Where is the US economy headed?

This forum is for the purpose of providing evidence to back up your claims, Bill.

I thought Beck did some good work to document all the Marxist sympathizers that Obama has appointed or tried to appoint to his administration. Beck did some good work there, and they are facts as evidence shows. Are you prepared to defy evidence, cyclops? Probably not, so why should I even ask?

Ta-Da - See, you just proved it!

You can't handle the truth - you have been assimulated fool!

I suppose if you are a lib, perhaps you would think more like a Nadler, as he said about the constitution:
"Nadler called the "ritualistic reading" on the floor "total nonsense" and "propaganda" "
Do you also think the constitution of the United States is propaganda and total nonsense, Bill? I hope you know what group of people you have identified yourself with.

Ta-Da - See, you just proved it!

You can't handle the truth - you have been assimulated fool!

You don't even know what an argument is, don't try debating fool!

Do you even know you created a strawman there? Do you even know what a strawman is? Get some education fool!

Provide evidence that Beck was not correct with his research, Bill. You cannot go around here accusing people of lying, without evidence. Also, did Nadler not say what he said?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/04/AR2011010405252.html

Do you even know you created a strawman there? Do you even know what a strawman is? Get some education fool!

You have to have real arguments first dummy!

Predictable of you, Bill. When libs can't provide any good arguments anymore, they resort to accusing of "strawman" and calling the opponents fools and dummys. You seem to fit the mold. By the way, what is your education, oh wise one?

Listen, I don't have time to teach you what is real and what is your hokey pokey Beck **** dude. Go to school, learn and leave that clap trap fake conservative **** alone - okay. Learn what a debate is, what an argument is, what logic and reality is - then come back!

Can you talk without gutter language, Bill? Can you carry on a decent and logical conversation as an adult? Are you so slanted as to dismiss credible and factual reasoning?

You claim to be so much smarter, so what is your education?

Okay, I'll give you one lesson:

Fact:

A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by substituting it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position.

Fact: "Nadler called the "ritualistic reading" on the floor "total nonsense" and "propaganda"

Strawman:

your statement!

Truth:

The Constitution isn't propaganda - the act of reading it in Congress is.

Truth:

You assume (makes u an ass not me) that I agree with Nadler. I don't because reading the Constitution in Congress shows how stupid the Conservative party is and how out of touch with the Constitution the Conservative party is.


See how simple it is - do it

In my opinion, you are another radical leftist nutcase, Bill. I have no clue who you are, what your education is, or what you do or have done for a living, but your statements do not gender any respect for you at all.

I personally wish every Congress would have read the document every month, and maybe they could have learned something. Just maybe, and that would have been worth a shot. After all, they do have to swear to uphold it, don't they, and if they don't know what it says, how can they uphold it? Maybe that is why they have failed so miserably in the past?

All I know is you are a stupid illogical conservative - spouting drivel that is worthless to discuss anything with.

Dems know the Constitution, Conserves could even understand their belly buttons!

Besides calling me names, I have yet to see you write anything logical, or present any evidence to support your beliefs. Do you in fact think reading the constitution in Congress is illogical too? I do not. Maybe we could start by debating your opinion further about that?

Already answered above........

The problem is you don't know what logical or evidence is; it's missing from 100% of your postings on a2k. You haven't a clue.

Your beliefs belong on the laffer curve, because it lacks any evidence, facts, real history, or scholarly thesis by a credible source. Glenn Beck is scrapping from the bottom of the empty barrel.

Debating with you is like trying to steal candy from a five year old; there's no satisfaction in it, because it's not a challenge. It only makes you look more stupid.

Okay, back to Beck. How about disproving Becks reporting of Obama appointing Marxist sympathizers or Marxists? Can you do that? I think you are up against a pretty big mountain of evidence, Bill, so I don't know how you think you can rebut him on that issue for example. Facts are stubborn things, as Romney said a few times in the last presidential election's debates.

Also the Laffer Curve is a logical fact of economics and math, not complicated. Do you wish to disagree with that too?

That's no proof of anything: what Marxist legislation was brought forward by Obama during his first two years?

I can see trying to reason with libs here on a forum like this is hopeless when they think reading the constitution by Congress is propaganda. Good night, guys.

there is no hope for you