@cicerone imposter,
Quote:No, I didn't read the whole article.
Next time, try actually reading the articles I link to.
Quote:Your abbreviation of the article implies you didn't want people reading your post to see your added quote; otherwise, you would have included it.
Not at all.
I have NEVER included the full article on any link I have posted.
I dont believe thats neccessary, and I find that people wont read the article or op-ed if its long.
I have always posted only the first couple of paragraphs and a link to the story.
I see no reason to change that.
Quote:Besides, that added post doesn't say whether that $400,00o was approved by Bush or Obama.
Since the article clearly states that the study began in 2008, and since Obama wasnt president till 2009, it doesnt take any thought to figure out whose admin authorized the money.
Quote:You can infer anything you wish, but you're pissing in the wind.
So now you are contradicting an earlier position you took that says things inferred are just as valid as things actually stated?
Or are you saying that I am blaming Obama for the study?
Since I have clearly stated WHEN the study was started, how is it even remotely possible that I am blaming Obama?