cyclops. You need to face the truth that regulations in this country do in fact affect the car market in a major fashion.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2011 06:36 pm
@okie,
To expand on my post, I believe the SUV market in the U.S. was greatly influenced by regulation as much as it was the American people wanting big cars. Specifically, a big reason for the success of SUV's was the seat belt and child restrain laws in this country.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2011 06:40 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Another bone of contention is that VW sells cars in the US (by the millions). What is holding up sales of the Lupo is a mystery if they can get 70 mpg.
I think they did not meet NHTSB crash test regulations, ci. See one of my above posts. I could not find proof of that on the web search, but at least one post on a website indicated that a Canadian dealer told him that. If you can find the answer, please try, as I am curious.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The States Need Help - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fiscal Cliff - Question by JPB
Let GM go Bankrupt - Discussion by Woiyo9
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/17/2025 at 08:20:19