@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
Yep, and then he accuses others of misrepresenting what he says when we cut and paste his own words and present them back to him on a platter.
You have in fact misrepresented what I have said. I have challenged you to many proofs with evidence or quotes to support your accusations, and you don't produce. You instead throw out more insults. You pretend to be some kind of political expert, but if you are, you are one sad excuse for one.
I will point out again one example of what I am talking about, you made an assertion that I said the families or survivors of the 9/11 victims should determine the perimeter of any park or historical site created around Ground Zero. I proved over and over what I did say, which was that I thought local zoning authorities should ask those families or survivors for their input or opinions about that, along with consulting all other appropriate authorites, agencies, and so forth, such as Homeland Security and the National Park Service for example, so that the local authorities could make a better decision about any zoning as it related to any proposed or future perimeter. Total common sense in my opinion, but no, you continued to twist what I said and repeatedly accused me of lying.
To this day, I am still waiting for an apology out of you. If you had one shred of decency, you would apologize, because it is obvious what I did say and did not say, all you had to do was read all of my posts. I still don't know if you can't read with comprehension or you simply insist upon twisting what I said into something that you think you can criticize me for. Whatever your problem, your accusations were wrong, and it is you that was lying or too dumb to read with comprehension. I am still waiting for you to acknowledge your mistake and apologize. And this is but one of numerous examples of the silly name calling here by liberals onto us conservatives, all unjustified and made up from twisted and wrong reasoning.
