@H2O MAN,
Don't some of these posts make you laugh?
First the Republicans were stupid and didn't know what they were doing and now the Democrats are stupid and don't know what they are doing after having been elected by the parties of the first part. And these are the best people the voters can agree upon. Imagine the shambles if some of these silly sods were put in charge.
Seems like a Tea Party pitch to me.
Perhaps the US is ungovernable which some experts think was the precise intention of the Constitution at a time when " a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do" and the population was one tenth the present total, had no roads, no internal combustion engine, no electricity and callouses on its hands. Babies being born in covered wagons. Not that the babies would bother.
The senator from Oregon had about a fortnight in Washington to pitch for his baying electorate. The other 50 weeks went in travelling on horseback through very threatening territory. By which time the concessions he had wrung from their stony hearts in Washington and carried back in triumph had been cancelled.
The Constitution should have banned ******* eh? As Jesus had advised. Or licensed it like the Chinese communists do. Perhaps they didn't like admitting they had a zoo on their hands like the evolutionists reckon and as Malthus (Darwin's ideas man) would have told them had they waited a few more years.
This is good eh? The more food we grow, the more ******* there is and the more ******* there is the more ungovernable we become. It's down in black and white. Darwin believed it.
Solution- scapegoat the best we can find, who are being said here to be no better, and pretend there's no ******* going on.
If we could **** in the open the Greens would rush up shouting "'ere- you can't do that 'ere--don't you know how much oil an American baby is destined to consume?"
