Shep Smith: Journalists are not the enemy of the people

so, by your definition, an impeachmnt does not constitute an "evaluation "?
Dictionaries are our friends they teach us that words have precise, but also varied, meanings

Definition of words are shyts for some people, isn't it? LOL

Here is what I replied to.


Where do you see the word impeachment?

Damn Farmer, you are deep.

His comprehension problems rival yours.

That's because the other fella is so shallow.

I was suggesting that "Impeachment: be included as another valid word for "evaluation of a president".Again, your Comprehension "skills" (im being generous), seem a bit limited.
You were the one who claimed you cant even officially evaluate a sitting president when the US Constitution clearly describes a prescriptive process for just such "evaluation" of a sitting president.

AGREE??

No, I do not agree because I said nothing about impeachment. You know damn well what I meant. Try harder.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/17/us/politics/donald-trump-impeachment-news.html 3 hours ago. QUOTE: Impeachment Inquiry: Mulvaney Undercuts Trump’s Denials of Quid Pro Quo also, https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/17/mulvaney-confirms-ukraine-aid-2016-probe-050156

There is no impeachment inquiry. It will not be voted on, there will be no Senate trial. It boils down to presidential harassment, that is all.

coldjoint, You lack any education on many subjects that you have provided your personal opinion without so much as any credible support for them. This is just another one. Here's the process on impeachment inquiry. See if you comprehend what has happened in our history, and absorb what is happening today. An "impeachment inquiry" is not impeachment. It's only the process. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/us/politics/fact-check-impeachment.html /also, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50061727 /also, https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/15/house-democratic-leaders-impeachment-vote-047136

That is what is called projection.

I know you said nothing about it. That, however does not change the truth that an impeachment process or inquiry is Congress's inspection of the presidents action . All summarized in the US Contitution.

A I said before, words have precise meanings in several definitions

I really cant believe youre trying to argue the point, yet you do prove several other points about the keenness of your mental perception, and they aint great news Im afraid to say .

Call it what you wish; it still stands.

You rarely know what you are talking about. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/423107-majority-in-poll-want-trump-impeached-or-censured

What does a poll have to do with an inquiry that does not legally exist?

All these folks who ridicule 'victimhood' as some sort of liberal or democrat boo hoo cry baby weakness ARE outraged over the fact that baby hands fat ass New York puff ball can't take a punch. Presidential harassment..oh the outrage oh the horror oh the hypocrisy. Sour grapes, sore heads, you just don't want to admit you supported a demented fabulist who insists on being the center of attention 24/7 and his only motivation is revenge, obliteration and payback upon anyone who doesn't worship at the flame of lamp of bullshit, his wisdom, bask in his glory with reverence and gratitude. Or in other words, you folks are cult members......try not to drink the kool-aid, it will. not be good for you. Nobody wants you to perish.

You have been punching for 3 years. Guess you do not how to throw a punch.

I need to rethink your last sentence.

I understand.