114
   

Where is the US economy headed?

 
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:14 am
@okie,
That would be an example of you attempting to hold POM to a standard of evidence you don't hold yourself to okie.

It must be part of your personal responsibility schtick. Others have to be more responsible than you are. I can "connect the dots" when it comes to your statements okie. Shouldn't that be enough evidence? It is for you.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:18 am
@parados,
More of your garbage, parados. If you want to pursue this and find out the reality of it, the lesbian accusation is a good one. Pom and you have accused me of many things, but the lesbian one is a good example, let us pursue it. Pom accused me of calling her a lesbian. I asked for proof, to which she has not produced. I believe she should apologize for making an accusation that was not true. The same goes for you. What are you going to do with it, have decency or continue to post your unfounded crap? The same goes for you, ci.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:18 am
@okie,
Quote:
I've had enough of your garbage, ci. You have called me a liar so many times now, without one shred of evidence provided, I am fed up with you.

There's another example of your setting a different standard for yourself again okie..

Please provide 10 instances of Ci calling you a liar or apologize to him. You MUST provide quotes. (I am assuming you can count to 10 which means "so many times" would be more than 10.)
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:18 am
@okie,
No, I will not knock it off. It's been proven by many that you have lied, and you also have the chutzpah for us to prove it. We have. So often, it's tiresome.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:19 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

More of your garbage, parados. If you want to pursue this and find out the reality of it, the lesbian accusation is a good one. Pom and you have accused me of many things, but the lesbian one is a good example, let us pursue it. Pom accused me of calling her a lesbian. I asked for proof, to which she has not produced. I believe she should apologize for making an accusation that was not true. The same goes for you. What are you going to do with it, have decency or continue to post your unfounded crap? The same goes for you, ci.

Please quote where I said POM called you a lesbian or apologize to me okie.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:23 am
@parados,
parados wrote:
Please provide 10 instances of Ci calling you a liar or apologize to him. You MUST provide quotes. (I am assuming you can count to 10 which means "so many times" would be more than 10.)
Thats an easy one. The last time was just a few posts back on this thread. Here it is:
http://able2know.org/topic/47327-752#post-4551924
Quote:
...What you find "unfounded" has been proven wrong so often, it's a wonder you still don't "get it." You are a liar, don't remember what you write from one post to the next, and rewrite history so often, it's a wonder you can live with anybody else.....


P.S. "So many times" being 10 is you talking again. I don't know how many times ci has called me a liar, but I know its been many times. I provided the latest example, which is enough for now.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:29 am
@parados,
parados wrote:
Please quote where I said POM called you a lesbian or apologize to me okie.
Are you nuts, parados? I never said that you said that POM called me a lesbian. It was POM that accused me of calling her a lesbian. Now you can't even understand what I said, or you are pretending not to, one or the other.

This is so ridiculous as to leave me sick of it all. Do you libs have any decency at all?
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:32 am
@okie,
Your statement isn't clear okie. Since you don't think I ever said that then how can it be an example of me doing anything?

Perhaps you can provide an example of me doing something you said I do. Or you could apologize since that is your personal standard.
okie
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:39 am
@parados,
I am not going to repeat what I have written. What I wrote has been clear.

For anyone else that happens here, parados even started a thread "Okie Knows Farming," I think with the goal to niggle me until he could discredit me, but all he did was make claims to the point that he cast even more doubt onto the already dubious poster that he is. A couple of his claims were that he milked cows twice a day from the age of 7 until about 16, and that he and his brother were baling and stacking hay all by themselves at ages 9 and 10. Does anyone have any swamp land they need to sell? If so, contact anyone that believes parados in all that he claims and says here.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:41 am
@okie,
okie, The fact of the matter is, I can prove you are a liar - with your own words. However, let me make it very clear, that it's been proven by many on these boards, and I'm not about to go hunting for them just because you ask.

Your memory is faulty, but mine isn't. If you believe mine is faulty, I want you to prove it? I'll wait - until hell freezes over.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:43 am
@okie,
Quote:
I think with the goal to niggle me until he could discredit me

I hate to niggle okie but it appears you don't understand the meaning of the word "niggle."

I do notice that rather than provide any evidence to back up your claim or apologize for that lack of evidence, you have instead tried to change the subject with what appears to be an attack on my person rather than my statements.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 12:19 pm
http://www.deptofnumbers.com/unemployment/us/
US Unemployment History
Date............ National Unemployed Persons
February 2011............ 13,673,000
January 2011............ 13,863,000
December 2010............ 14,485,000
November 2010............ 15,041,000
October 2010............ 14,876,000
September 2010............ 14,746,000
August 2010............ 14,849,000
July 2010............ 14,637,000
June 2010............ 14,593,000
May 2010............ 14,884,000
April 2010............ 15,138,000
March 2010............ 14,943,000
February 2010............ 14,860,000

Total US Civil Employment during the period 1980 - 2007 increased from 99.3 to 146 million, and during the period 2007 - 2010 decreased from 146 to 139 million.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 12:29 pm
@ican711nm,
ican, You are so ignorant, I wonder why you continue to reinforce that fact. Employment will increase as our population increases. DUH!

Population, 1960-2000
............. 1960...................1970............. .....1980..............1990.......... 2000
Total 179,323,175 ..203,302,031 ... 226,545,805...248,709,873 281,421,906
Change................ 23,978,856....... 23,243,774.... 22,164,068.... 32,712,033
Percent Change .........13.37%............ 11.43%.......... 9.78%..... 13.15%


We've added 78 million more in population between 1980 and 2000.
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 12:36 pm
Okie, I recommend that you ignore the parts of the posts of parados, Cycloptichorn, cicerone imposter, et al, that libel you. I treat those libels by them of me as evidence that when they occur, those folks lack a valid argument.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 12:38 pm
@ican711nm,
ican, It's not libel if they are true. Please sue me! I'm begging.

My only witness will be able2know.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 12:45 pm
@cicerone imposter,
While the US population has increased since 2007 when Democrat majoritties were elected in both the US House and Senate, the number of people employed in the US has decreased from 146 million to 139 million.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 01:46 pm
@ican711nm,
Your ignorance shows up again and again; I guess you never heard of the Great Recession.

FYI, it's the worst economic disaster to hit the world since the Great Depression.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 03:54 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
okie, The fact of the matter is, I can prove you are a liar - with your own words. However, let me make it very clear, that it's been proven by many on these boards, and I'm not about to go hunting for them just because you ask.

Your memory is faulty, but mine isn't. If you believe mine is faulty, I want you to prove it? I'll wait - until hell freezes over.
I will be waiting for you to make good on your claim as you posted above. Here is what you said, ci : "I can prove you are a liar - with your own words."

Go ahead and post what you consider proof using my words, and we will all see if you can do what you promise, or if it is merely an opinion of yours, a slanted interpretation, or whatever it is?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 04:01 pm
@okie,
okie, That's already been proven often. As I've already said, I'm not going back to look for your lies, because it's not necessary. Any suit you bring forward will result in researching all or most of your lies. What you must do is show that my memory is faulty. You can't.
okie
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 04:06 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Then your claim that you could prove me a liar with my own words was nothing but crap, ci. You are all bluster and no substance. You make accusations with no evidence. Why don't you simply knock off your nonsense?
 

Related Topics

The States Need Help - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fiscal Cliff - Question by JPB
Let GM go Bankrupt - Discussion by Woiyo9
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 10/30/2025 at 03:24:07