Whether or not you find me funny is a matter of indifference to me ...I certainly don't get angry over a non-entity like you ... I came to my point of view from reading abstracts of papers... I know you think that you're Mr. Science, but it may dismay you to find out that others don't agree ...
I await your effort to support the claims you have made. For example, you still have not shown that any material in the links I provided contradicts what I have said. As for a sense of humor, I have never seen you to exhibit one.
Setanta. If you don't want to discuss both sides of the Koko story, then why are you responding to my posts? You can either just skip by most posts, or you can push that little ignore button. Instead you are turning this thread into a thread about yourself.
Koko is a cultural phenomenon. Koko is also scientifically questionable
. The posts I made on this thread are relevant to the Koko story.
I am not the only person talking about both sides of the story. Here is your link. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44576449
I am sorry I offended you. Every post I made on this thread is relevant to the Koko story except maybe for the comparison to the Downfall videos, but that was in response to the video someone else posted about Koko's environmental video.
There are two sides to this story. Chomsky and Pinker (leading experts in the field) refute the claims about Koko (and Washoe and Nim et al.). This other side of the story is perfectly relevant.
No, Setanta, I do not owe you anything. This thread is about Koko. It is not about you. This happens all of the time with you, you only want one side of the story to be expressed... and you attack anyone who dares to express the other side.
I don't want to be talking about you, Setanta. This thread is about Koko.