@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
If name-calling and personal insults are fine, they should drop the rule, people can then make a new assessment of the pros/cons of the site.
Declaring a rule against name calling is the easy part.
I'm guessing we agree that Donald Trump is a bigot; and that it would be a little silly to pull posts that point this out.
I'm guessing we also agree that Setanta is not a bigot. But that there is a user or two on a2k who is.
So when is describing someone as a bigot name-calling, and when is it a valid observation?
Would you want to send out a team of volunteer mods (with wide ranging political views) with the responsibility to make individual judgement calls about when it's one or the other?
If not, what are the alternatives, other than either pulling it in all cases (even when it's justified and relevant) or allowing it in all cases (even when it's unjustified or irrelevant)?
All of that's a choice you don't have to make when someone just calls someone else an asshole or an idiot...